This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Optimization of Vehicle Shape Using Adjoint Approach Based on Steady-State and Transient Flow Solutions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 06, 2021 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: SAE WCX Digital Summit
In order to achieve the purpose of saving energy and reducing emission, the improvement of aerodynamic performance plays an increasingly crucial role for car manufacturers. Previous studies have confirmed the validity of gradient-based adjoint algorithm for its high efficiency in shape optimization. In this paper, two important aspects of adjoint approach were explored. One is vehicle aerodynamic optimization with multiple objectives, and the other is using time-averaged flow results as the primal solution, both are issues of high interest in recent applications.
First, adjoint shape optimization with steady-state and time-averaged flow simulations were respectively calculated and comparatively discussed based on a production SUV. The shape modifications of the two cases indicated that the impact of primal solution on design change could not be neglected, due to the different intrinsic codes of steady and transient turbulence models. Moreover, multi-objective optimization of reducing both drag and lift was carried out. Given the fact that the objective functions are usually conflicting with each other, it’s quite challenging to find the global optimal solution. But with appropriate parameter setting, a reasonable trade-off was finally achieved that total CD lowered by 8 counts and CL by 11 counts, which is beneficial for fuel economy as well as driving stability. In addition, the current difficulties existed in vehicle aerodynamic optimization were also proposed, serving as a guidance for further researches.
Results in this paper suggest that adjoint approach, with a long application history in a variety of disciplines and fields such as aeronautics, geography and turbomachinery, definitely will get a more promising and extensive utilization in automotive industry in the near future.
CitationZhou, H., Ren, C., Wu, H., Chen, Q. et al., "Multi-Objective Aerodynamic Optimization of Vehicle Shape Using Adjoint Approach Based on Steady-State and Transient Flow Solutions," SAE Technical Paper 2021-01-0945, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4271/2021-01-0945.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
|Unnamed Dataset 2|
- Han , T. , Hill , C. , and Jindal , S. Adjoint Method for Aerodynamic Shape Improvement in Comparison with Surface Pressure Gradient Method SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0151 2011 https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-0151
- Magazoni , F. , Maruyama , F. , Buscariolo , F. , Alves , J. et al. Aerodynamic Shape Improvement for Driver Side View Mirror of Hatchback Vehicle Using Adjoint Optimization Method SAE Technical Paper 2015-36-0156 2015 https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-36-0156
- Han , T. , Kaushik , S. , Karbon , K. , Leroy , B. et al. Adjoint-Driven Aerodynamic Shape Optimization based on a Combination of Steady State and Transient Flow Solutions SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1599 2016 https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1599
- Blacha , T. , Gregerson , M. , Islam , M. , and Bensler , H. Application of the Adjoint Method for Vehicle Aerodynamic Optimization SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1615 2016 https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1615
- Francesconi , I.G. , Miretti , L. , Lorefice , L. , Pitillo , I.F. Application of Adjoint Methods on Drag Reduction of Current Production Cars SAE Technical Paper 2018-37-0016 2018 https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-37-0016
- Zhang , Y. , Li , J. , Xu , C. , and Zhu , Z. Vehicle Aerodynamic Optimization: On a Combination of Adjoint Method and Efficient Global Optimization Algorithm SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars-Mech. Syst. 12 2 139 153 2019 https://doi.org/10.4271/06-12-02-0011
- Othmer , C. Adjoint Methods for Car Aerodynamics Journal of Mathematics in Industry 4 6 2014 10.1186/2190-5983-4-6
- Mader , C.A. , and Matins , J.R. Computing Stability Derivatives and Their Gradients for Aerodynamic Shape Optimization AIAA Journal 52 11 2014 10.2514/1.J052922
- Nørgaard , S.A. , Sigmund , O. , and Lazarov , B. Topology Optimization of Unsteady Flow Problems Using the Lattice Boltzmann Method Journal of Computational Physics 307 291 307 2016
- Ren , C. , Zhou , H. , Wu , H.B. , Chen , Q. et al. Aerodynamic Optimization of Vehicle Configuration Based on Adjoint Method SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0915 https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0915
- Fang , T. The Uniform Design: Application of Number-Theoretic Methods in Experimental Design Acta Math. Appl. Sinica 3 363 372 1980
- Fonseca , C.M. , and Fleming , P.J. Genetic Algorithms for Multi objective optimization: Formulation Discussion and Generalization International Conference on Genetic Algorithms 416 423 1993
- Cogotti , A. A Parametric Study of the Ground Effect of a Simplified Car Model SAE Technical Paper 980031 1998 https://doi.org/10.4271/980031
- Zitzler , E. , Deb , K. , Thiele , L. et al. Comparison of Multi Objective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results Evolutionary Computation 8 2 173 195 2000 10.1162/106365600568202
- Palin , R. , Johnston , V. , Johnson , S. , D’Hooge , A. et al. The Aerodynamic Development of the Tesla Model S - Part1: Overview SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0177 https://doi.org/10.4271/980031
- Feng , Q. , Luo , B.N. , Zhang , H.X. , Peng , H. , et al. Optimization of the Aerodynamic Lift and Drag of LYNK&CO 03+ with Simulation and Wind Tunnel Test SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0672
- Villiers , E. , and Othmer , C. Multi-Objective Adjoint Optimization of Intake Port Geometry SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0905 https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0905
- Verma , I. , Hill , C. , and Xu , M. Multi-Objective Adjoint Optimization of Flow-Bench Port Geometry SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0772 https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0772
- Menter , R. , Matyushenko , A. , and Lechner , R. Development of a Generalized k-ω Two-Equation Turbulence Model Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design 142 2018
- Buscariolo , F. , Magazoni , F. , Wolf , M. , Maruyama , F. et al. Analysis of Turbulence Models Applied to CFD Drag Simulations of a Small Hatchback Vehicle SAE Technical Paper 2016-36-0201 2016 https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-36-0201