This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
A Study on the Development of Aerostructures Design for Assembly Guidelines and Their Effective Use to Proactively Identify Opportunities for Improvement in Mitigating Common Defects of the Aerostructures Assembly
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 10, 2020 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
An Aircraft’s assembly process plays a vital part in its design, development and production phases and contributes to about half of the Total cost spent in its entire product lifecycle. Design For Assembly (DFA®) principles have been one of the proven effective methodologies in Automotive and Process industries. Use of DFA® principles have resulted in proactively simplifying and optimizing engineering designs with reduced product costs, and improved efficiencies in product design and performance. Standardization of Assembly guidelines is vital for “Design and Build” and “Build-To-Print” manufacturing supplier organizations. However, Standardizing design methodologies, through use of proven tools like Advanced Product Quality Planning, (APQP) are still in the initial stages in Aerospace part and process design processes. Thus, there is a tremendous opportunity for research on the application of the existing DFA® guidelines to optimize Engineering Aerospace Assembly processes aiming to simplify, standardize design methodologies by building on existing industry practices which have a common platform for design communication and are easy to adopt within the existing process/systems. This technical paper is to discuss the framework for application of DFA® principles and design guidelines specifically aimed for engineering optimization of Aerospace Assembly Process Designs. The Aerospace DFA® implementation framework proposed in this paper is based on the study on the application of the existing DFA® guidelines proven and used in other Process industries to Aerospace Part and Process Design and development. This paper collates the findings, experiences and learnings gained during the study collated from a research point of view using Six Sigma methodology DMAIC and DMADV. This paper also focuses on the use and publication of this research outputs on Aerospace industry applicable DFA® guidelines, which can be used as a reference for emerging Aerospace designers in their future and current designs.
CitationRajamani, M. and Punna, E., "A Study on the Development of Aerostructures Design for Assembly Guidelines and Their Effective Use to Proactively Identify Opportunities for Improvement in Mitigating Common Defects of the Aerostructures Assembly," SAE Technical Paper 2020-01-0009, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4271/2020-01-0009.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
- Campbell, F.C. , Manufacturing Technology for Aerospace Structural Materials (2006).
- Anderson, D.M. , Design for Manufacturability & Concurrent Engineering: How to Design for Low Cost, Design in High Quality, Design for Lean Manufacture, and Design Quickly for Fast Production (Cambria, CA: CIM Press, 2004).
- Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., and Knight, W.A. , Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2013).
- Federal Aviation Administration Academy (U.S.) , “Aviation Maintenance Technician Handbook: Airframe,” FAA-H-8083-31A, 2018, http://public.eblib.com/choice/publicfullrecord.aspx?p=5521191.
- Reithmaier, L.W. , Standard Aircraft Handbook for Mechanics and Technicians (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1999). http://books.google.com/books?id=kX9TAAAAMAAJ.
- Saha, P.K. , Aerospace Manufacturing Processes (CRC Press, 2016), doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315367965.
- Rajamani, M.R. and Punna, E. , “A Study on the Development of an Effective Framework for Implementation and Sustenance of an Obsolescence Material Management System in an Aerospace Supplier Manufacturing Industry Environment,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-28-0145 , 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-28-0145.
- Rajamani, M.R. , “An Effective and Efficient Audit Method for Shelf-Life Material Management System,” IN Patent, 17/2019, Apr. 26, 2019.
- Rajamani, M.R. , “A Study on Mitigating Head Gap Defects due to Radius of Externally Threaded Fasteners in Aerostructures Assembly,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-6004 , 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-6004.
- Rajamani, M.R. and Punna, E. , “A Framework for Effective Implementation of Process Failure Modes and Effects Analysis with Control Plans to Mitigate Process, Discrete Manufacturing and Service Industries, Using Aerospace Standard Best Practices,” SAE Technical Paper 2019-28-0149 , 2019, doi:https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-28-0149.
- Rajamani, M.R. and Punna, E. , “Applying the Concept of Selective Fit Assembly for Effective Variation Management in Aerospace Engine Component Assemblies,” SAE Int. J. Aerosp., JAERO-2019-0028, 2020.
- Rajamani, M.R. and Punna, E. , “A Study on the Application of Engineering Tolerance Analysis, Variation Sensitivity Analysis Management and Their Effect on Establishing, Improving Aerospace Parts and Systems Reliability Management,” presented at in 34th Indian Engineering Congress 2019, organized by The Institution of Engineers (India), Hyderabad, India, Dec. 27-29, 2019, Technical Volume ISBN:978-81-942561-5-1.