This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Emissions from Low- and Mid-Level Blends of Anhydrous Ethanol in Gasoline
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 2, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Typically ethanol is present in gasoline as a 10% blend by volume (E10), although E15, E85 (51 to 83%), and E0 are also available at selected stations. Numerous studies of tailpipe regulated emissions have been conducted to compare emissions from E10 and E0, and there is a growing body of literature addressing blends of E15 and higher. Isolating the effect of ethanol in a study is philosophically difficult, because the ethanol naturally displaces some hydrocarbons, because the ethanol interacts with the remaining gasoline, and because properties of mixing are often nonlinear. Some studies have used splash blending, simply mixing the ethanol with a reference gasoline to produce a blend for comparison to the reference. Others have used match blending, where the objective is to match selected properties of the blend to properties of a reference gasoline. Recent studies have examined both port injected and direct injected engines, the latter being both naturally aspirated and turbocharged, and differing test cycles have been used. In consequence, the conclusions of the studies are not uniform. This paper examines the available data and statistical analyses to determine the effects of blending approach, engine technology and test cycle on the comparative emissions. Of central interest are the parameters selected as study variables or to be held constant in match blending of fuels at different ethanol levels. Distillation matching must acknowledge the effect of ethanol on the curve, demanding correction by selective addition of hydrocarbons. Some multivariate studies have employed aromatic content and the particle mass index for additional matching With splash blending studies, the parameters vary by inherent nature of the mix, and octane number (ON) rises with ethanol content. Statistics and causes behind variability of results are explained, and the match blends employed in studies are compared with common refinery practice in producing gasoline. Results demonstrate the importance of including all multivariate study parameters for emissions prediction.
CitationClark, N., Klein, T., Higgins, T., and McKain, D., "Emissions from Low- and Mid-Level Blends of Anhydrous Ethanol in Gasoline," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0997, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0997.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
- Argonne National Laboratory GREET Model, https://greet.es.anl.gov/net, accessed October 10, 2018.
- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/corporate-average-fuel-economy, accessed October 29, 2018.
- Durbin, T.D., Miller, J.W., Younglove, T., Huai, T. et al., “Effects of Ethanol and Volatility Parameters on Exhaust Emissions,” Report, CRC Project No. E-67, Coordinating Research Council, Alpharetta, GA, 2006.
- West, B.H., Sluder, C.S., Knoll, K.E., Orban, J.E. et al., “Intermediate Ethanol Blends Catalyst Durability Program,” Oak Ridge National Laboratory, ORNL/TM-2011/234, 2012.
- Environmental Protection Agency, “Assessing the Effect of Five Gasoline Properties from Light-Duty Vehicles Certified to Tier 2 Standards: Analysis of Data from EPAct Phase 3 (EPAct/V2/E-89), Final Report,” EPA 420-R-13-002, 2013 [additional detail is available at https://www.epa.gov/moves/EPActv2e-89-tier-2-gasoline-fuel-effects-study].
- Environmental Protection Agency, “Assessing the Effect of Five Gasoline Properties from Light-Duty Vehicles Certified to Tier 2 Standards: Final Report on Program Design and Data Collection,” EPA 420-R-13-004, 2013.
- Whitney, K., “Effect of Gasoline Properties on Exhaust Emissions from Tier 2 Light-Duty Vehicles - Final Report: Phase 3,” (Part of EPAct/V2/E-89) National Renewable Energy Laboratory Subcontract Report, NREL/SR-5400-61098, 2014.
- Morgan, P., Smith, I., Premnath, V. and Kroll, S., “Evaluation and Investigation of Fuel Effects on Gaseous and Particulate Emissions on SIDI In-use Vehicles,” CRC Report E-94-2, Coordinating Research Council, Alpharetta, GA, 2017.
- Environmental Protection Agency, “Control of Air Pollution from Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards Final Rule, Regulatory Impact Analysis,” EPA-420-R-14-005, March 2014.
- International Council on Clean Transportation, “An Introduction to Petroleum Refining and The Production of Ultra Low Sulfur Gasoline and Diesel Fuel,” Prepared for The ICCT by MathPro, October 2011, available at www.theicct.org.
- Jechura, J. (Colorado School of Mines), “Product Blending & Optimization Considerations,” July 2018, https://inside.mines.edu/~jjechura/Refining/11_Blending_Optimization.pdf.
- Jechura, J. (Colorado School of Mines), “Refinery Feedstocks & Products Properties and Specifications, Colorado School of Mines, July 2018, https://inside.mines.edu/~jjechura/Refining/02_Feedstocks_&_Products.pdf.
- National Petroleum Refiners Association, “NPRA Survey of Refining Operations and Gasoline Quality,” 1990.
- Bishop, G.A., Hoekman, K., and Broch, A., “Evaluation of Emissions Benefits of Federal Reformulated Gasoline versus Conventional Gasoline,” CRC Report E-123-2, Coordinating Research Council, Alpharetta, GA, 2017.
- Anderson, J.E., Wallington, T.J., Stein, R.A., and Studzinski, W.M., “Issues with T50 and T90 as Match Criteria for Ethanol-Gasoline Blends,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr 7(3):1027-1040, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-9080.
- Anderson, J.E., Kramer, U., Mueller, S.A., and Wallington, T.J., “Octane Numbers of Ethanol- and Methanol-Gasoline Blends Estimated from Molar Concentrations,” Energy & Fuels 24:6576-6585, 2010, doi:10.1021/ef101125c.
- Environmental Protection Agency, “Vehicle and Emissions Testing Dynamometer Drive Schedules,” www.epa.gov/vehicle-and-fuel-emissions-testing/dynamometer-drive-schedules, accessed Oct. 29, 2018.
- Morgan, P., Smith, I., Premnath, V., and Kroll, S., “Evaluation and Investigation of Fuel Effects on Gaseous and Particulate Emissions on SIDI In-use Vehicles,” CRC Report E-94-1, Coordinating Research Council, Alpharetta, GA, 2014.
- Morgan, P. and Lobato, P., “Evaluation and Investigation of Fuel Effects on Gaseous and Particulate Emissions on SIDI In-use Vehicles,” CRC Report E-94-1a, Coordinating Research Council, Alpharetta, GA, 2014.
- Morgan, P., Lobato, P., Premnath, V., Kroll, S. et al. “Impacts of Splash-Blending on Particulate Emissions for SIDI Engines,” CRC Report E-94-3, Coordinating Research Council, Alpharetta, GA, 2018.
- Schifter, I., Dfaz, L., Avalos, S., Vera, M. et al., “Effect of Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Concentrations on Exhaust Emissions from Gasoline Used in the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City,” Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 50(4):488-494, 2000, doi:10.1080/10473289.2000.10464042.
- Environmental Protection Agency, “MOVES and other Mobile Source Emissions Models,” www.epa.gov/moves, accessed Oct. 20, 2018.
- Sobotowski, R.A., Butler, A., and Guerra, Z., “A Pilot Study of Fuel Impacts on PM Emissions from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr 8(1):214-233, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-9071.
- Aikawa, K., Sakurai, T., and Jetter, J.J., “Development of a Predictive Model for Gasoline Vehicle Particulate Matter Emissions,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr 3(2):610-622, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-2115.
- Butler, A.D., Sobotowski, R.A., Hoffman, G.J., and Machiele, P., “Influence of Fuel PM Index and Ethanol Content on Particulate Emissions from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1072, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1072.
- Haskew, H. and Liberty, T., “Exhaust and Evaporative Emissions Testing of Flexible-Fuel Vehicles (CRC E-80), Coordinating Research Council, Alpharetta, GA, 2011.
- Vertin, K., Glinsky, G., and Reek, A., “Comparative Emissions Testing of Vehicles Aged on E0, E15, and E20 Fuels,” National Renewable Energy Laboratory Subcontract Report, NREL/SR-5400-55778, 2012.
- Maricq, M.M., Szente, J.J., and Jahr, K., “The Impact of Ethanol Fuel Blends on PM Emissions from a Light-Duty GDI Vehicle,” Aerosol Science & Technology 46:576-583, 2012.
- Schulz, M. and Clark, S., “Vehicle Emissions and Fuel Economy Effects of 16% Butanol and Various Ethanol Blended Fuels (E10, E20 and E85),” Journal of ASTM International 8(2), Paper ID JAI103068, 2011.
- Graham, L.A., Belisle, S.L., and Baas, C.-L., “Emissions from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles Operating on Low Blend Ethanol Gasoline and E85,” Atmospheric Environment 42:4498-4516, 2008.
- Yassine, M.K. and La Pan, M., “Impact of Ethanol Fuels on Regulated Tailpipe Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0872, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0872.
- Cooney, C., Wallner, T., McConnell, S., Gillen, J.C. et al., “Effects of Blending Gasoline with Ethanol and Butanol on Engine Efficiency and Emissions Using a Direct-Injection, Spark-Ignited Engine,” in ASME Internal Combustion Engine Division Conference, Paper ICES2009-76155, 2009.
- Hubbard, C.P., Anderson, J.E., and Wallington, T.J., “Ethanol and Air Quality: Influence of Fuel Ethanol Content on Emissions and Fuel Economy of Flexible Fuel Vehicles,” Environmental Science & Technology 48:861-867, 2014.
- Wallner, T., Ickes, A., Lawyer, K., Miers, S. et al., “Meeting RFS2 Targets with an E10/E15-Like Fuel - Experimental and Analytical Assessment of Higher Alcohols in Multi-Component Blends with Gasoline,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr 6(3):691-701, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-2612.
- Suarez-Bertoa, R., Zardini, A.A., Keuken, H., and Astorga, C., “Impact of Ethanol Containing Gasoline Blends on Emissions from a Flex-Fuel Vehicle Tested over the Worldwide Harmonized Light-Duty Test Cycle (WLTC),” Fuel 143:173-182, 2015.
- Karavalakis, G., Durbin, T.D., Yang, J., Ventura, L. et al., “Fuel Effects on PM Emissions from Different Vehicle/Engine Configurations: A Literature Review,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0349, 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-0349.
- Raza, M., Chen, L., Leach, F., and Ding, S., “A Review of Particulate Number (PN) Emissions from Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) Engines and Their Control Techniques,” Energies 11:1417, 2018, doi:10.3390/en11061417.
- Stein, R., Anderson, J., and Wallington, T., “An Overview of the Effects of Ethanol-Gasoline Blends on SI Engine Performance, Fuel Efficiency, and Emissions,” SAE Int. J. Engines 6, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1635.
- Chan, T., Lax, D., Gunter, G., Hendren, J. et al., “Assessment of the Fuel Composition Impact on Black Carbon Mass, Particle Number Size Distributions, Solid Particle Number, Organic Materials, and Regulated Gaseous Emissions from a Light-Duty Gasoline Direct Injection Truck and Passenger Car,” Energy & Fuels 31, 2017.
- Darlington, T., Kahlbaum, D., Van Hulzen, S., and Furey, R., “Analysis of EPAct Emission Data Using T70 as an Additional Predictor of PM Emissions from Tier 2 Gasoline Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0996, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0996.
- American Petroleum Institute, “Determination of the Potential Property Ranges of Mid-Level Ethanol Blends,” Washington, DC, April 23, 2010.
- Fuel Trends Report: Gasoline 2006 - 2016, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, EPA-420-R-17-005, October 2017.
- Jewitt, C.H., Gibbs, L.M., and Evans, B., “Gasoline Drivability Index, Ethanol Content and Cold-Start/Warm-Up Vehicle Performance,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-3864, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-3864.