This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
To Err Is Human: The Role of Human Derived Safety Metrics in an Age of Automated Vehicles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 06, 2021 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: SAE WCX Digital Summit
As industry races to complete technical development of automated driving systems (ADS), important questions are being raised about how to measure the safety of such systems and the overall safety of Automated Vehicles (AVs). Traffic safety engineers have for decades utilized metrics to assess the safety of human drivers and measurements such as Time To Collision (TTC) and Time Headway (THW) have proven to be a useful indicator of increased risk of an accident for human drivers.
But what if we can do better with AVs? Are human driving derived risk metrics meaningful for a self-driving vehicle? Recently, the Institute for Automated Mobility (IAM) published a set of metrics defined specifically for self-driving vehicles that provide a thorough assessment of the safety of an AV. While humans must use estimation and cautious judgement to make decisions, AVs can use precise measurement techniques via sensors and correlate multiple sources of data in real time. Utilizing information such as the reaction time of the ADS, the braking capability of the AV and more, the IAM proposed metrics allow for the assessment of the safety of an AV to be accurately measured, not as a notion of approximated risk, but as a binary calculation of safety.
In this paper we analyze, compare and contrast human driving, risk-oriented safety metrics with the more definitive metrics proposed for AVs. We answer important questions about the necessary evolution of human derived metrics to ensure they are meaningful in the assessment of the safety of an AV, as well as whether novel metrics proposed for AVs can be used to better understand and assess the safety performance of AVs when compared to historical safety measures. Our research proves that AV-based assessment metrics can provide better insight into the safety of both AVs and human drivers.
CitationWeast, J., Elli, M., and Alvarez, I., "To Err Is Human: The Role of Human Derived Safety Metrics in an Age of Automated Vehicles," SAE Technical Paper 2021-01-0875, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4271/2021-01-0875.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
- Mahmud , S. , Ferreira , L. , Hoque , S. , and Tavassoli , A. Application of Proximal Surrogate Indicators for Safety Evaluation: A Review of Recent Developments and Research Needs International Association of Traffic and Safety Devices 41 153 163 2017
- Evans , L. Driver Injury and Fatality Risk in Two-Car Crashes versus Mass Ration Inferred Using Newtonian Mechanics Accident Analysis & Prevention 609 616 1994
- Joksch , H.C. Velocity Change and Fatality Risk in a Crash - A Rule of Thumb Accident Analysis & Prevention 25 32 1993
- Hayward , J. 1971
- UNECE 2020
- Minderhoud , M.M. , and Bovy , P.H. Extended Time-to-Collision Measures for Road Traffic Safety Assessment Accident Analysis & Prevention 89 97 2001
- DMV , N. http://dmv.ny.gov/dmanual/chapter08-manual.htm
- DOT , U. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.gov/files/810981.pdf
- Vahidi , A. , and Eskandarian , A. Research Advances in Intelligent Collision Avoidance and Adaptive Cruise Control IEEE Transportation Intelligence Systems 143 153 2003
- Yi , H. Design of a Full-Range ACC with Collision Avoidance/Mitigation Braking IFAC Proceedings 2007
- Balsa-Barreiro , F. et al. GIS Mapping of Driving Behavior Based on Naturalistic Driving Data ISPRS International Journal of Geo Information 226 234 2019
- Wu , P. Crashes and Crash-Surrogate Events: Exploratory Modeling with Naturalistic Driving Data Accident Analysis and Prevention 507 516 2012
- Ghasemzadeh , A.M. Quantifying Regional Heterogenity Effect on Drivers Speeding Behavior Using SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Data Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 29 40 2019
- Precht , K.J. et al. Effects of Driving Anger on Driver Behavior - Results from Naturalistic Driving Data Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behavior 75 92 2017
- ISO https://www.iso.org/standard/75786.html
- Najm , W.G. , Smith , J.D. and Yanagisawa , M. 2007
- B. e. a. McGehee Driver Reaction Time in Crash Avoidance Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Los Angeles 2000
- Bansal , M. , Krizhevsky , A. , and Ogale , A. 2018
- Wishart , J. , Como , S. , Elli , M. et al. Driving Safety Performance Assessment Metrics for ADS-Equipped Vehicles SAE Int. J. Adv. & Curr. Prac. in Mobility 2 5 2881 2899 2020 https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1206
- Shalev-Shwartz , S. ArXiv, 2017
- Lee , D.N. A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information About Time-to-Collision Perception 437 459 1976
- Gettman , D. and Head , L. 2003
- Barickman , F. , Mazzae , E. , Forkenbrock , G. , and Baldwin , G. 2003
- Paddock , M. 2016
- Mu , N. ArXiv, 2019
- Mattas , C.B. Fuzzy Surrogate Safety Metrics for Real-Time Assessment of Rear-End Collision Risk. A Study Based on Empirical Observations Accident Analysis & Prevention 2020
- Lutge , C. The German Ethics Code for Automated and Connected Driving Philosophy & Technology 2017
- Lee , D.N. A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information About Time-to-Collision Percepttion 437 459 1976
- Geiger , A. , Lenz , P. , and Urtasun , R. http://cvlibs.net/publications/geiger2012cvpr.pdf