This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Application of Collision Probability Estimation to Calibration of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems
Technical Paper
2019-01-1133
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) are designed and calibrated rigorously to provide them with the robustness against highly uncertain environments that they usually operate in. Typical calibration procedures for such systems rely extensively on track (controlled environment) testing, which is time-consuming, expensive, and sometimes cannot cover all the critical test scenarios that could be encountered by ADAS in the real world. Therefore, virtual (simulation-based) testing and validation has been gaining more prominence and emphasis for ensuring high coverage along with easier scalability and usage. This paper attempts to provide an alternative approach for calibrating ADAS in the controller validation phase by the aid of simulated test case scenarios. The study executes characterization of the uncertainty in the position and heading of the ego and the obstacle vehicles. This exercise captures the uncertainties in the states detection of vehicles in the environment and localization errors of the states of the ego vehicle. Following it, the approach estimates the probability of collision between the two vehicles for a given trajectory through a Monte Carlo approach. For illustration purposes, the method is then applied on tuning a Lane Change Assistance System for a four-wheel sedan equipped with Short-Range and Long-Range Radar Sensors.
Recommended Content
Topic
Citation
Bithar, V. and Karumanchi, A., "Application of Collision Probability Estimation to Calibration of Advanced Driver Assistance Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1133, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-1133.Data Sets - Support Documents
| Title | Description | Download |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Dataset 1 |
Also In
References
- Koopman , P. and Wagner , M. Challenges in Autonomous Vehicle Testing and Validation SAE Int. J. Trans. Safety 4 1 15 24 2016 10.4271/2016-01-012810
- Xiao , L. and Gao , F. A Comprehensive Review of the Development of Adaptive Cruise Control Systems Vehicle System Dynamics 48 10 1167 1192 2010 10.1080/00423110903365910
- http://www.toyota-global.com/company/history_of_toyota/75years/data/automotive_business/products_technology/technology_development/electronics_parts/index.html
- Skogestad , S. and Postlethwaite , I. Multivariable Feedback Control Analysis and Design John Wiley & Sons, Inc 1996 0-471-94330-4
- Hayward , J 1972
- Van der Horst , R. and Hogema , J. Time-to-Collision and Collision Avoidance Systems Proceedings of 6th ICTCT Workshop Safety Evaluation of Traffic Systems: Traffic Conflicts and Other Measures 109 121 1993
- Katrakazas , C. , Quddus , M. , Chen , W. , and Deka , L. Real-time Motion Planning Methods for Autonomous On-Road Driving: State-of-the-art and Future Research Directions Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 60 416 442 2015 10.1016/j.trc.2015.09.011
- Paden , B. , Cap , M. , Yong , S.Z. , Yershov , D.S. et al. A Survey of Motion Planning and Control Techniques for Self-Driving Urban Vehicles IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles 1 1 2016
- Svensson , L. and Eriksson , J. 2015
- Zhou , J. and Peng , H. String Stability Conditions of Adaptive Cruise Control Algorithms IFAC Symp. Advances Automotive Control 37 22 649 654 2004 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)30417-2
- Montgomery , D. Design and Analysis of Experiments 9th John Wiley Sons, Inc 2017 9781119320937
- Michael , J. , Segal , A.C. , and Patwardhan , S. Validation of Software Testing Results for Real-time Vehicle Control Software SAE Technical Paper 951927 1995 10.4271/951927
- Touran , A. , Brackstone , M. , and McDonald , M. A Collision Model for Safety Evaluation of Autonomous Intelligent Cruise Control Accident Analysis and Prevention 31 5 567578 1999
- Godbole , D.N. , Sengupta , R. , Misener , J. , Kourjanskaia , N. et al. Benefit Evaluation of Crash Avoidance Systems Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1621 1 19 1998
- Gietelink , O. 2007
- Zhao , D. , Lam , H. , Peng , H. , Bao , S. et al. Accelerated Evaluation of Automated Vehicles Safety in Lane-Change Scenarios Based on Importance Sampling Techniques IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 18 3 595 607 2017 10.1109/TITS.2016.2582208
- Du Toit , N. and Burdick , J. Probabilistic Collision Checking With Chance Constraints IEEE Transactions on Robotics 27 4 809 815 2011 10.1109/TRO.2011.211619010
- Lambert , A. , Gruyer , D. and Saint Pierre , G. A fast Monte Carlo Algorithm for Collision Probability Estimation 10th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision 2008 406 411 10.1109/ICARCV.2008.4795553
- https://tass.plm.automation.siemens.com/prescan