This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Connecting Rod Durability and Big-End Bore Distortion Study
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
To be published on April 14, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The prediction of the connecting rod behaviour is one of the most important aspects of the engine design to estimate the engine life and its NVH behaviour. Connecting rod is usually simulated as a stand-alone component replacing the connected members with boundary conditions. These kinds of simulation usually underestimate the life of the connecting rod and overestimate the crankpin distortion. This unreal behaviour of simulation can result in over design of the crankshaft and wrong crankpin bearing selection, which can result in a noisy engine. The current Finite Element Analysis (FEA) is modelled by considering crankshaft, bearings, 3D bolts and crankcase substructure along with the connecting rod to predict the fatigue life and bearing distortion. A multi-body dynamics (MBD) simulation of the Cranktrain has been carried out to predict the forces and accelerations on the connecting rod by including the combustion force with a constant crankshaft speed for different conditions. The extracted loads from MBD simulation at different conditions are imported into FEA model, to predict stresses at maximum combustion and maximum inertia stages. Journal bearing crushing and bolt preload are the initial steps to the simulation. The predicted stresses from FEA has been considered as input for the fatigue life prediction following the engine endurance cycle including the residual stresses. The big end distortion has been Fourier transformed to extract the bounds which give insight into clearance limit in the operating conditions. Fatigue life prediction and the big end distortion from the regular stand-alone connecting rod model and FEA assembly method has been compared and discussed. The wear pattern on the big end bearing in testing emulated the contact pressure pattern on the assembly method, which emphasises the importance of modelling the connecting rod durability as an assembly model.
CitationThekke Kolayath, N., T, S., and Giles, R., "Connecting Rod Durability and Big-End Bore Distortion Study," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0184, 2020.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Kandreegula, S., Paroche, S., Mukherjee, S., Ayyar, D. et al. , “Fatigue Analysis and Validation of Fracture Split Connecting Rod for Value Engineering Using 1D and 3D Simulation Tools,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1735 , 2016, doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-1735.
- Alam, M.T., Thakur, A., Kumar, P.S.V., and Ghadei, S. , “Fatigue Failure Analysis of Diesel Engine Connecting Rod,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-28-0067 , 2018, doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-28-0067.
- MIL-HDBK-60 , “Military Handbook, Threaded Fasteners - Tightening to Proper Tension,” March 12, 1990.
- Simulia/fe-safe 2019 documentation, fe-safe User Guide, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA.
- DIN 4764 , “Surfaces Used in Mechanical Engineering and Fine Mechanics - Terms and Definitions with Respect to Their Stress Purposes,” German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut für Normung), 1982.
- FKM (Forschungskuratorium Maschinenbau) , “Analytical Strength Assessment of Components,” VDMA Verlag, 6th revised edition, 2012.
- Bardzimashvili, T., Kelly, J.F., and Romelashvili, E. , “Distortion Inside a Piston Bore,” 2004.