This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Framework Standard for Prognosis: An Approach for Effective Prognosis Implementation
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published January 09, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Prognosis is used to improve system availability. This is achieved by minimizing system downtime with the help of mechanisms that senses the degradation in the system health to predict the ‘time-to-failure’ of the system. Degradation in the system’s health is measured by sensing the early signs of aging and wear and tear of the system components. This requires knowledge of all the failure modes of the system along with patterns of behavioral changes in the individual components of the system while it continues to age.
Prognosis methods and mechanisms are still evolving. So, no comprehensive guidelines or framework standards exist as of today that can provide reliable and standardized prognosis solutions to the end user customers. The intent of devising such a framework and guidelines is to improve and standardize the implementation of prognosis solutions so that; it will be more effective to all stakeholders from the perspective of safety, cost and convenience.
At present, there is a lot of variation in the implementation of a prognostic mechanism, although having well developed methods for the same. This is due to the lack of availability of a common framework that guides the design of the prognostic mechanism for a product. The framework standard proposed in this paper can facilitate the development of the prognosis methods that are more stable, accurate and reliable, in terms of providing information about the health of the system at the right time making it more useful from the perspective of maintenance. The framework standard provides guidance throughout system life cycle, i.e. right from the development till maintenance phase.
|Magazine Issue||AEROSPACE ENGINEERING 2013-03|
|Technical Paper||Design and Implementation of Aircraft System Health Management (ASHM) Utilizing Existing Data Feeds|
|Technical Paper||Embedded Diagnostics and Prognostics for Future Vehicles|
CitationPawar, S., "Framework Standard for Prognosis: An Approach for Effective Prognosis Implementation," SAE Technical Paper 2019-26-0364, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-26-0364.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 9]|
- Rizzoni, G., Simona, O., and Rubagotti, M., “Diagnosis and Prognosis of Automotive Systems: Motivations, History and Some Results.” http://myweb.clemson.edu/~sonori/Publications/semiplenary_090401rev.pdf.
- ISO 26262: Road vehicles -- Functional safety, International Standard ISO/FDIS 26262-2: 2011. Copyright remains with ISO.
- Sankavaram, C., Pattipati, B., Kodali, A., Pattipati, K., Azam, M., Kumar, S., and Pecht, M., “Model-Based and Data-Driven Prognosis of Automotive and Electronic Systems.” http://www.prognostics.umd.edu/calcepapers/09_Sankavaram_Model_Based_Data_Driven.pdf.
- Dardar, R., “Building a Safety Case in Compliance with ISO 26262 for Fuel Level Estimation and Display System,” Master Thesis in Intelligent Embedded Systems, School of Innovation, Design and Engineering, Malardalen University, Vasteras, Sweden.
- Denton, T., Advanced Automotive Fault Diagnosis Second Edition ().
- Smith, E.W. and Pascoe, K.J., “Fatigue Crack Initiation and Growth in a High-Strength Ductile Steel Subject to In-Plane Biaxial Loading,” Multiaxial Fatigue, ASTM STP 853, Miller, K. J. and Brown, M. W., Eds., Multiaxial Fatigue, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, 1985, 111-134.
- Wilcock, D.F. and Richard Booser, E., “Rolling-Bearing Trouble Shooting, Bearing Design and Application,” First Edition, Chapter 6.
- Chapter 1: Basic Aspects of Fatigue, Chapter: 9 The Effect of Weld Defects, Fatigue of Welded Structures, T. R. Gurney, M.A., C.Eng., A.M.I.C.E.
- Wang, X.-S., Zhang, M., Song, X.-P., Jia, S. et al., “Fatigue Failure Analyses on a Ti-45Al-8Nb-0.2W-0.2B-0.1Y Alloy at Different Temperatures,” Materials 5(11):2280-2291, 2012, doi:10.3390/ma5112280 http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/5/11/2280/htm.
- De Felice, F., Petrillo, A., and Autorino, C., “Maintenance Strategies and Innovative Approaches in the Pharmaceutical Industry: An Integrated Management System (IMS), Regular Paper, http://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs-wm/47804.pdf.
- Fredriksson, G. and Larsson, H., “An Analysis of Maintenance Strategies and Development of a Model for Strategy Formulation - A Case Study,” Master of Science Thesis in the Master Degree Programme, Production Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden, 2012.
- Gabelli, A. and Morales-Espejel, G.E., Evolution - the Business and Technology Magazine from SKF, www.skf.com, December 18, 2015. http://evolution.skf.com/the-progression-of-surface-rolling-contact-fatigue-damage-of-rolling-bearings/.
- Bennett, H.E., “Laser Induced Damage in Optical Materials,” Proceedings of a Symposium, American Society for Testing and Materials, United States, November 16-18, 1982. National Bureau of Standards, 415, 416, 417.
- Section: Test method: CCA was estimated with the Spectro CA-12 and the capacity was measured with an Agilent load bank by applying full discharges according to BCI standards, paragraph 2. http://batteryuniversity.com/learn/article/how_age_affects_capacity_and_resistance.
- Bathtub Curve, http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/apr/section1/apr124.htm.
- Summers, A. and Gentile, M., “Random, Systematic and Common Cause Failure: How Do You Manage Them?” http://sis-tech.com/wp-content/uploads/2005/10/Random_Systematic_and_Common_Cause_Failure.pdf
- Bathtub Curve, Lecture 2. http://www.nptel.ac.in/courses/112107142/27.
- Zuberuddin, M., “Study on The Effects of Band Overload on Fatigue Crack Growth Retardation,” May 2009, NIT Rourkela. http://ethesis.nitrkl.ac.in/1519/1/MTECH_thesis_zuber.pdf
- Wilkins, D.J., The Bathtub Curve and Product Failure Behavior Part One - The Bathtub Curve, Infant Mortality and Burn-In, section: Infant Mortality What Causes It and What to Do About It? http://www.weibull.com/hotwire/issue21/hottopics21.htm.
- Saxena, A., Goebel, K., Simon, D.; Eklund, N., “Damage Propagation Modeling for Aircraft Engine Run-to-Failure Simulation,” in International Conference on Prognostics and Health Management, PHM 2008, 2008. doi:10.1109/PHM.2008.4711414. IEEE Xplore.
- Marshall, J., An Introduction to Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), Product Excellence Using 6 Sigma Module. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/wmg/ftmsc/modules/modulelist/peuss/slides/section_11b_fta_lecture_slides_compatibility_mode.pdf.
- Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA). http://asq.org/learn-about-quality/process-analysis-tools/overview/fmea.html.