This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Co-Simulation Methods for Holistic Vehicle Design: A Comparison
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Vehicle development involves the design and integration of subsystems of different domains to meet performance, efficiency, and emissions targets set during the initial developmental stages. Before a physical prototype of a vehicle or vehicle powertrain is tested, engineers build and test virtual prototypes of the design(s) on multiple stages throughout the development cycle. In addition, controllers and physical prototypes of subsystems are tested under simulated signals before a physical prototype of the vehicle is available. Different departments within an automotive company tend to use different modelling and simulation tools specific to the needs of their specific engineering discipline. While this makes sense considering the development of the said system, subsystem, or component, modern holistic vehicle engineering requires the constituent parts to operate in synergy with one-another in order to ensure vehicle-level optimal performance. Due to the above, integrated simulation of the models developed in different environments is necessary. While a large volume of existing co-simulation related publications aimed towards engineering software developers, user-oriented publications on the characteristics of integration methods are very limited. This paper reviews the current trends in model integration methods applied within the automotive industry. The reviewed model integration methods are evaluated and compared with respect to an array of criteria such as required workflow, software requirements, numerical results, and simulation speed by means of setting up and carrying out simulations on a set of different model integration case studies. The results of this evaluation constitute a comparative analysis of the suitability of each integration method for different automotive design applications. This comparison is aimed towards the end-users of simulation tools, who in the process of setting up a holistic high-level vehicle model, may have to select the most suitable among an array of available model integration techniques, given the application and the set of selection criteria.
- Nikolaos Kalantzis - Loughborough University
- Tom Fletcher - Loughborough University
- Ahmed Ahmedov - Loughborough University
- Ruoyang Yuan - Loughborough University
- Antonios Pezouvanis - Loughborough University
- Kambiz Ebrahimi - Loughborough University
- Sina Shojaei - Jaguar Land Rover
- Richard Osborne - AVL UK Ltd.
CitationKalantzis, N., Fletcher, T., Ahmedov, A., Yuan, R. et al., "Co-Simulation Methods for Holistic Vehicle Design: A Comparison," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-1017, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-1017.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
- Le Marrec, P. et al. , “Hardware , Software and Mechanical Cosimulation for Automotive Applications,” in Ninth International Workshop on Rapid System Prototyping (Cat. No.98TB100237), 1998.
- Karvonen, A. and Thiringer, T. , “Co-Simulation and Harmonic Analysis of a Hybrid Vehicle Traction System,” in 2015 IEEE Veh. Power Propuls. Conf. VPPC 2015 - Proc., 2015.
- Chen, W., Klomp, M., and Ran, S. , “Real-time Co-simulation Method Study for Vehicle Steering and Chassis System,” IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(9):273-278, 2018.
- Mikelsons, L. and Samlaus, R. , “Towards Virtual Validation of ECU Software using FMI,” in Proceedings of the 12th International Modelica Conference May 15-17, 2017, 2017, 307-311.
- Klein, S. et al. , “Engine in the Loop: Closed Loop Test Bench Control with Real-Time Simulation,” SAE Int. J. Commer. Veh. 10(1):95-105, 2017, doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0219.
- Khan, I.M., Datar, M., Sun, W., Festag, G. et al. , “Multibody Dynamics Cosimulation for Vehicle NVH Response Predictions,” SAE Int. J. Veh. Dyn. Stability, NVH 1(2):131-136, 2017, doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1054.
- Pedersen, N. et al. , “Co-simulation of distributed engine control system and network model using FMI & SCNSL,” IFAC-PapersOnLine 48(16):261-266, 2015.
- Wu, T., Han, K., Pei, L., and Zhao, C. , “Co-Simulation Study of Coordinated Engine Control Focusing on Tracked Vehicle Shift Quality,” J. Autom. Control Eng. 2(2):160-165, 2014.
- Fitzgerald, J. et al. , “Collaborative Modelling and Co-simulation in the Development of Dependable Embedded Systems,” in Integrated Formal Methods - IFM, 2010, 12-26.
- Aslan, M., Oǧuztüzün, H., Durak, U., and Taylan, K. , “MOKA : An Object-Oriented Framework for FMI,” in 47th Summer Comput. Simul. Conf. 2015, SummerSim ’15, 2015, 1-8.
- Reyneri, F.R.L.M., Bellei, E., Bussolino, E., and Mari, L. , “Codesign and Cosimulation of Automotive Systems Based on Matlab/Simulink,” in Seminario Anual de Automática, Electrónica Industrial e Instrumentación, SAAEI, 2002.
- Kyllingstad, L.T., Rindarøy, M., and Eirik, D. , “Distributed Co-Simulation of Maritime Systems and Operations,” in CoRR, 1701.00997, 2017.
- Casoli, P., Gambarotta, A., Pompini, N., and Riccò, L. , “Development and Application of Co-Simulation and ‘control-oriented ’ Modeling in the Improvement of Performance and Energy Saving of Mobile Machinery,” Energy Procedia 45:849-858, 2014.
- Zhang, B. et al. , “Component Tests Based on Vehicle Modeling and Virtual Testing,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0384, 2017, doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-0384.
- Li, G., Wang, T., Zhang, R., Gu, F., and Shen, J. , “An Improved Optimal Slip Ratio Prediction considering Tyre Inflation Pressure Changes,” J. Control Sci. Eng., 2015.
- Xie, F., Wang, J., and Wanga, Y. , “Modelling and Co-simulation Based on AMESim and Simulink for Light Passenger Car with Dual State CVT,” Procedia Engineering (2011) 16 363-368 16:363-368, 2011.
- Maharun, M., Bin Baharom, M., and Mohd, M.S. , “Modelling and Control of 4WD Parallel Split Hybrid Electric Vehicle Converted from a Conventional Vehicle,” World J. Model. Simul. 9(1):47-58, 2013.
- Li, S., Zhao, L., and Yang, C. , “Co-Simulation Study for Fuzzy ESP Control Strategy on Vehicle,” Open Mech. Eng. J.682-688, 2014.
- Özener, O. and Allouchery, L. , “Istanbul Metrobus Line Fuel Consumption Optimization via 3D Road Model By Using AVL Cruise & IPG Truck Maker Co-Simulation,” Int. J. Adv. Automot. Technol. 1(2):100-104, 2017.
- Eckert, J.J., Santiciolli, F.M., Costa, S., Corrêa, F.C., Dionísio, H.J., and Dedini, F.G. , “Vehicle Gear Shifting Co-Simulation to Optimize Performance and Fuel Consumption in the Brazilian Standard Urban Driving Cycle,” in XXII Simpósio Internacional de Engenharia Automotiva, 2014, 1.
- Fletcher, T., Kalantzis, N., Cary, M., Lygoe, B., Pezouvanis, A., and Ebrahimi, K. , “Automated Model Based Engine Calibration Procedure using Co-Simulation,” in 4th Biennial International Conference on Powertrain Modelling and Control (PMC 2018), 2018, 118.
- Zhang, C. and Sun, Z. , “Using Variable Piston Trajectory to Reduce Engine-Out Emissions,” Appl. Energy 170:403-414, 2016.
- Hallqvist, R., Braun, R., and Krus, P. , “Early Insights on FMI-based Co-Simulation of Aircraft Vehicle Systems,” in Proc. 15th Scand. Int. Conf. Fluid Power, 15th Scand. Int. Conf. Fluid Power, Fluid Power Digit. Age, SICFP’17, June 7-9, 2017, in Linköping, Sweden, 2017, 144, 262-270.
- Bertsch, C., Ahle, E., and Schulmeister, U. , “The Functional Mockup Interface - Seen from an Industrial Perspective,” in Proc. 10th Int. Model. Conf. March 10-12, 2014, Lund, Sweden, 2014, 96, 27-33.
- J. Z. (Volvo) Pamela Innerwinkler (VIF), Georg Stettinger (VIF), Ralph Weissnegger (CISC), Cihangir Derse (TF), Eren Aydemir (FO), “Modular Co-Simulation Architecture Plan,” 2018.
- Osborne, R.P. and Weaver, N. , “Optimum Engine Models for Diesel Automotive Powertrain Development Processes,” in IPDS 2006: Integrated Powertrain and Driveline Systems 2006, 2006, 67-76.