This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Study of Fuel Octane Sensitivity Effects on Gasoline Partially Premixed Combustion Using Optical Diagnostics
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published September 09, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Partially premixed combustion (PPC) is a low-temperature combustion concept that could deliver higher engine efficiency, as well as lower emissions. Gasoline-like fuel compression ignition (GCI) is beneficial for air/fuel mixing process under PPC mode because of the superior auto-ignition resistance to prolong ignition delay time. In current experiments, three surrogate fuels with same research octane number (RON77) but different octane sensitivities (OS), PRF77 (S = 0), TPRF77-a (S = 3) and TPRF77-b (S = 5), are tested in a full-transparent single cylinder AVL optical compression ignition (CI) engine at low load conditions.
Aiming at investigating the fuel octane sensitivity effect on engine combustion behavior as well as emissions under GCI-PPC mode, engine parameters, and emission data during combustion are compared for the test fuels with a change of injection timing. In addition, in order to get a deeper insight into fuel OS effect on GCI-PPC mode, high-speed natural flame luminosity (NFL) imaging techniques are used for visualizing in-cylinder combustion processes. The results show that higher octane sensitivity generally lead to delayed start of combustion, prolonged ignition delay time, retarded combustion phasing of CA50 as well as extended combustion duration. At late injection timing of -15 CAD aTDC, higher IMEP is achieved with higher OS fuel along with lower maximum in-cylinder pressure. A 4% increase of IMEP is achieved by the test fuel with highest OS (TPRF77-b) as compared with zero sensitivity fuel (PRF77). Moreover, the fuel spray vaporization process is affected by fuel octane sensitivity, which introduces some bright tiny spots during the combustion process as well as higher UHC and CO emissions, especially for early injection timing.
CitationShi, H., An, Y., and Johansson, B., "Study of Fuel Octane Sensitivity Effects on Gasoline Partially Premixed Combustion Using Optical Diagnostics," SAE Technical Paper 2019-24-0025, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-24-0025.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- An, Y. et al. , “In-Cylinder Combustion and Soot Evolution in the Transition from Conventional Compression Ignition (CI) Mode to Partially Premixed Combustion (PPC) Mode,” 32(2):2306-2320, 2018.
- Saxena, S., Bedoya, I. D. J. P.i. E., and Science, C. , “Fundamental Phenomena Affecting Low Temperature Combustion and HCCI Engines, High Load Limits and Strategies for Extending these Limits,” 39(5):457-488, 2013.
- Fathi, M. et al. , “Modeling and Controller Design Architecture for Cycle-by-Cycle Combustion Control of Homogeneous Charge Compression Ignition (HCCI) Engines-A Comprehensive Review,” 139:1-19, 2017.
- An, Y. et al. , “Numerical Simulation of Combustion and Soot under Partially Premixed Combustion of Low-Octane Gasoline,” 211:420-431, 2018.
- Noehre, C. et al. , “Characterization of Partially Premixed Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3412, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-3412.
- Johansson, B. , “High-Load Partially Premixed Combustion in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine,” in Diesel Engine Emissions Reduction (DEER) Conference, Chicago, Illinois, 2005.
- Lewander, M. et al. , “Investigation of the Combustion Characteristics with Focus on Partially Premixed Combustion in a Heavy Duty Engine,” 1(1):1063-1074, 2009.
- Qiu, L. et al. , “Partially Premixed Combustion Based on Different Injection Strategies in a Light-Duty Diesel Engine,” 96:155-165, 2016.
- Jain, A., Singh, A. P., and Agarwal, A. K. J. A.e. , “Effect of Fuel Injection Parameters on Combustion Stability and Emissions of a Mineral Diesel Fueled Partially Premixed Charge Compression Ignition (PCCI) Engine,” 190:658-669, 2017.
- Li, Z. et al. , “Effect of Dimethyl Ether (DME) Addition on Sooting Limits in Counterflow Diffusion Flames of Ethylene at Elevated Pressures,” 197:463-470, 2018.
- Shen, M. et al. , “Effects of EGR and Intake Pressure on PPC of Conventional Diesel, Gasoline and Ethanol in a Heavy Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-2702, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-2702.
- Manente, V., Johansson, B., and Tunestal, P. , “Partially Premixed Combustion at High Load Using Gasoline and Ethanol, a Comparison with Diesel,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-0944, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0944.
- Manente, V., Tunestål P., and Johansson B. , “Half Load Partially Premixed Combustion, PPC, with High Octane Number Fuels. Gasoline and Ethanol Compared with Diesel,” in Symposium on International Automotive Technology: SIAT 2009, 2009.
- Manente, V., Johansson, B., and Cannella, W. J. I. J.o. E. R. , “Gasoline Partially Premixed Combustion, the Future of Internal Combustion Engines?” 12(3):194-208, 2011.
- Kalghatgi, G. T., Risberg, P., and Ångström, H.-E. , “Partially Pre-Mixed Auto-Ignition of Gasoline to Attain Low Smoke and Low NOx at High Load in a Compression Ignition Engine and Comparison with a Diesel Fuel,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0006, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0006.
- Hildingsson, L. et al. , “Fuel Octane Effects in the Partially Premixed Combustion Regime in Compression Ignition Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2648, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2648.
- Leermakers, C. et al. , “Low Octane Fuel Composition Effects on the Load Range Capability of Partially Premixed Combustion,” 135:210-222, 2014.
- Chang, J. et al. , “Enabling High Efficiency Direct Injection Engine with Naphtha Fuel through Partially Premixed Charge Compression Ignition Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0677, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0677.
- Shankar, B. et al. , Primary Reference Fuels (PRFs) as Surrogates for Low Sensitivity Gasoline Fuels. 2016.
- Mittal, V. et al. , “The Underlying Physics and Chemistry behind Fuel Sensitivity,” 3(1):256-265, 2010.
- American Society of Testing Materials , D-2699 and D-2700, “ASTM Research Method ASTM D 908-56 and ASTM Motor Method ASTM D 357-56,” 1956.
- Sarathy, S. M. et al. , “Compositional Effects on the Ignition of FACE Gasolines,” 169:171-193, 2016.
- Pitz, W. J. et al. , “Development of an Experimental Database and Chemical Kinetic Models for Surrogate Gasoline Fuels,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0175, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0175.
- Jain, S. K., Badhe A. S., and Aggarwal S. K. , “Effect of Fuel Sensitivity on PAH Emissions in Low-Octane Naphtha Partially Premixed Flames,” in 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018.
- Leppard , W.R.J.S.t., “The Chemical Origin of Fuel Octane Sensitivity,” 1990: 862-876.
- Westbrook, C. K. et al. , “Chemical Kinetics of Octane Sensitivity in a Spark-Ignition Engine,” 175:2-15, 2017.
- Jain, S. K. and Aggarwal, S. K. J. F. , “Compositional Effects on the Ignition and Combustion of Low Octane Fuels under Diesel Conditions,” 220:654-670, 2018.
- Javed, T. et al. , “Ignition Studies of N-Heptane/Iso-Octane/Toluene Blends,” 171:223-233, 2016.
- Javed, T. et al. , “Ignition Delay Measurements of Light Naphtha: A Fully Blended Low Octane Fuel,” 36(1):315-322, 2017.
- Singh, E. et al. , “Chemical Kinetic Insights into the Octane Number and Octane Sensitivity of Gasoline Surrogate Mixtures,” 31(2):1945-1960, 2017.
- Szybist, J. P., Splitter, D. A. J. C., and Flame , “Pressure and Temperature Effects on Fuels with Varying Octane Sensitivity at High Load in SI Engines,” 177:49-66, 2017.
- Morgan, N. et al. , “Mapping Surrogate Gasoline Compositions into RON/MON Space,” 157(6):1122-1131, 2010.
- An, Y. et al. , “Combustion Stability Study of Partially Premixed Combustion with Low-Octane Fuel at Low Engine Load Conditions,” 235:56-67, 2019.
- An, Y. et al. , “Analysis of Transition from HCCI to CI Via PPC with Low Octane Gasoline Fuels Using Optical Diagnostics and Soot Particle Analysis,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2403, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-2403.