This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Assessment of In-Use Solid Particle Number Measurement Systems against Laboratory Systems
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: Automotive Technical Papers
Euro VI regulations in Europe and its adaptors recently extended the regulation to include Particle Number (PN) for in-use conformity testing. However, the in-use PN Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) is still evolving and has higher measurement uncertainty when compared against laboratory-grade PN systems. The PN systems for laboratory require a condensation particle counter (CPC). Thus, in this study, a CPC-based Horiba PN-PEMS was selected for performance evaluation against the laboratory-grade PN systems. This study was divided into four phases. The first two phases’ measurements were conducted from the Constant Volume Sampler (CVS) tunnel where the brake-specific particle number (BSPN) levels of 1010-12 and 1013 (#/bhp-h) were measured from the engines equipped with diesel particulate filter (DPF) and without DPF, respectively. In comparison against PN systems, PN-PEMS, on average, reported 14% lower BSPN from 82 various tests for the BSPN levels of 1010-11. In the case of engine-out (EO) BSPN levels (1013), PN-PEMS, on an average, reported 8% lower from 66 tests. The short-term repeatability and reproducibility of the solid particles measured by PN-PEMS were evaluated with the two non-DPF engines in the second phase of the study. Repeatability and reproducibility were below 3.5% and 15%, respectively. In the third phase, PN-PEMS measured from the raw location and PN system measured from the partial flow sampling system (PFSS). For 53 different tests of 1010-11 BSPN levels, PN-PEMS, on average, reported 15% lower measurements. In the final phase, PN-PEMS performance was evaluated on the chassis dynamometer where it reported 10-20% higher than the PN system. A diffusion charger (DC) PN-PEMS utilized in the final phase, reported two to six times higher PN due to overestimation of urea solid particles whenever selective catalyst reduction (SCR) temperature was above 250°C. From more than 200 various test data for this overall study, on average, Horiba PN-PEMS reported a 12% lower BSPN than the laboratory-grade PN system.
- M. Yusuf Khan - Cummins Inc.
- Meet Patel - Cummins Inc.
- Nathan Scott - Cummins Inc.
- Chet Mun Liew - Cummins Inc.
- Chuanlun Peng - Cummins East Asia Research & Development
- Wenzheng Luo - Cummins East Asia Research & Development
- Montajir Rahman - Horiba Instruments Inc.
- Nathan Gramlich - Horiba Instruments Inc.
- Jeremy Eames - Horiba Instruments Inc.
- J. Adam Phillips - West Virginia University
CitationKhan, M., Patel, M., Scott, N., Liew, C. et al., "Assessment of In-Use Solid Particle Number Measurement Systems against Laboratory Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-5074, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-5074.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- Oberdörster, G. , “Significance of Particle Parameters in the Evaluation of Exposure-Dose-Response Relationships of Inhaled Particles,” Inhal Toxicol. 8(suppl):73-89, 1996.
- Donaldson, K.X.Y.W. , Li, X.Y. , and MacNee, W. , “Ultrafine (Nanometre) Particle Mediated Lung Injury,” Journal of Aerosol Science 29(5-6):553-560, 1998.
- Ferin, J. , Oberdorster, G. , and Penny, D. , “Pulmonary Retention of Ultrafine and Fine Particles in Rats,” Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 6:535-542, 1992.
- Bakand, S. , Hayes, A. , and Dechsakulthorn, F. , “Nanoparticles: A Review of Particle Toxicology Following Inhalation Exposure,” Inhal. Toxicol. 24:125-135, 2012.
- HEI Diesel Epidemiology Panel , “Executive Summary. Diesel Emissions and Lung Cancer: An Evaluation of Recent Epidemiological Evidence for Quantitative Risk Assessment,” HEI Special Report 19, Health Effects Institute, Boston, MA, 2015.
- Shinozaki, O. , Shinoyama, E. , and Saito, K. , “Trapping Performance of Diesel Particulate Filters,” SAE Technical Paper 900107, 1990, https://doi.org/10.4271/900107.
- Giechaskiel, B. , Mamakos, A. , Andersson, J. , Dilara, P. et al. , “Measurement of Automotive Nonvolatile Particle Number Emissions within the European Legislative Framework: A Review,” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46:719-749, 2012.
- Giechaskiel, B. , Dilara, P. , and Andersson, J. , “Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) Light-Duty Inter-Laboratory Exercise: Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Particle Number Method,” Aerosol Sci. Technol. 42:528-543, 2008.
- Giechaskiel, B. and Drossinos, Y. , “Theoretical Investigation of Volatile Removal Efficiency of Particle Number Measurement Systems,” SAE Int. J. Engines 3(1):1140-1151, 2010, https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1304.
- California Air Resources Board , “CARB Staff Current Assessment of the Technical Feasibility of Lower NOx Standards and Associated Test Procedures for 2022 and Subsequent Model Year MD- and HDDEs,” 2019.
- Giechaskiel, B. , Riccobono, F. , Mendoza-Villafuerte, P. , and Grigoratos, T. , “Particle Number (PN)-Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) Heavy Duty Vehicles Evaluation Phase at the Joint Research Centre (JRC),” Publications Office, Luxembourg, 2016.
- Giechaskiel, B. , Schwelberger, M. , Delacroix, C. , Marchetti, M. et al. , “Experimental Assessment of Solid Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) for Heavy-Duty Vehicles Applications,” J. Aerosol Sci. 123:161-170, 2018.
- Giechaskiel, B. , Bonnel, P. , Perujo, A. , and Dilara, P. , “Solid Particle Number (SPN) Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) in the European Legislation: A Review,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:4819, 2019.
- Giechaskiel, B. , Riccobono, F. , Mendoza, P. , and Grigoratos, T. , “Particle Number (PN)-Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS): Heavy Duty Vehicles Evaluation Phase at the Joint Research Centre (JRC),” EUR 28256 EN, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2788/052796.
- Giechaskiel, B. , “Real Driving Emissions (RDE): Particle Number (PN) Portable Measurement Systems (PEMS) Calibration,” EUR 29036 EN, JRC110424, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, ISBN: 978-92-79-77482-9, https://doi.org/10.2760/553725.
- Khan, M.Y. , Sharma, S. , Liew, C.M. et al. , “Comparison of Full Flow Dilution, Partial Flow Dilution, and Raw Exhaust Particle Number Measurements,” Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 4:103-112, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40825-018-0086-6.
- Khan, M.Y. , Shimpi, S.A. , and Martin, W.T. , Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 1:298, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40825-015-0026-7.
- Schwelberger, M. , Mamakos, A. , Fierz, M. , and Giechaskiel, B. , “Experimental Assessment of an Electrofilter and a Tandem Positive-Negative Corona Charger for the Measurement of Charged Nanoparticles Formed in Selective Catalytic Reduction Systems,” Appl. Sci. 9:1051, 2019.
- Vaaraslahti, K. , Laitinen, A. , and Keskinen, J. , “Spray Charging of Droplets in a Wet Scrubber,” J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 52(2):175-180, 2002.