This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Compensation Strategies for Aging Effects of Common-Rail Injector Nozzles
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 2, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The thermal and emission efficiency of diesel engines depends to a large extent on the quality of fuel injection. However, over engine lifetime, injection rate and quality will change due to adverse nozzle aging effects, such as coking or cavitation. In this study, we discuss the influences of these effects on injection and heat release rate. The injection rates of previously unused nozzles and a nozzle that had been operated in a vehicle engine were compared in order to clarify the impact of aging effects. The key to the detection of alterations of injection nozzles is the identification of strongly correlating parameters. As a first step, an instrumented injector was set up to measure fuel pressure inside the feed line of the injector and the lift of the control piston. Different nozzles showed a distinguishable control piston motion depending on their different geometric specifications, which also affect the injection rates. In a second step, engine simulations were performed to investigate the impact of nozzle aging on heat release rate and engine performance of a single-cylinder engine. The predictive combustion model employed simulated injection rates to calculate the heat release rates. The geometric parameters of the different nozzles strongly influenced the respective heat release rates. Different compensating strategies for these effects were compared regarding their emission potential. Adapting the rail pressure to compensate for load losses due to high coking levels led to very high necessary rail pressures. The combined adaptation of rail pressure and energizing time to compensate for nozzle wear or erosion resulted in the best NOx emissions. This study closes the knowledge gap between the effects of nozzle aging and the best method to compensate for them.
CitationSchuckert, S., Huthmacher, M., and Wachtmeister, G., "Compensation Strategies for Aging Effects of Common-Rail Injector Nozzles," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0944, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0944.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 9]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 10]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 11]|
- Winterbone, D., Clough, E., Rao, K., Richards, P. et al., “The Effect of DI Nozzle Fouling on Fuel Spray Characteristics,” SAE Technical Paper 922232, 1992, doi:10.4271/922232.
- Barbour, R., Quigley, R., Browne, D., and Panesar, A., “A Comparison of DW10 Dynamometer and Vehicle Engine Performance,” in 8th International Colloquium Fuels, Filderstadt, Germany, 2011.
- Williams, R., Smith, A., and Buttery, I., “Formation and Removal of Injector Nozzle Deposits in Modern Diesel Cars,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 6(1):230-240, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1684.
- d'Ambrosio, S. and Ferrari, A., “Diesel Injector Coking: Optical-Chemical Analysis of Deposits and Influence on Injected Flow-Rate, Fuel Spray and Engine Performance,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 134(6):062801, 2012, doi:10.1115/1.4005991.
- Ikemoto, M., Omae, K., Nakai, K., Ueda, R. et al., “Injection Nozzle Coking Mechanism in Common-Rail Diesel Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(1):78-87, 2012, doi:10.4271/2011-01-1818.
- Birgel, A., Ladommatos, N., Aleiferis, P., Zülch, S. et al., “Deposition Formation in the Holes of Diesel Injector Nozzles: A Critical Review,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2383, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-2383.
- Argueyrolles, B., Dehoux, S., Gastaldi, P., Grosjean, L. et al., “Influence of Injector Nozzle Design and Cavitation on Coking Phenomenon,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1896, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-1896.
- Pos, R., Cracknell, R., and Ganippa, L., “Transient Characteristics of Diesel Sprays from a Deposit Rich Injector,” Fuel 153:183-191, 2015, doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.114.
- Magno, A., Mancaruso, E., and Vaglieco, B.M., “Experimental Investigation in an Optically Accessible Diesel Engine of a Fouled Piezoelectric Injector,” Energy 64:842-852, 2014, doi:10.1016/j.energy.2013.10.071.
- Bosch, W., “The Fuel Rate Indicator: A New Measuring Instrument for Display of the Characteristics of Individual Injection,” SAE Technical Paper 660749, 1966, doi:10.4271/660749.
- Hofmann, O., Strauß, P., Schuckert, S., Huber, B. et al., “Identification of Aging Effects in Common Rail Diesel Injectors Using Geometric Classifiers and Neural Networks,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0813, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0813.
- Hofmann, O., Han, S., and Rixen, D., “Common Rail Diesel Injectors with Nozzle Wear: Modeling and State Estimation,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0543, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0543.
- Payri, R., Gimeno, J., Novella, R., and Bracho, G., “On the Rate of Injection Modeling Applied to Direct Injection Compression Ignition Engines,” Int. J. Engine Res. 17(19):1015-1030, 2016, doi:10.1177/1468087416636281.
- Schuckert, S., Wachtmeister, G., “Characteristics of Control Piston Motion and Pressure inside of a Common Rail Diesel Injector,” in 28th Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems, Valencia, Spain, 2017, doi:10.4995/ILASS2017.2017.6454.
- Gamma Technologies, “Engine Performance Application Manual - Version 2017,” 2017.
- Piano, A., Millo, F., Boccardo, G., Rafigh, M. et al., “Assessment of the Predictive Capabilities of a Combustion Model for a Modern Common Rail Automotive Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0547, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0547.
- Deb, K. and Jain, H., “An Evolutionary Many-Objective Optimization Algorithm Using Reference-Point-Based Nondominated Sorting Approach, Part I: Solving Problems with Box Constraints,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 18(04):577-601, 2014, doi:10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535.
- Hiroyasu, H., Kadota, T., and Arai, M., “Development and Use of a Spray Combustion Modeling to Predict Diesel Engine Efficiency and Pollutant Emissions,” Bulletin of the JSME 26(214):569-575, 1983, doi:10.1299/jsme1958.26.569.
- Miyaki, M., Takeuchi, K., Ishizuka, K., and Sasaki, S., “The Breakthrough of Common Rail System: Closed-Loop Control Strategy Using Injector with Built-In Pressure Sensor,” 30, in Internationales Wiener Motoren Symposium, Vienna, Austria, 2009.
- Schuckert, S., Hofmann, O., and Wachtmeister, G., “Aging Effects of Common Rail Injector Nozzles: Influences on Injection Rate, Spray Characteristics, and Engine Performance,” in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, under review, 2018.