This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Assessment of In-Use Solid Particle Number Measurement Systems against Laboratory Systems
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 01, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: Automotive Technical Papers
Euro VI regulations in Europe and its adaptors recently extended the regulation to include Particle Number (PN) for in-use conformity testing. However, the in-use PN Portable Emissions Measurement System (PEMS) is still evolving and has higher measurement uncertainty when compared against laboratory-grade PN systems. The PN systems for laboratory require a condensation particle counter (CPC). Thus, in this study, a CPC-based Horiba PN-PEMS was selected for performance evaluation against the laboratory-grade PN systems. This study was divided into four phases. The first two phases’ measurements were conducted from the Constant Volume Sampler (CVS) tunnel where the brake-specific particle number (BSPN) levels of 1010-12 and 1013 (#/bhp-h) were measured from the engines equipped with diesel particulate filter (DPF) and without DPF, respectively. In comparison against PN systems, PN-PEMS, on average, reported 14% lower BSPN from 82 various tests for the BSPN levels of 1010-11. In the case of engine-out (EO) BSPN levels (1013), PN-PEMS, on an average, reported 8% lower from 66 tests. The short-term repeatability and reproducibility of the solid particles measured by PN-PEMS were evaluated with the two non-DPF engines in the second phase of the study. Repeatability and reproducibility were below 3.5% and 15%, respectively. In the third phase, PN-PEMS measured from the raw location and PN system measured from the partial flow sampling system (PFSS). For 53 different tests of 1010-11 BSPN levels, PN-PEMS, on average, reported 15% lower measurements. In the final phase, PN-PEMS performance was evaluated on the chassis dynamometer where it reported 10-20% higher than the PN system. A diffusion charger (DC) PN-PEMS utilized in the final phase, reported two to six times higher PN due to overestimation of urea solid particles whenever selective catalyst reduction (SCR) temperature was above 250°C. From more than 200 various test data for this overall study, on average, Horiba PN-PEMS reported a 12% lower BSPN than the laboratory-grade PN system.
- M. Yusuf Khan - Cummins Inc.
- Meet Patel - Cummins Inc.
- Nathan Scott - Cummins Inc.
- Chet Mun Liew - Cummins Inc.
- Chuanlun Peng - Cummins East Asia Research & Development
- Wenzheng Luo - Cummins East Asia Research & Development
- Montajir Rahman - Horiba Instruments Inc.
- Nathan Gramlich - Horiba Instruments Inc.
- Jeremy Eames - Horiba Instruments Inc.
- J. Adam Phillips - West Virginia University
CitationKhan, M., Patel, M., Scott, N., Liew, C. et al., "Assessment of In-Use Solid Particle Number Measurement Systems against Laboratory Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-5074, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-5074.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
|Unnamed Dataset 2|
- Oberdörster , G. Significance of Particle Parameters in the Evaluation of Exposure-Dose-Response Relationships of Inhaled Particles Inhal Toxicol. 8 suppl 73 89 1996
- Donaldson , K.X.Y.W. , Li , X.Y. , and MacNee , W. Ultrafine (Nanometre) Particle Mediated Lung Injury Journal of Aerosol Science 29 5-6 553 560 1998
- Ferin , J. , Oberdorster , G. , and Penny , D. Pulmonary Retention of Ultrafine and Fine Particles in Rats Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 6 535 542 1992
- Bakand , S. , Hayes , A. , and Dechsakulthorn , F. Nanoparticles: A Review of Particle Toxicology Following Inhalation Exposure Inhal. Toxicol. 24 125 135 2012
- HEI Diesel Epidemiology Panel 2015
- Shinozaki , O. , Shinoyama , E. , and Saito , K. Trapping Performance of Diesel Particulate Filters SAE Technical Paper 900107 1990 https://doi.org/10.4271/900107
- Giechaskiel , B. , Mamakos , A. , Andersson , J. , Dilara , P. et al. Measurement of Automotive Nonvolatile Particle Number Emissions within the European Legislative Framework: A Review Aerosol Sci. Technol. 46 719 749 2012
- Giechaskiel , B. , Dilara , P. , and Andersson , J. Particle Measurement Programme (PMP) Light-Duty Inter-Laboratory Exercise: Repeatability and Reproducibility of the Particle Number Method Aerosol Sci. Technol. 42 528 543 2008
- Giechaskiel , B. and Drossinos , Y. Theoretical Investigation of Volatile Removal Efficiency of Particle Number Measurement Systems SAE Int. J. Engines 3 1 1140 1151 2010 https://doi.org/10.4271/2010-01-1304
- California Air Resources Board 2019
- Giechaskiel , B. , Riccobono , F. , Mendoza-Villafuerte , P. , and Grigoratos , T. 2016
- Giechaskiel , B. , Schwelberger , M. , Delacroix , C. , Marchetti , M. et al. Experimental Assessment of Solid Particle Number Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) for Heavy-Duty Vehicles Applications J. Aerosol Sci. 123 161 170 2018
- Giechaskiel , B. , Bonnel , P. , Perujo , A. , and Dilara , P. Solid Particle Number (SPN) Portable Emissions Measurement Systems (PEMS) in the European Legislation: A Review Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16 4819 2019
- Giechaskiel , B. , Riccobono , F. , Mendoza , P. , and Grigoratos , T. 2016 https://doi.org/10.2788/052796
- Giechaskiel , B. 2018 https://doi.org/10.2760/553725
- Khan , M.Y. , Sharma , S. , Liew , C.M. et al. Comparison of Full Flow Dilution, Partial Flow Dilution, and Raw Exhaust Particle Number Measurements Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 4 103 112 2018 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40825-018-0086-6
- Khan , M.Y. , Shimpi , S.A. , and Martin , W.T. Emiss. Control Sci. Technol. 1 298 2015 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40825-015-0026-7
- Schwelberger , M. , Mamakos , A. , Fierz , M. , and Giechaskiel , B. Experimental Assessment of an Electrofilter and a Tandem Positive-Negative Corona Charger for the Measurement of Charged Nanoparticles Formed in Selective Catalytic Reduction Systems Appl. Sci. 9 1051 2019
- Vaaraslahti , K. , Laitinen , A. , and Keskinen , J. Spray Charging of Droplets in a Wet Scrubber J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 52 2 175 180 2002