This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Patient Demographics and Injury Characteristics of ER Visits Related to Powered-Scooters
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
With growing environmental concerns associated with gas-powered vehicles and busier city streets, micro-mobility modes, including traditional bicycles and new technologies, such as electric scooters (e-scooters), are becoming solutions. In 2018, e-scooter usage overtook other shared micro-mobility modes with over 38 million e-scooter trips taken. Concurrently, the societal concern regarding the safety of these devices is also increasing. To examine the types of injuries associated with e-scooters and bicycles, the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS), a probability sample of US hospitals that collects information from emergency room (ER) visits related to consumer products, was utilized. Records from September 2017 to December 2018 were extracted, and those associated with powered scooters were identified. Injury distributions by age, sex, race, treatment, diagnosis, and location on the body were explored. The number of person-trips was obtained to perform a risk analysis. An estimated 17,772 injuries were associated with powered scooters. Nearly 45% of injuries occurred in persons aged 10-29 years. Almost 87% of ER visits consisted of patients being treated and released, whereas nearly 11% were hospitalized (the remaining 2% either received no treatment or the disposition was unknown). Common injuries included contusions/abrasions, fractures, and lacerations. Almost 15% of the injuries associated with powered scooters occurred to the face; the head, ankle, lower leg, and knee were other common body parts injured. An estimated 51 million person-trips were taken during this time period, resulting in an injury rate of 346 injuries/million trips. In comparison, 4.7 billion person-trips were taken on bicycles, resulting in an injury rate of 114 injuries/million trips.
CitationWatson, H., Garman, C., Wishart, J., and Zimmermann, J., "Patient Demographics and Injury Characteristics of ER Visits Related to Powered-Scooters," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0933, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0933.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
- National Association of City Transportation Officials , “Shared Micromobility in the U.S.: 2018,” 2018, https://nacto.org/shared-micromobility-2018/.
- Forester, J. , “Flow of Cycle Traffic,” Bicycle Transportation: A Handbook for Cycling Transportation Engineers, Second Edition (Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 1994), 109-112, ISBN:9780262560795.
- Langford, B.C., Chen, J., and Cherry, C. , “Risky Riding: Naturalistic Methods for Comparing Safety Behavior from Conventional Bicycle Riders and Electric Bike Riders,” Accident Analysis & Prevention 82:220-226, 2015, doi:10.1016/j.aap.2015.05.016.
- Mathew, J., Liu, M., Li, H., Seeder, S. et al. , “Analysis of E-Scooter Trips and Their Temporal Usage Patterns,” ITE Journal 89:44-49, 2019.
- Portland Bureau of Transportation , “E-Scooter Findings Report,” 2018, https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/70971.
- Bullard, N. , “Scooters and Bikes Compete for City Streets,” Bloomberg, May 2, 2018, https://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2018-05-04/electric-scooters-bikes-compete-forcity-streets.
- National Association of City Transportation Officials , “Bike Share in the U.S.: 2017,” 2017, https://nacto.org/bike-share-statistics-2017/.
- Hole, J.G., Tyrrell, L., and Langham, M. , “Some Factors Affecting Motorcyclists’ Conspicuity,” Ergonomics 39(7):946-965, 1996, doi:10.1080/00140139608964516.
- Pammer, K., Sabadas, S., and Lentern, S. , “Allocating Attention to Detect Motorcycles: The Role of Inattentional Blindness,” Hum. Fact. 60(1):5-19, 2018, doi:10.1177/0018720817733901.
- Spivey, H. and Srinivas, P.S. , “Visibility of Two-Wheelers Approaching Left-Turning Vehicles Compared with Other Hazards under Nighttime Conditions at Urban Signalized Intersections,” Trans. Res. Rec. 2587:133-140, 2016, doi:10.3141/2587-16.
- Hurt, H.H., Ouellet, J.V., and Thom, D.R. , “Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors and Identification of Countermeasures, Volume 1: Technical Report,” USDOT, NHTSA, Washington, DC, 1981.
- Austin Public Health , “Dockless Electric Scooter-Related Injuries Study,” 2018, https://www.austintexas.gov/sites/default/files/files/Health/Epidemiology/APH_Dockless_Electric_Scooter_Study_5-2-19.pdf.
- Trivedi, T.K., Liu, C., Antonio, A.L., Wheaton, N. et al. , “Injuries Associated with Standing Electric Scooter Use,” JAMA Network Open 2(1):e187381-e187381, 2019, doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7381.
- Badeau, A., Carman, C., Newman, M., Steenblik, J. et al. , “Emergency Department Visits for Electric Scooter-Related Injuries after Introduction of an Urban Rental Program,” The American Journal of Emergency Medicine 37(8):1531-1533, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2019.05.003.
- Federal Highway Administration , “National Household Travel Survey,” https://nhts.ornl.gov/, accessed July, 2019.
- Consumer Product Safety Commission , “National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS),” CPSC.gov. https://www.cpsc.gov/Research--Statistics/NEISS-Injury-Data.
- Todd, J., Krauss, D., Zimmermann, J., and Dunning, A. , “Behavior of Electric Scooter Operators in Naturalistic Environments,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1007, 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-1007.
- Capua, T., Glatstein, M., Hermon, K., Tavor, O. et al. , “A Comparison of Manual versus Electric Bicycle Injuries Presenting to a Pediatric Emergency Department,” Rambam Maimonides Medical Journal 10(3), 2019.
- Trivedi, T.K., Liu, C., Antonio, A.L.M., Wheaton, N. et al. , “Injuries Associated with Standing Electric Scooter Use,” JAMA Network Open 2(1):e187381-e187381, 2019.
- DeJoy, D.M. , “An Examination of Gender Differences in Traffic Accident Risk Perception,” Accident Analysis & Prevention 24(3):237-246, 1992.
- Waldron, I., Christopher, M., and Earle, I. , “Trends in Gender Differences in Accidents Mortality: Relationships to Changing Gender Roles and Other Societal Trends,” Demographic Research 13:415-454, 2005.
- Konecni, V., Ebbeson, E.B., and Konecni, D.K. , “Decision Processes and Risk Taking in Traffic: Driver Response to the Onset of Yellow Light,” Journal of Applied Psychology 61(3):359, 1976.
- Cobey, K.D., Laan, F., Stulp, G., Buunk, A. et al. , “Sex Differences in Risk Taking Behavior among Dutch Cyclists,” Evolutionary Psychology 11(2):350-364, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100206.
- Duke, L., Stricklin, O., Russom, C., Trinkaus, J. et al. , “Micro-Mobility Commuting Patterns,” 2019.
- Pucher, J. and Buehler, R. , “Making Cycling Irresistible: Lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany,” Transport Reviews 28(4):495-528.25, 2008.
- Stevenson, M., Hamer, P., Finch, C.F., Elliot, B. et al. , “Sport, Age, and Sex Specific Incidence of Sports Injuries in Western Australia,” British Journal of Sports Medicine 34(3):188-194, 2000, doi:10.1136/bjsm.34.3.188.
- Rodgers, G.B. , “Bicycle and Bicycle Helmet Use Patterns in the United States: A Description and Analysis of National Survey Data,” US Consumer Product Safety Commission, Washington, DC, 1993, Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute, revised January 7, 2020, https://helmets.org/stats.htm.