This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Driver Perception of Lateral Collision Threats
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Immediate collision hazards pose obvious threats to approaching drivers and therefore provoke emergency evasive responses. When the hazard is a vehicle intruding into the lane ahead, how its movement characteristics influence an approaching driver’s response is not well understood.
This study examined the relationship between intruding vehicle motion and hazard perception. Seventeen subjects viewed first-person perspective recordings of a simulated vehicle travelling down a two-lane roadway containing several intersections with stop-controlled minor roads. Stopped vehicles were located at approximately half of the minor road intersections. Throughout the study, some vehicles (termed ‘intruders’) accelerated into the subject’s lane of travel at 1 of 6 pre-determined acceleration rates. Subjects were instructed to ‘brake’ their vehicle by pressing the space bar on a keyboard as soon as they perceived that a collision was imminent. Perception and response times (PRT) were measured as the elapsed time between the intruder’s first motion and braking. The duration of the perception interval was subsequently estimated by deducting a simple reaction time interval from the total PRT.
The results indicated a significant relationship between perception time and intruder vehicle motion. Subjects took longer to perceive slower accelerating intruders as immediate hazards, and therefore responded when intruders were closer to the subject’s path of travel, compared to intruders accelerating at higher rates. Differences in perception time across conditions of intruder acceleration suggest that the start of the intruder’s motion was not the sole source of information used in detecting an immediate hazard.
To the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to quantify the relationship between acceleration levels of laterally intruding vehicles and hazard perception processes. Such findings aid forensic assessments of driver behaviour during emergency situations and in designing autonomous vehicle systems that account for human limitations.
CitationErazo, F. and Campbell, A., "Driver Perception of Lateral Collision Threats," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1198, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1198.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- Krauss, D. , Forensic Aspects of Driver Perception and Response Fourth Edition (Tucson, AZ: Lawyers and Judges Publishing Company, Inc.).
- Mazzae, E., Barickman, F., and Forkenbrock, G. , “NHTSA Light Vehicle Antilock Brake System Research Program Task 5.2/5.3: Test Track Examination of Drivers’ Collision Avoidance Behavior Using Conventional and Antilock Brakes,” National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Report No. DOT HS 809 561.
- Summala, H. , “Brake Reaction Times and Driver Behavior Analysis,” Transportation Human Factors 2(3):217-226, 2000.
- Underwood, G., Ngai, A., and Underwood, J. , “Driving Experience and Situation Awareness in Hazard Detection,”56:29-35, 2013.
- Wang, X., Zhu, M., Chen, M., and Tremont, P. , “Drivers’ Rear and Collision Avoidance Behaviors under Different Levels of Situational Urgency,” Transportation Research Part C 71:419-433, 2016.
- Muttart, J., Messerschmidt, W., and Gillen, L. , “Relationship between Relative Velocity Detection and Driver Response Times in Vehicle Following Situations,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0427 , 2005, https://doi.org/10.4271/2005-01-0427.
- Quimby, A. and Watts, G. , “Human Factors and Driving Performance”, Transport and Road Research Laboratory Report No. 1004, 1981.
- Hughes, P. and Cole, B. , “What Attracts Attention When Driving?” Ergonomics 29(3):377-391, 1986.
- McKenna, F. and Crick, J. , “Hazard Perception in Drivers: A Methodology for Testing and Training”, Transport Research Laboratory Contractor Report no. 313, 1994.
- Borowsky, A., Shinar, D., and Oron-Gilad, T. , “Age, Skill and Hazard Perception in Driving,” Accident Analysis and Prevention 42:1240-1249, 2010.
- Borowsky, A., Oron-Gilad, T., Meir, A., and Parmet, Y. , “Driver’s Perception of Vulnerable Road Users: A Hazard Perception Approach,” Accident Analysis and Prevention 44:160-166, 2012.
- Olson, P. and Sivak, M. , “Perception-Response Time to Unexpected Roadway Hazard,” Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 28(1):91-96, 1986.
- Fugger, T., Wobrock, J., Randles, B., Stein, A. et al. , “Driver Characteristics at Signal-Controlled Intersections,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0045 , 2001, https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-0045.
- Goudie, D., Bowler, J., Brown, C., Heinrichs, B. et al. , “Tire Friction During Locked Wheel Braking,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1314 , 2000, https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-1314.
- SAE Standard J3016_201806 , “Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles.”
- Cunningham, M. and Regan, M.A. , “Autonomous Vehicles: Human Factors Issues and Future Research,” in Proceedings of the 2015 Australasian Road safety Conference, 14-16, 2015.