This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Experimental Setup Enabling Self-Confrontation Interviews for Modelling Naturalistic Driving Behavior
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 02, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Behavioral models of traffic actors have a potential of unlocking sophisticated safety features and mitigating several challenges of urban automated driving. Intuitively, volunteers driving on routes of daily commuting in their private vehicles are the preferred source of information to be captured by data collection system. Such dataset can then serve as a basis for identifying efficient methods of context representation and parameterization of behavioral models. This paper describes the experimental setup supporting the development of driver behavioral models within the SIMUSAFE project. In particular, the paper presents an IoT data acquisition and analysis infrastructure supporting self-confrontation interviews with drivers. The proposed retrofit system was installed in private vehicles of volunteers in two European cities. Wherever possible, the setup used open source software and electronic components available on consumer market. Collected data about traffic context and driver behavior were automatically uploaded to cloud storage for immediate analysis by traffic psychologists and support of self-confrontation interviews. The timely availability of data for analysis and a very limited impact of the system on driver behavior are the key contributions of the proposed solution.
|Technical Paper||User-centered Human-Machine-Interaction (HMI) Design for Automotive Systems|
|Technical Paper||Safe Interaction for Drivers: A Review of Driver Distraction Guidelines and Design Implications|
CitationCieslar, D., Sasin, D., Wyszynski, G., Limonad, L. et al., "Experimental Setup Enabling Self-Confrontation Interviews for Modelling Naturalistic Driving Behavior," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-1082, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-1082.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
- Lefèvre , S. , Vasquez , D. , and Laugier , C. A Survey on Motion Prediction and Risk Assessment for Intelligent Vehicles ROBOMECH Journal 1 1 1 2014 10.1186/s40648-014-0001-z
- The SIMUSAFE Consortium simusafe.eu
- Ajzen , I. The Theory of Planned Behavior Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50 2 179 211 1991 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
- Ketphat , M. , Kanitpong , K. , and Jiwattanakulpaisarn , P. Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Predict Young Drivers’ Speeding Behavior Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies 10 2031 2048 2013 10.11175/easts.10.2031
- Bazargan-Hejazi , S. , Teruya , S. , Pan , D. , Lin , J. et al. The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) and Texting While Driving Behavior in College Students Traffic Injury Prevention 18 1 56 62 2017 10.1080/15389588.2016.1172703
- Wallén Warner , H. and Åberg , L. Drivers’ Beliefs about Exceeding the Speed Limits Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 11 5 376 389 2008 10.1016/j.trf.2008.03.002
- Parker , D. , Manstead , A.S.R. , Stradling , S.G. , and Reason , J.T. Determinants of Intention to Commit Driving Violations Accident Analysis & Prevention 24 2 117 131 1992 10.1016/0001-4575(92)90028-H
- Particke , F. , Hofmann , Ch. , Hiller , M. , Bey , H. et al. Entropy-Based Intention Change Detection with a Multi-Hypotheses Filter 21st Int. Conf. on Information Fusion 2018 610 616 10.23919/ICIF.2018.8455678
- Mollo , V. and Falzon , P. Auto-and Allo-Confrontation as Tools for Reflective Activities Applied Ergonomics 35 6 531 540 2004 10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.003
- Henry , S.G. and Fetters , M.D. Video Elicitation Interviews: A Qualitative Research Method for Investigating Physician-Patient Interactions Annals of Family Medicine 10 2 118 125 2012 10.1370/afm.1339
- Docker, Inc https://www.docker.com/