This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Simulation Analysis of the Scavenging Process of a Uniflow and Loop Scavenging Concept
Published January 24, 2020 by Society of Automotive Engineers of Japan in Japan
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The two-stroke engine, as a today unconventional concept in automotive applications, has a great potential for a relaunch in the fast-growing market of Plugin Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) or Range Extender Electric Vehicle (REX) [2, 3, 4, 8, 9]. An efficient scavenging to remove the in-cylinder burnt gases and to fill the cylinder with fresh charge, performed at the same time is one of the major challenges, as losses of fresh air and fuel towards the exhaust line should be avoided when operating a lambda = 1 concept necessary for a 3-way catalyst aftertreatment system.
A prior study  of different gas exchange designs for two-stroke engines concludes that two possible concepts cover this purpose. In this paper, 3D-CFD simulation is used to compare these two different scavenging concepts, a uniflow and a loop scavenging type with control elements for the gas exchange process. As boundary conditions, it is assumed that both concept types have nearly the same displacement, are used with an external scavenging blower and have a lubrication system like a conventional oil sump similar to a four-stroke engine. Additionally, a high-pressure direct injection fuel system is applied to guarantee oil- and fuel-free air for the scavenging process.
To compare these different two-stroke scavenging concepts, this study focuses on the scavenging and compression phase using 3D-CFD simulation in order to evaluate the scavenging characteristics and the in-cylinder charge motion. The goal of this study is to prepare a basis for discussion of the best configuration, which will be designed, built and tested on the engine test-bench.
CitationSturm, S., Lang, M., and Schmidt, S., "Simulation Analysis of the Scavenging Process of a Uniflow and Loop Scavenging Concept," SAE Technical Paper 2019-32-0549, 2020.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
- Sturm, S., Schmidt, S., and Kirchberger, R. ; "Overview of Different Gas Exchange Concepts for Two-Stroke Engines"; SAE Technical Paper 2018-32-0041; 2018
- Mattarelli E., Rinaldini C.A., Cantore G. ; “Comparison between a Diesel and a New 2-Stroke GDI Engine on a Series Hybrid Passenger Car”; SAE Technical Paper 2013-24-0085; 2013
- Mattarelli E., Rinaldini C.A., Baldini P. ; “Modeling and Experimental Invastigation of a 2-Stroke GDI Engine for Range Extender Application”; SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1672; 2014
- Borghi M., Mattarelli E., Muscolini J., et al.; “Design and experimental development of a compact and efficient range extender engine” ; Science Direct Paper 202 (2017) 507-526; 2017
- Hori, H. , "Scavenging Flow Optimization of Two-Stroke Diesel Engine by Use of CFD," SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-0903, 2000
- Laget, O., Ternel, C., Thiriot, J., Charmasson, S. et al., "Preliminary Design of a Two-Stroke Uniflow Diesel Engine for Passenger Car," SAE Int. J. Engines 6(1):596-613, 2013
- Ma, J. and Zhao, H. , "The Modeling and Design of a Boosted Uniflow Scavenged Direct Injection Gasoline (BUSDIG) Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1970, 2015
- Abis, A., Schwab, C., Kirchberger, R., and Eichlseder, H. , "An Innovative Two-Stroke Twin-Cylinder Engine Layout for Range Extending Application," SAE Technical Paper 2013-32-9133, 2013
- Duret P., Venturie S., Sciarretta A., Foxhall N., Hinterberger W. ; “Potential of a Production DI Two Two-Stroke Engine Adapted for Range Extender and Motorcycle Applications”; SAE Technical Paper 2017-32-0082; 2017