This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Brake Power Availability Led Optimisation of P0 versus P2 48V Hybrid Powertrain Architectures
Technical Paper
2020-01-0439
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Through improving the 48V hybrid vehicle archetype, governmental emission targets could be more easily met without incurring the high costs associated with increasing levels of electrification. The braking energy recovery function of hybrid vehicles is recognised as an effective solution to reduce emissions and fuel consumption in the short to medium term. The aim of this study was to evaluate methods to maximise the braking energy recovery capability of the 48V hybrid electric vehicle over pre-selected drive cycles using appropriately sized electrified components. The strategy adopted was based upon optimising the battery chemistry type via specific power capability, so that overall brake power is equal to the maximum battery charging power in a typical medium-sized passenger car under typical driving. This will maximise the regenerative braking energy whilst providing a larger torque assistance for a lower battery capacity. Dynamic simulation models were developed using GT-DRIVE software, emulating a mid-sized car with a 48V battery, and different turbocharged gasoline engines with motor-generator unit positions along a drivetrain. The 1.3 kWh battery pack was developed using a 14 Ah Lithium Iron Phosphate cell arranged in a 14 series 2 parallel configuration. A fuel economy comparison was produced using the FTP, WLTP, and HEFET drive cycles. When the motor-generator unit was attached via a synchronous belt, a 10-17% fuel saving was achieved in the WLTP drive cycle. Comparatively, when placing the electric machine after the clutch in a “P2” position, a 17-21% fuel saving was attained. The energy loss analysis of both P2 and P0 configurations revealed up to 7% overall reduction in total energy losses for the P2 setup. This was despite an increase in the motor-generator unit and battery losses due to the extended use of both in the electric-only mode capability with the P2 layout.
Recommended Content
Authors
Topic
Citation
Alnamasi, K., Terry, S., La Rocca, A., and Cairns, A., "Brake Power Availability Led Optimisation of P0 versus P2 48V Hybrid Powertrain Architectures," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0439, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0439.Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 5 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 6 | ||
| Unnamed Dataset 7 |
Also In
References
- Hook , M. and Tang , X. Depletion of Fossil Fuels and Anthropogenic Climate Change-A review Energy Policy 52 797 809 2013
- BP https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/business-sites/en/global/corporate/ pdfs/energy-economics/energy-outlook/bp-energy-outlook-2018.pdf 2019
- Doerr , M. , and Sapsford , S. 2017
- Jorhnson Matthey Battery Systems http://www.jmbatterysystems.com/JMBS/media/JMBS/Documents/JMBS-28025-Battery-Guide-Reprint-July-2017.pdf 2019
- Greenwood , D. Automotive Batteries 101 Panel Presentation at The Advanced Propulsion Center UK 2018
- Green Car Congress https://www.greencarcongress.com/2016/09/20160913-adept.html 2019
- MAHLE Powertrain https://www.mahle-powertrain.com/media/mahle-powertrain/experience/48v-battery-pack/48v-battery_screen-all-sites.pdf 2019
- Auto Snout https://www.autosnout.com/Cars-0-60mph-List.php 2019
- Dinger , A. et al. 2010
- Arbizzani , C. , De Giorgio , F. , and Mastragostino , M. 4 - Battery Parameters for Hybrid Electric Vehicles Advances in Battery Technologies for Electric Vehicles 2015 55 72 10.1016/B978-1-78242-377-5.00004-2
- National Research Council Cost, Effectiveness, and Deployment of Fuel Economy Technologies for Light-Duty Vehicles Washington, DC The National Academies Press 2015 4 21 10.17226/21744
- Safoutin , M. , Cherry , J. , McDonald , J. , and Lee , S. Effect of Current and SOC on Round-Trip Energy Efficiency of a Lithium-Iron Phosphate (LiFePO4) Battery Pack SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1186 2015 https://doi.org/10.4271/2015-01-1186
- Ford https://www.ford.com/powertrains/ecoboost 2019
- Bao , R. , Avila , V. , and Baxter , J. Effect of 48 V Mild Hybrid System Layout on Powertrain System Efficiency and Its Potential of Fuel Economy Improvement SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-1175 2017 https://doi.org/10.4271/2017-01-1175
- Burress , T. Benchmarking of Competitive Technologies 2012
- 2019
- Lee , S. , Cherry , J. , Safoutin , M. , McDonald , J. et al. Modeling and Validation of 48V Mild Hybrid Lithium-Ion Battery Pack SAE Int. J. Alt. Power. 7 3 273 287 2018 https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0433
- Dagci , O. , Pereira , N. , and Cherry , J. Maneuver-Based Battery-in-the-Loop Testing - Bringing Reality to Lab SAE Int. J. Alt. Power. 2 1 7 17 2013 https://doi.org/10.4271/2013-01-0157