This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Comparison between Different Modelling Methods of Secondary Path to Maximize Control Effect for Active Engine Mounts
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 06, 2021 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: SAE WCX Digital Summit
Active engine mount (AEM) is an effective approach which can optimize the noise, vibration and harshness (NVH) performance of vehicles. The filtered-x-least-mean-squares (FxLMS) algorithm is widely applicated for vibration attenuation in AEMs. However, the performance of FxLMS algorithm can be deteriorated without an accurate secondary path estimation. First, this paper models the secondary path using finite impulse response (FIR) model, infinite impulse response (IIR) model and back propagation (BP) neural network model and the model errors of which are compared to determine the most accurate and robust modeling method. After that, the influence of operation frequency on accuracy of the secondary path model is analyzed through simulation approach. Then, the impact of reference signal mismatch on the control effect is demonstrated to study the robustness of FxLMS algorithm. Finally, a test bench is established to optimize other control parameters and validate the performance of the improved FxLMS control algorithm. The experiment result indicates that the FxLMS control algorithm combined with optimized parameters ensures excellent performance on active vibration isolation and can quickly adapt to the changes of excitation.
CitationZhou, Z., Guo, R., and Xu, S., "Comparison between Different Modelling Methods of Secondary Path to Maximize Control Effect for Active Engine Mounts," SAE Technical Paper 2021-01-0668, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4271/2021-01-0668.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
|Unnamed Dataset 2|
- Akanda , A. , and Adulla , C. Application of Evolutionary Computation in Automotive Powertrain Mount Tuning Shock & Vibration 13 2 85 102 2006
- Khameneifar , F. , Arzanpour , S. , and Moallem , M. Piezo-Actuated Active Decoupler Hydraulic Engine Mount ASME 2010 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition 195 200 2010
- Yoshiharu , N. et al. Development of an Active Control Engine Mount System Vehicle System Dynamics 32 2-3 185 198 1999
- Ushijima , T. Active Engine Mount with Piezo-Actuator for Vibration Control 1993
- Morgan , D.R. History, Applications, and Subsequent Development of the FXLMS Algorithm [DSP History] IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 30 3 172 176 2013
- Guo , R. , Wei , X.K. , and Gao , J. Extended Filtered-x-Least-Mean-Squares Algorithm for an Active Control Engine Mount Based on Acceleration Error Signal Advances in Mechanical Engineering 9 9 2017
- Guo , R. et al. An FxLMS Controller for Active Control Engine Mount with Experimental Secondary Path Identification WCX™ 20: SAE World Congress Experience 2020
- Hausberg , F. et al. Combination of Map-Based and Adaptive Feedforward Control Algorithms for Active Engine Mounts Journal of Vibration & Control 2016
- Guo , R. , Wei , X.K. , and Gao , J. An Improved PID Controller Based on Particle Swarm Optimization for Active Control Engine Mount WCX™ 17: SAE World Congress Experience 2017
- Naseri , R. et al. A Robust Active Control Scheme for Automotive Engine Vibration Based on Disturbance Observer ISA Transactions 100 13 27 2020
- Hausberg , F. et al. Experimental and Analytical Study of Secondary Path Variations in Active Engine Mounts Journal of Sound & Vibration 340 22 38 2015
- Guo , R. et al. Parametric Identification Study of an Active Engine Mount: Combination of Finite Element Analysis and Experiment Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 233 2 427 439 2019