This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Risk Assessment of Fuel Property Variability Using Quasi-Random Sampling/Design of Experiments Methodologies
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published March 19, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Event: AeroTech Americas
Increases in on-board heat generation in modern military aircraft have led to a reliance on thermal management techniques using fuel as a primary heat sink. However, recent studies have found that fuel properties, such as specific heat, can vary greatly between batches, affecting the amount of heat delivered to the fuel. With modern aircraft systems utilizing the majority of available heat sink capacity, an improved understanding of the effects of fuel property variability on overall system response is important. One way to determine whether property variability inside a thermal system causes failure is to perform uncertainty analyses on fuel thermophysical properties and compare results to a risk assessment metric. A sensitivity analysis can be performed on any properties that cause inherent system variability to determine which properties contribute the most significant impact. For the current study, a quasi-random sampling based uncertainty analysis was combined with a surrogate model based sensitivity analysis. Combining sample based and surrogate-based methodologies provided statistical information from the sampling based approach and sensitivity information from the design of experiments from one test series. Using the two methods simultaneously combined the advantages of both methods, while reducing the number of trials required for a statistically significant sample. The methodologies were applied to fuel property variability by sampling deviating thermophysical properties and analyzing the system impact for a sample mission profile. The fuel property variabilities examined were fuel density, specific heat, viscosity, and thermal conductivity. The analysis utilized the architecture’s feed tank temperature as the failure metric and the probability of system failure was determined using a confidence interval. The determined point of failure was analyzed using a sensitivity analysis to determine dominant fuel properties. The sample sizes were compared using computation time and sample size effect on statistical variation to determine the optimal setting for risk analysis.
CitationMcCarthy, K. and Jackson, G., "Risk Assessment of Fuel Property Variability Using Quasi-Random Sampling/Design of Experiments Methodologies," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1387, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-1387.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
- Hadaller , O.J. and Johnson , J.M. 2006 47 53
- Miller B. , Johnson D. , Thompson T. , Rosenberg F. et al. 2018
- McKay , M.D. , Beckman , R.J. , and Conover , W.J. Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code Technometrics 42 1 55 61 2000 10.1080/00401706.2000.10485979
- Kim , K. and Braatz , R. Generalized Polynomial Chaos Expansion Approaches to Approximate Stochastic Model Predictive Control International Journal of Control 86 8 1324 1337 2013 10.1080/00207179.2013.801082
- Cressie , P. Statistics of Spatial Data New York John Wiley & Sons 2015 119 978-1-119-11461-1
- Allen , M. and Camberos , J. Comparison of Uncertainty Propagation/Response Surface Techniques for Two Aeroelastic Systems AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference 2009 10.2514/6.2009-2269
- Simulink (Version 9.2) 1994-2018
- Eder , M. Aviation Fuels with Improved Fire Safety: A Proceedings: Engine Fuel System Design Issues 61 78 1997 10.17226/5871
- Kreyszing , E. Advanced Engineering Mathematics Tenth Hoboken, NJ John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2011 1074 1075 978-0-470-45836-5
- Giunta , A. , McFarland , M. , Swiler , L. , and Eldred , M. The Promise and Peril of Uncertainty Quantification Using Response Surface Approximations Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 2 3-4 175 189 10.1080/15732470600590507
- Design Expert (Version 10) 2017