This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Engineering Case Study - An Interdisciplinary Comparison
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The case study approach, as an educational tool, has achieved widespread use in a variety of disciplines. The case method affords several advantages over conventional and traditional lecture methods of education, but the degree of effectiveness of the case study approach varies considerably between different disciplines. Therefore, an interdisciplinary comparison of case study techniques may be of some value in improving the case study methods used in engineering studies.
The most notable applications of case methods include the areas of business and management decision making, medicine, the social sciences, and engineering. The Harvard School of Business has established the pattern for business case studies. Much of today's accepted medical practice is based on “case studies.” Many significant sociological and psychological findings are based on case studies, while engineering case studies can be applied to achieve a wide variety of objectives including creativity in design, technical feasibility, etc. The analysis of the case study historically applied in each discipline reveals certain characteristics which seem to be unique to each area of case study application. Interdisciplinary comparison also reveals basic differences in case study techniques. Some of these differences lie in the nature of the discipline itself, while some are based upon extraneous causes which are completely unrelated to the area of study.
On the basis of the interdisciplinary analysis and comparison, certain conclusions may be drawn regarding the effectiveness of the engineering case study. The evidence seems to indicate that there is far more potential for improvement in the engineering case study than in the other areas considered. The basic recommendation resulting from the comparison of case study methods is that engineering educators incorporate more case studies into their courses. Engineering educators should also integrate into their case studies as many as possible of the characteristics of successfully proven case study techniques used in other disciplines.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Brewerton, F., "The Engineering Case Study - An Interdisciplinary Comparison," SAE Technical Paper 700003, 1970, https://doi.org/10.4271/700003.Also In
References
- “The Case Method of Teaching Human Relations and Administration.” Andrews Kenneth R. Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press 1953
- “Case Studies Teach High School History.” Business Education World February 1 1964 94
- “The Case Method in Teaching Social Work.” New York National Association of Social Workers 1959
- “Fine New Art of Educating Engineers.” Business Education World March 28 1964 142
- Fluno R. Y. “Group Case Study Method in Political Education.” School and Society 95 March 18 1967 188 191
- “The Case Method of Instruction.” Frazer C. E. New York McGraw-Hill 1931
- Healy W. “The Contributions of Case Studies to Sociology.” American Sociological Society Publications 18 147 155
- Mackenzie G. N. “Process of Innovation: Case Studies.” NEA Journal 56 December 1967 26 28
- “The Case Method at the Harvard Business School.” McNair Malcolm P. New York McGraw-Hill 1954
- Nicholson Scott “Training Managers By the Case Method.” Management Record 18 4 April 1956 118 120 147 150
- Perlman Helen H. “Social Casework: A Problem Solving Process.” Chicago The University of Chicago Press 1957
- Pigors Paul Pigors Faith “Case Method in Human Relations.” New York McGraw-Hill 1961
- Scott Lyndell “The Function of Field Work in Professional Education.” Social Service Review 25 4 December 1951
- Sperle D. Henryetta “The Case Method Technique in Professional Training.” New York Columbia University Press 1933
- “Team Approach Urged in Medical Education.” Science Newsletter 88 24 July 10 1965