This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Case Study of a Cu-SSZ-13 SCR Catalyst Poisoned by Real-World High Sulfur Diesel Fuel
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
Annotation ability available
To meet increasingly stringent diesel engine emission regulations, diesel engines are required to use ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD) and are equipped with advanced aftertreatment systems. Cu-SSZ-13 zeolite catalysts are widely used as selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts due to their high NOx reduction and excellent hydrothermal stability. However, active Cu sites of Cu-SSZ-13 catalysts can be poisoned by exposure to engine exhaust sulfur species. This poison effect can be mitigated with the use of ULSD and high temperature exposure from engine operation. On the other hand, ULSD is still not universally available where regulations require it, and vehicles may inadvertently operate with high sulfur diesel fuel (HSD) in some locations. The high concentration of exhaust sulfur species resulting from HSD combustion may rapidly poison the Cu-SSZ-13 SCR catalyst. In this study, the catalytic performance of a sulfur poisoned Cu-SSZ-13 SCR catalyst is analyzed. Results show that the as received SCR catalyst displays substantially low NOx conversion below 350 °C. A thermal treatment at 550 °C can recover most of its lost performance. Temperature programmed desorption (TPD), BET surface area and thermo-gravimetric analysis (TGA) were applied to analyze the poisoned SCR catalyst. The results indicate that both physical poisoning and chemical poisoning contribute to the reduced NOx conversion. In addition, reactivation experiments were conducted by progressively increasing the thermal treatment temperature to understand the effect of physical and chemical poisoning. Kinetic analysis was conducted to quantify catalyst deactivation and its recovery process.
CitationXi, Y., Ottinger, N., Keturakis, C., and Liu, Z., "A Case Study of a Cu-SSZ-13 SCR Catalyst Poisoned by Real-World High Sulfur Diesel Fuel," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1319, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1319.
- Paolucci, C., Di Iorio, J.R., Ribeiro, F.H., Gounder, R., and Schneider, W.F. , Advances in Catalysis 59:1-107, 2016.
- Khatri, N., Johnson, J., and Leddy, D. , “The Characterization of the Hydrocarbon and Sulfate Fractions of Diesel Particulate Matter,” SAE Technical Paper 780111, 1978, https://doi.org/10.4271/780111.
- Wall, J. and Hoekman, S. , “Fuel Composition Effects on Heavy-Duty Diesel Particulate Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 841364, 1984, https://doi.org/10.4271/841364.
- Xi, Y., Ottinger, N.A., and Liu, Z.G. , Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 160-161:1-9, 2014.
- Su, C., Brault, J., Munnannur, A., Liu, Z.G. et al. , SAE Int. J. Advances & Curr. Prac. in Mobility 1:201-214, 2019.
- Cheng, Y., Lambert, C., Kim, D.H., Kwak, J.H. et al. , Catal. Today 151:266-270, 2010.
- Jangjou, Y., Do, Q., Gu, Y., Lim, L.G. et al. , ACS Catal. 8:1325-1337, 2018.
- Xi, Y., Ottinger, N.A., and Liu, Z.G. , Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 217:581-590, 2017.
- Rouquerol, J., Llewellyn, P., and Rouquerol, F. , Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 160:49-56, 2007.
- Ottinger, N., Xi, Y., Keturakis, C., and Liu, Z. , “Low-Temperature NH3 Storage, Isothermal Desorption, Reactive Consumption, and Thermal Release from Cu-SSZ-13 and V2O5-WO3/TiO2 Selective Catalytic Reduction Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0735, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0735.
- Paolucci, C., Khurana, I., Parekh, A.A., Li, S. et al. , Science 257:898-903, 2017.
- Kwak, J.H., Tran, D., Burton, S.D., Szanyi, J. et al. , J. Catal. 287:203-209, 2012.
- Gao, F., Walter, E.D., Karp, E.M., Luo, J. et al. , J. Catal. 300:20-29, 2013.
- Matsuda, S., Kamo, T., Kato, A., and Nakajima, F. , Ind. Eng. Chem. Prod. Res. Dev. 21:48-52, 1982.