This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
On the Direct Injection of Supercritical and Superheated H 2 O into ICEs: The Role of the Injector Geometry
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published June 14, 2022 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
The transition to electric vehicles in the transportation sector still faces multiple technological challenges and large investments as regards both vehicle design and vehicle charging infrastructure. Therefore, internal combustion engines still play a role in such a sector, making the engine improvements, in terms of pollutant emissions and efficiency, essential to mitigate the impact of human activities on the environment. One of the possible approaches to improve the efficiency of internal combustion engines is the recovery of the engine exhaust heat, from both the hot exhaust gases and the engine cooling system.
In recent years, among the energy recovery strategies, the use of direct injection of H2O under supercritical and superheated thermodynamic states has been explored. Such a technique uses pressurized water recovered from the exhaust gases, heated to high temperature by using the engine exhaust heat and re-injected into the engine combustion chamber. This results in higher in-chamber pressure, which increases the engine work and efficiency.
The injector geometry is a key component of the process, as it determines the structure of the resulting under-expanded jet and the in-chamber flow field, thus affecting the jet interaction with combustion. In this work, three different injector geometries, namely an axial, an open-nozzle and a 4-holes injector, and two injected fluids, i.e. supercritical water and superheated steam, have been considered in order to highlight the advantages and drawbacks of each of them. To this end, a CFD model of a 4-stroke spark ignition internal combustion engine has been used. The results show that the injected supercritical water penetrates faster compared to superheated steam for all three injector geometries. The 4-holes and the open-nozzle injectors present the shortest and the longest penetration time, respectively, with both injected fluids. Besides, the 4-holes injector has given the highest TKE increase, followed by the axial injector and the open nozzle injector. The TKE is, for all cases, three orders of magnitude higher than the case without injection.
CitationCantiani, A., Viggiano, A., and Magi, V., "On the Direct Injection of Supercritical and Superheated H2O into ICEs: The Role of the Injector Geometry," SAE Technical Paper 2022-37-0002, 2022, https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-37-0002.
- Kalghatgi , G. Is it Really the end of Internal Combustion Engines and Petroleum in Transport? Applied Energy 225 2018 965 974 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.076
- Jadhao , J.S. and Thombare , D.G. Review on Exhaust Gas Heat Recovery for I.C. Engine International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology (IJEIT) 2 12 2013 2277 3754
- Karvonen , M. , Kapoor , R. , Uusitalo , A. , and Ojanen , V. Technology Competition in the Internal Combustion Engine Waste Heat Recovery: A Patent Landscape Analysis Journal of Cleaner Production 1-9 2015 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.031
- Li , L. and Zhang , Z. Investigation on Steam Direct Injection in a Natural Gas Engine for Fuel Savings Energy 183 2019 958 970 10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.182
- Liu , Q. , Xie , M. , Fu , J. , Liu , J. et al. Cylinder Steam Injection (CSI) for Internal Combustion (IC) Engine Waste Heat Recovery (WHR) and Its Application on Natural Gas (NG) Engine Energy 214 2021 118892 10.1016/j.energy.2020.118892
- Cantiani , A. , Viggiano , A. , and Magi , V. How to Improve SI Engine Performances by Means of Supercritical Water Injection SAE Technical Paper 2019-24-0235 2019 10.4271/2019-24-0235
- Cantiani , A. , Viggiano , A. , and Magi , V. On Direct Injection of Supercritical Water into Spark Ignition Engines as a Strategy for Heat Recovery Energy Technology 9 8 2021 2100198 10.1002/ente.202100198
- Cantiani , A. , Viggiano , A. , and Magi , V. A CFD Model of Supercritical Water Injection for ICEs as Energy Recovery System SAE Technical Paper 2020-37-0001 2020 10.4271/2020-37-0001
- D’Errico , G. , Lucchini , T. , Onorati , A. , Mehl , M. et al. Development and Experimental Validation of a Combustion Model with Detailed Chemistry for Knock Predictions SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0938 2007 10.4271/2007-01-0938
- Launder , B.E. and Spalding , D.B. The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 3 1974 296 289 10.1016/0045-7825(74)90029-2
- ANSYS, Inc.
- Poinsot , T. and Veynante , D. Theoretical and Numerical Combustion 2nd New York McGraw-Hill 2005 978-1930217102
- Wang , H. , Yao , M. , and Reitz , R. Development of a Reduced Primary Reference Fuel Mechanism for Internal Combustion Engine Combustion Simulations Energy & Fuels 27 12 2013 7843 7853 10.1021/ef401992e
- Saxena , P. and Williams , F.A. Numerical and Experimental Studies of Ethanol Flames Proc. Combust. Inst. 31 1 2007 1149 1156 10.1016/j.proci.2006.08.097
- Metghalchi , M. and Keck , J.C. Burning Velocities of Mixtures of Air with Methanol, Isooctane, and Indolene at High Pressure and Temperature Combustion and Flame 48 1982 191 210 10.1016/0010-2180(82)90127-4
- Chase , M.W. NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables Washington, DC; New York American Chemical Society; American Institute of Physics for the National Institute of Standards and Technology 1998 10.18434/T42S31
- Hayder , M.E. , Varma , A.K. , and Bracco , F.V. A Limit to TDC Turbulence Intensity in Internal Combustion Engines Journal of Propulsion and Power 1 4 1985 300 308 10.2514/3.22797
- Tesfa , B. , Mishra , R. , Gu , F. , and Ball , A.D. Water Injection Effects on the Performance and Emission Characteristics of a CI Engine Operating with Biodiesel Renewable Energy 37 2012 10.1016/j.renene.2011.06.035