This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Reconstruction of Passenger Vehicle Underride: An Analysis of Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Semitrailer Rear Underride Crash Data
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: Automotive Technical Papers
Although semitrailer underride collisions have a relatively high risk of injury, the significant body of data developed through crash testing has not been previously analyzed in a single study to be readily used by the accident reconstructionist. This study examined the publicly available IIHS semitrailer rear underride tests (N = 35). The crash data were classified as full-width (n = 9), 50% overlap (n = 11), and 30% overlap (n = 15). A 2010 Chevrolet Malibu impacted the rear underride guard of a stationary semitrailer at 35 mph. Several collision parameters, that is, vehicle longitudinal, lateral, and vertical delta-Vs, guard deformations, and occupant compartment intrusions were characterized and compared between different overlap groups. The coefficient of restitution and impact duration were also quantified and their relationship with different underride parameters was explored. The accuracy of the “black box” data for different overlap groups was evaluated. For N = 16 tests (n = 9 full-width; n = 1, 50% overlap; n = 6, 30% overlap), the vehicle delta-Vs captured independently by the Malibu’s event data recorders (EDRs) were validated against the instrumentation data. Finally, underride collision parameters were combined to estimate total crush energy and vehicle closing speed.
Full-width overlap crashes showed higher longitudinal delta-Vs but lower lateral and vertical delta-Vs than the 30% overlap collisions. The 30% overlap group had significantly higher intrusions. No intrusion was observed at (1) vehicle accelerations over 20 g; (2) guard deformations below 28 cm; and (3) vehicle excursions below 120 cm. The 30% overlap crashes also demonstrated lower restitution and higher impact durations than the full-width overlap group. The coefficient of restitution and impact duration indicated strong correlations with vehicle forward excursion. Analysis of EDR data suggested that in full-width overlap crashes, the vehicle delta-Vs were recorded with high accuracy (RMS error: 0.5 mph); whereas, in 30% overlap crashes they were consistently overestimated (RMS error: 3.9 mph). The accident reconstructionist should consider these accuracy issues when relying upon EDR data to analyze underride collisions.
This study provided baseline data for several collision parameters during offset underride. Such data leads to a more accurate reconstruction of underride, and therefore a better understanding of occupant biomechanics. This is also helpful to improve underride protection devices and enhance passenger vehicle safety.
CitationAtarod, M., "Reconstruction of Passenger Vehicle Underride: An Analysis of Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Semitrailer Rear Underride Crash Data," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-5091, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-5091.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
- “Rear Impact Guards,” Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 223, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 49 CFR 571.223, 1996.
- “Rear Impact Protection,” Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 224, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations 49 CFR 571.224, 1996.
- Tavakoli, M., Valliappan, P., Pranesh, A., and Savage, C. , “Estimation of Frontal Crush Stiffness Coefficients for Car-to-Heavy Truck Underride Collisions,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0731, 2007, https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-0731.
- Goodwin, V., Martin, D., Sackett, R., Schaefer, G. et al. , “Vehicle and Occupant Response in Low Speed Car to Barrier Override Impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-0442, 1999, https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-0442.
- Blower, D., and Campbell, K. , “Underride in Fatal Rear-End Truck Crashes,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-3521, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-3521.
- Tomassoni, J.E. , “Additional Insights to the Underride Problem and Concerns,” Presented at the in SAE Heavy Vehicle Underride Protection TOPTEC, Palm Springs, California, Apr. 15-16, 1997.
- Enz, B.E., Oshida, Y., Head, D.N., Tomassoni, J. et al. , “Mathematical Approach to Side Underride Vehicular Accidents,” Mathematical Modeling and Scientific Computing 13(1-2):136-151, 2001.
- Tanner, B., Chen, F., Wiechel, J., and Brown, D. , “Vehicle and Occupant Response in Heavy Truck to Car Low-Speed Rear Impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 970120, 1997, https://doi.org/10.4271/970120.
- Boucher, D., and Davis, D. , “Trailer Underride Protection - A Canadian Perspective,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-3522, 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-3522.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration , “Final Report of a 1993 Honda Civic DX into Heavy Truck Rigid Rear Underride Guard in Support of CRASH3 Damage Algorithm Reformation,” DOT HS 808 228, June 1993.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration , “Final Report of a 1990 Ford Taurus into Heavy Truck Rigid Rear Underride Guard in Support of CRASH3 Damage Algorithm Reformation,” DOT HS 808 231, June 1993.
- Navin, F.D. , “Bumper Underride Crash Test Series,” Synectics Road Safety Research Corp., Mar. 1997.
- Marine, M., Wirth, J., and Thomas, T. , “Crush Energy Considerations in Override/Underride Impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0556, 2002, https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-0556.
- Marine, M., Wirth, J., Peters, B., and Thomas, T. , “Override/Underride Crush Energy: Results from Vertically Offset Barrier Impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1202, 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-1202.
- Croteau, J., Werner, S., Habberstad, J., and Golliher, J. , “Determining Closing Speed in Rear Impact Collisions with Offset and Override,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-1170, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-1170.
- Tumbas, N., and Smith, R. , “Measuring Protocol for Quantifying Vehicle Damage from Energy Point of View,” SAE Technical Paper 880072, 1988, https://doi.org/10.4271/880072.
- Mariolani, J., Schmutzler, L., Arruda, A., Occhipinti, S. et al. , “Impact Project: Searching for the Solution to the Underride Problem,” SAE Technical Paper 982755, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/982755.
- Mariolani, J., Santos, P., Stellute, J., and Mazarin, J. , “First Crash Test of the New Conceptual Pliers Underride Guard,” SAE Technical Paper 982879, 1998, https://doi.org/10.4271/982879.
- Cofone, J., and Craig, V. , “Automobile/Tractor-Trailer Side Underride Crash Tests,” Accident Reconstruction Journal 21(2):21-27, 2011.
- Bogges, B.M., Morr, D.R., Peterman, E.K., and Wiechel, J.F. , “Experimental Evaluation of Underride Analysis Techniques and Empirical Validation of a New Analytical Technique,” Accident Analysis and Prevention 42:140-152, 2010.
- Trego, A., Enz, B., and Head, D. , “Analysis of Side Underride Crashes Misconceptions and the Problems,” Accident Investigation Quarterly 27:17-19, 2001.
- Campbell, K. , “Energy Basis for Collision Severity,” SAE Technical Paper 740565, 1974, https://doi.org/10.4271/740565.
- Trego, A., Enz, B., Head, D., and Oshida, Y. , “A Scientific Approach to Tractor-Trailer Side Underride Analysis,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-0178, 2003, https://doi.org/10.4271/2003-01-0178.
- Andrews, D. and Limpert, R. , “Car-Trailer Under-Ride Crash Test Analysis,” pcbrake 1:8, 2010.
- Daily, J. and Strickland, R. , “Analysis of Four Staged Crashes of Passenger Vehicles into a Semi-Trailer,” Special Problems in Traffic Crash Reconstruction, Institute of Police Technology and Management, Apr. 25-29, 2005.
- Badger, J.E. , “Trailer Underride-Another Look,” Accident Reconstruction Journal 5(5), 1993.
- Badger, J.E. , “Trailer Underride Test,” Accident Reconstruction Journal 9(6), 1997.
- Castadena, R., Jones, W., Shattuck, M., Mills, D. et al. , “Trailer Side Underride Crash Testing: Relating Collision Damage to Impact Speed,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0614, 2012, https://doi.org/10.4271/2012-01-0614.
- Midwest Institute for Transportation Safety, Indianapolis, IN., 2346 S. Lynhurst Dr., Ste. E107.
- https://techdata.iihs.org/; Date of access 19 Aug 2019 - 24 Dec 19.
- IIHS , “Semi-Trailer Underride Evaluation Crash Test Protocol (Version I),” Arlington, VA, Aug. 2016.
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety , “Guidelines for Using the UMTRI ATD Positioning Procedure for ATD and Seat Positioning (Version V),” Arlington, VA, 2004.
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety , “Moderate Overlap Frontal Crashworthiness Evaluation Crash Test Protocol (Version XVI),” Arlington, VA, 2016.
- Society of Automotive Engineers , “Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice J1100; Motor Vehicle Dimensions,” Warrendale, PA, 2009.
- Insurance Institute for Highway Safety , “Frontal Offset Crashworthiness Evaluation Offset Barrier Crash Test Protocol (Version XIII),” Arlington, VA, 2008.
- U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration , “Analysis of Rear Underride in Fatal Truck Crashes, 2008,” Report DOT HS 811 652, 2012.
- Allen, K. , “The Effectiveness of Underride Guards for Heavy Trailers,” Report No. DOT HS 811 375. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC, 2010.
- Daily, J., Strickland, R., and Daily, J. , “Crush Analysis with Under-Rides and the Coefficient of Restitution,” Institute of Police Technology and Management’s 24th Annual Special Problems in Traffic Crash Reconstruction, 2006.
- Brumbelow, M. , “Crash Test Performance of Large Truck Rear Underride Guards,” ESV 11-0074, 2011.
- Ydenius, A. , “Influence of Crash Pulse Characteristics on Injury Risk in Frontal Impacts Based on Real-Life Crashes,” Traffic Inj Prev. 11(5):526-534, 2010.
- Linder, A., Avery, M., Krafft, M., and Kullgren, A. , “Change of Velocity and Pulse Characteristics in Rear Impacts: Real World and Vehicle Tests Data,” NHTSA Paper No. 285, 2001.
- Tanner, C. , “Coefficients of Restitution for Low and Moderate Speed Impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0891, 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0891.
- United States Government Accountability Office - Report to Congressional Requesters, “Truck Underride Guards-Improved Data Collection, Inspections, and Research Needed,” GAO-19-264, 2019.
- NHTSA Rear Impact Guards , Rear Impact Protection. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). 49 CFR Part 571, Docket No. NHTSA-2015-0118, 2015.
- Atarod, M. , “Biomechanics of Passenger Vehicle Underride: An Analysis of IIHS Crash Test Data,” SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0525, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0525.
- German, A., Comeau, J.-L., Monk, B., McClafferty, K. et al. , “The Use of Event Data Recorders in the Analysis of Real World Crashes,” in Proceedings of the Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference XII, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 2001.
- Comeau, J.-L., German, A., and Floyd, D. , “Comparison of Crash Pulse Data from Motor Vehicle Event Data Recorders and Laboratory Instrumentation,” in Proceedings of the Canadian Multidisciplinary Road Safety Conference XIV, Ottawa, Ontario, 2004.
- Struble, D., Welsh, K., and Struble, J. , “Crush Energy Assessment in Frontal Underride/Override Crashes,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0105, 2009, https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0105.