This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Case Study in DOC OBD Limit Parts’ Performance and Detection
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 06, 2021 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: SAE WCX Digital Summit
The reduction of automotive emissions is instrumental in the fight against air pollution and its impact on global warming. This realization has empowered governments around the world to mandate lower levels of vehicle emissions requiring the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to implement advanced aftertreatment technologies in their applications. Achieving emission levels as low as SULEV30 or SULEV20 would have been impossible only a couple of decades ago, however, these lower levels of emissions are now a possibility through advanced control strategies and aftertreatment systems. As a part of this mandate to lower emissions, OEMs are also continuously monitoring the health and performance of their aftertreatment and control components. The implementation of On Board Diagnostics (OBD) ensures that control systems are functioning robustly and the emission levels are achieved and maintained to high mileages for the life of the vehicle. To develop a robust OBD detection strategy, OEMs often create limit or threshold parts that mimic the failed part at the OBD detection limits. There are various methods for creating a limit part that would emit pollutant at the OBD limits.
In an effort to study different approaches to Diesel Oxidation Catalyst (DOC) limit part fabrication and their corresponding performance and detection, various DOCs were created each representing a unique failure mechanism. The emissions were measured and the impact of the damage on the emissions performance and OBD detection was investigated. From this, it was determined that only the limit DOCs which were created by cutting (volume reduction) and aging, have sufficient separation between their failed state and their acceptable emission performance, to be adequate for OBD activity during development.
CitationAhari, H., Mates, A., Linihan, M., Wilson, J. et al., "A Case Study in DOC OBD Limit Parts’ Performance and Detection," SAE Technical Paper 2021-01-0438, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4271/2021-01-0438.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
- Peters , M. OBD2 Compliance Validation SAE Technical Paper 1993-25-0434 1993 https://doi.org/10.4271/1993-25-0434
- Nanjundaswamy , H.K. , Deussen , J. , Van Sickle , R. , Tomazic , D. et al. OBD Diagnostic Strategies for LEVIII Exhaust Gas Aftertreatment Concepts SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1040 2015 https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1040
- Dadam , S.R. , Jentz , R. , and Meissner , H. Diagnostic Evaluation of Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) System on Gasoline Electric Hybrid Vehicle SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0902 2020 https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0902
- State of California Air Resources Board 2012
- van Nieuwstadt , M. , Upadhyay , D. , Yuan , F. Diagnostics for Diesel Oxidation Catalysts SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3602 2005 https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-3602
- Vakiti , K. , Deussen , J. , Pilger , C. , Nanjundaswamy , H.K. et al. In-Use Compliance Opportunity for Diesel Powertrains SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0877 2018 https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0877