This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Process-Monitoring-for-Quality - A Step Forward in the Zero Defects Vision
Technical Paper
2020-01-1302
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
More than four decades ago, the concept of zero defects was coined by Phillip Crosby. It was only a vision at the time, but the introduction of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in manufacturing has since enabled it to become attainable. Since most mature manufacturing organizations have merged traditional quality philosophies and techniques, their processes generate only a few Defects Per Million of Opportunities (DPMO). Detecting these rare quality events is one of the modern intellectual challenges posed to this industry. Process Monitoring for Quality (PMQ) is an AI and big data-driven quality philosophy aimed at defect detection and empirical knowledge discovery. Detection is formulated as a binary classification problem, where the right Machine Learning (ML), optimization, and statistics techniques are applied to develop an effective predictive system. Manufacturing-derived data sets for binary classification of quality tend to be highly/ultra-unbalanced, making it very difficult for the learning algorithms to learn the minority (defective) class. The vision of how traditional quality philosophies (based on statistics) and PMQ can collaborate, interact, and complement each other to enable the development of zero-defect processes is presented. This vision is validated by a real case study in which 100% of the defects are detected.
Authors
Topic
Citation
Escobar, C., Arinez, J., and Morales-Menendez, R., "Process-Monitoring-for-Quality - A Step Forward in the Zero Defects Vision," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1302, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1302.Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 3 |
Also In
References
- Colvin , G. Sep 2015 fortune.com/2015/09/18/mary-barra-gm-culture 2018
- American Society of Quality
- Cohen , C.B. Apr 2018 2018
- Abell , J.A. , Chakraborty , D. , Escobar , C.A. , Im , K.H. et al. Big Data Driven Manufacturing-Process-Monitoring-for-Quality Philosophy ASME J of Manufacturing Science and Eng on Data Science-Enhanced Manufacturing 139 10 2017
- Escobar , C.A. , Jeffrey , A. , Abell , M.H.-d.-M. , and Morales-Menendez , R. Process- Monitoring-for-Quality-Big Models Procedia Manufacturing 26 1167 1179 2018
- Escobar , C.A. , Wincek , M.A. , Chakraborty , D. , and Morales-Menendez , R. Process-Monitoring-for-Quality-Applications Manufacturing Letters 16 14 17 2018
- Crosby , P.B. The Absolutes of Quality Management Industrial Management 1985
- Devore , J.L. Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences Cengage learning 2011
- Wang , K.-S. Towards Zero-Defect Manufacturing (ZDM)-A Data Mining Approach Advances in Manufacturing 1 1 62 74 2013
- Wuest , T. , Irgens , C. , and Thoben , K.D. An Approach to Monitoring Quality in Manufacturing Using Supervised Machine Learning on Product State Data J of Intelligent Manufacturing 25 5 1167 1180 2014
- Möller , G. and Erik 2017
- Li , Y. , Zhao , W. , and Pan , J. Deformable Patterned Fabric Defect Detection with Fisher Criterion-Based Deep Learning IEEE Trans on Automation Science and Engineering 14 2 1256 1264 2017
- Sun , T.-H. , Tien , F.-C. , Tien , F.-C. , and Kuo , R.-J. Automated Thermal Fuse Inspection Using Machine Vision and Artificial Neural Networks J of Intelligent Manufacturing 27 3 639 651 2016
- Pandey , R. S Naik, and R Marfatia Image Processing and Machine Learning for Automated Fruit Grading System: A Technical Review Int J of Computer Applications 2013
- Sa , I. , Ge , Z. , Dayoub , F. , Upcroft , B. et al. Deep Fruits: A Fruit Detection System Using Deep Neural Networks Sensors 16 8 1222 2016
- Ghorai , S. , Mukherjee , A. , Gangadaran , M. , and Dutta , P.K. Automatic Defect Detection on Hot-Rolled Flat Steel Products IEEE Trans on Instrumentation and Measurement 62 3 612 621 2013
- Du , S. , Liu , C. , and Xi , L. A Selective Multiclass Support Vector Machine Ensemble Classifier for Engineering Surface Classification using High Definition Metrology J of Manufacturing Science and Eng 137 1 011003 2015
- Elangovan , M. , Sakthivel , N.R. , Saravanamurugan , S. , Nair , B.B. , and Sugumaran , V. Machine Learning Approach to the Prediction of Surface Roughness using Statistical Features of Vibration Signal Acquired in Turning Procedia Computer Science 50 282 288 2015
- Baily , M.N. and Manyika , J. 2013
- Juran , J.M. Early SQC: A Historical Supplement Quality Progress 30 9 73 82 1997
- Montgomery , D.C. Introduction to Statistical Quality Control John Wiley & Sons 2012
- Montgomery , D.C. and Keats , J.B. Statistical Process Control in Manufacturing Marcel Dekker 1991
- Vazquez-Lopez , J.A. , and Lopez-Juarez , Ismael SPC Without Control Limits and Normality Assumption: A New Method Iberoamerican Congress on Pattern Recognition 2009 611 618
- Wasserman , L. All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference Springer Science & Business 2013
- Shmueli , G. To Explain or to Predict? Statistical Science 25 3 289 310 2010
- Ghosh , P. Jun 2016 www.dataversity.net/ai-vs-machine-learning-vs-deep-learning
- Montgomery , D.C. Exploring Observational Data Quality and Reliability Eng Int 33 8 1639 1640 2017
- Ribeiro , M.T. , Singh , S. , and Guestrin , C. Why Should I Trust You? Explaining the Predictions of Any Classier Proc of the 22nd Int Conf on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 2016 1135 1144
- Wuest , T. , Weimer , D. , Irgens , C. , and Thoben , K.D. Machine Learning in Manufacturing: Advantages, Challenges, and Applications Production & Manufacturing Research 4 1 23 45 2016
- Liu , H. and Motoda , H. Feature Extraction, Construction and Selection: A Data Mining Perspective 453 Springer Science & Business Media 1998
- Escobar , C.A. and Morales-Menendez , R. Process-Monitoring-for-Quality - A Machine Learning-Based Modeling for Rare Event Detection J of Elsevier Array
- Robnik-Šikonja , M. and Kononenko , I. Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of ReliefF and RReliefF Machine Learning 53 1-2 23 69 2003
- Escobar , C.A. and Morales-Menendez , R. Machine Learning Techniques for Quality Control in High Conformance Manufacturing Environment Advances in Mechanical Eng 10 2 1687814018755519 2018
- Escobar , C.A. and Morales-Menendez , R. Process- Monitoring-for-Quality - A Model Selection Criterion Manufacturing Letters 15 55 58 2018
- Dan , J. Quality 4.0 Fresh Thinking for Quality in the Digital Era Quality Digest July 2017
- Paton Scott , M. A Century of Quality: An Interview with Quality Legend Joseph M Juran Quality Digest Feb 1999
- AS of Quality 2011