This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Relationship between Turbulent Burning Velocity and Karlovitz Number under EGR Conditions
Technical Paper
2020-01-2051
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to find a universal law to predict a turbulent burning velocity under various operating conditions and engine specifications. This paper presents the relationship between turbulent burning velocity and Karlovitz number. The turbulent burning velocity was measured using a single-cylinder gasoline engine, which has an external Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) system. In the experiment, various engine operating parameters, e.g. engine speed and EGR rates, and various engine specifications, i.e. different types of intake ports were tested. Karlovitz number was calculated with Three Dimensional Computational Fluid Dynamics (3D-CFD) and detailed chemical reaction calculation, which condition was based on the experiment. The experimental and calculation results show that turbulent burning velocity is predicted by using Karlovitz number in the engine conditions, which varies depending on engine speed, EGR rates and the designs of intake ports. The results indicate that Karlovitz number, which shows a local structure of flame and corresponds to the ratio of chemical time scale to turbulent time scale, can be extended to an indicator of the global combustion performance in an engine.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Yoshimura, K., Misawa, K., Tokuhara, S., Kobayashi, K. et al., "Relationship between Turbulent Burning Velocity and Karlovitz Number under EGR Conditions," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-2051, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-2051.Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 5 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 6 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 7 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 8 |
Also In
References
- Peters , N. Turbulent Combustion 2000 120
- Nakata , K. et al. 2016
- Yoshihara , Y. et al. Development of High Tumble Intake-Port for High Thermal Efficiency Engines SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0692 2016 https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0692
- Yamada , T. et al. 2015
- Tanahashi , M. Turbulent Premixed Combustion I -Reference Scales of Turbulence and Premixed Flame Journal of the Combustion Society of Japan 51 158 295 302 2009
- Saito , T. et al. Effect of Turbulence Intensities and Fuel Species in Turbulent Premixed Flames Journal of the Combustion Society of Japan 44 130 243 252 2002
- Brequigny , P. et al. Fuel Performance in Spark-Ignition Engines: Impact of Flame Stretch Combustion and flame 166 98 112 2016
- Mito , Y. et al. 2016
- https://www.avl.com/
- https://convergecfd.com/
- https://www.ansys.com/
- Mehl , M. et al. Kinetic Modeling of Gasoline Surrogate Components and Mixtures Under Engine Conditions Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 33 193 200 2011
- Sakai , Y. et al. Internal Combustion Engine Symposium 28 59 20178019 2017
- Sakai , Y. et al. Internal Combustion Engine Symposium 29 34 20183155 2018
- Poinsot , T. et al. Quenching Processes and Premixed Turbulent Combustion Diagrams J. Fluid Mech. 228 561 606 1991
- Heywood , J. 1988
- Libby , P.A. et al. Turbulent Reacting Flows Academic Press 1994 63 113
- Tanoue , K. et al. Study on the Dilution Effects of Carbon Dioxide on Turbulent Combustion Performance of Methane/Oxygen Mixtures Transactions of the JSME 67 661 2001
- Damköhler , G. Elektrochem. Angew. Phys. Chem. 46 601 652 1940
- Bradley , D. How Fast Can We Burn? Symposium (International) on Combustion 24 1 247 262 1992
- Shy , S.S. et al. Spark Ignition Probability and Minimum Ignition Energy Transition of the Lean Iso-Octane/Air Mizture in Premixed Turbulent Combustion Combustion and Flame 187 87 95 2018
- Shy , S.S. et al. Ignition Transition in Turbulent Premixed Combustion Combustion and Flame 157 341 350 2010
- Shy , S.S. et al. Effects of Electrode Spark Gap, Differential Diffusion on Two Distinct Phenomena: Turbulent Facilitated Ignition Versus Minimum Ignition Energy Transition Combustion and Flame 205 371 377 2019