This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Optimization of Surfactant and Catalyst Modified Urea-Water Solution Formulation for Deposit Reduction in SCR Aftertreatment Systems
Technical Paper
2022-01-0541
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Selective Catalytic Reduction is the primary method of NOX emission abatement in lean-burn internal combustion. This process requires the decomposition of a 32.5 wt. % urea-water solution (UWS) to provide ammonia as a reducing agent for NOX, but at temperatures < 250 °C the injection of UWS is limited due to the formation of harmful deposits within an aftertreatment system and decreased ammonia production. Previous work has sufficiently demonstrated that the addition of surfactant and a urea/isocyanic acid (HNCO) decomposition catalyst to UWS can significantly decrease deposit formation within an aftertreatment system. The objective of this work was to further optimize the modified UWS formulation by investigating different types and concentrations of surfactants and titanium-based urea/HNCO catalyst. Because there is a correlation between surface tension and water evaporation, it was theorized that minimizing the surface tension of UWS would result in decreased deposit formation. Eighteen surfactants underwent a surface tension evaluation study to determine what type and concentration of surfactant is required to maximize surface tension reduction. Surfactant concentration was able to be reduced by 94% while maintaining surface tension reduction of over 50%. Six distinct catalysts were evaluated for urea decomposition activity utilizing SwRI’s Universal Synthetic Gas Reactor® (USGR®) to measure CO2 and NH3 evolution from solid mixtures of catalyst and urea. At a minimum, CO2 production increased by 298% when a titanium-based catalyst was present with urea with the highest performing catalyst increasing CO2 production by 540 % compared to pure urea. Deposit generation evaluations were then conducted utilizing the optimized catalyst and surfactant to determine the impact of catalyst and surfactant in UWS on deposit formation. Tailpipe NOx and PM emissions of the optimized UWS were compared against a conventional UWS on a 15 L low NOX engine. Both formulations met the CARB 2027 PM standards, but only the modified UWS met the CARB 2027 low NOX 0.02 g/hp-hr standard. The NOX composite FTP of the modified UWS and conventional UWS were 0.019 g/hp-hr NOX and 0.051 g/hp-hr respectively. The improved performance of the modified UWS was attributed to a more aggressive dosing strategy, which could be implemented due to reduced risk of urea deposit formation.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Wheeler, S., Seuser, G., Zavala, B., and Henry, C., "Optimization of Surfactant and Catalyst Modified Urea-Water Solution Formulation for Deposit Reduction in SCR Aftertreatment Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2022-01-0541, 2022, https://doi.org/10.4271/2022-01-0541.Also In
References
- Hartley , R. , Tonzetich , Z. , Wright , N. , and Henry , C. Investigation into Low-Temperature Urea-Water Solution Decomposition by Addition of Titanium Based Isocyanic Acid Hydrolysis Catalyst and Surfactant SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1316 2020 10.4271/2020-01-1316
- Hartley , R. , Henry , C. , Eakle , S. , and Tonzetich , Z. Deposit Reduction in SCR Aftertreatment Systems by Addition of Ti-Based Coordination Complex to UWS SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0313 2019 https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0313
- Webb , C. , Miller , J. , and Sharp , C. Diesel Catalyst Aging using a FOCAS® HGTR, a Diesel Burner System, to Simulate Engine-Based Aging SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-1218 2010 https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1218
- Lundström , V. , Andersson , B. , and Olsson , L. Urea Thermolysis Studied Under Flow Reactor Conditions Using DSC and FT-IR Chemical Engineering Journal 150 2009 544 550 10.1016/j.cej.2009.03.044
- Lundstrom , A. , Snelling , T. , Morsing , P. , Gabrielson , P. et al. Urea Decomposition and HNCO Hydrolysis Studied Over Titanium Dioxide, Fe-Beta and γ-Alumina Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 106 2011 273 279 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.05.010
- ECFR - Code of Federal Regulations https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40cfr1065_main_02.tpl
- California Air Resources Board California Air Resources Board Staff Current Assessment of the Technical Feasibility of Lower NOx Standards and Associated Test Procedures for 2022 and Subsequent Model Year Medium-Duty and Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines Sacramento, CA California Air Resources Board 2019
- Sharp , C. , Neely , G. , Zavala , B. , and Rao , S. "CARB Low NOX Stage 3 Program - Final Results and Summary," SAE Int J. Adv. & Curr. Prac. in Mobility 3 4 2021 1508 1525
- Zavala , B. , Sharp , C. , Neely , G. , and Rao , S. CARB Low NOX Stage 3 Program - Aftertreatment Evaluation and Down Selection SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1402 2020 https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1402
- Current Intelligence Bulletin 63: Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health April 2011