This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Accuracy and Speed for Scale-Resolving Simulations of the DrivAer Reference Model
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 02, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
In aerodynamic development of ground vehicles, the use of Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is crucial for improving the aerodynamic performance, stability and comfort of the vehicle. Simulation time and accuracy are two key factors of a well working CFD procedure. Using scale-resolving simulations, accurate predictions of the flow field and aerodynamic forces are possible, but often leads to long simulation time. For a given solver, one of the most significant aspects of the simulation time/cost is the temporal resolution. In this study, this aspect is investigated using the realistic vehicle model DrivAer with the notchback geometry as the test case. To ensure a direct and accurate comparison with wind tunnel measurements, performed at TU Berlin, a large section of the wind tunnel is included in the simulation domain. All simulations are performed at a Reynolds number of 3.12 million, based on the vehicle length. Three spatial resolutions were compared, where it could be seen that a hybrid element mesh consisting of 102 million cells only revealed small differences to the finest mesh investigated, well as showing excellent agreement with wind tunnel measurements. An investigation of the temporal resolution is performed, in order to see its effect on the simulation time/cost and accuracy of the results. The finest temporal resolution resulted in a Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy number less than unity, while the coarsest reached a CFL number of around 100. From these results, it is seen that it is possible to reduce the simulation time with more than 90 % (CFL 20) and still keep sufficient accuracy of the forces and important features of the flow field.
CitationEkman, P., Larsson, T., Virdung, T., and Karlsson, M., "Accuracy and Speed for Scale-Resolving Simulations of the DrivAer Reference Model," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0639, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0639.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Serre, E., Minguez, M., Pasquetti, R., Guilmineau, E. et al., “On Simulating the Turbulent Flow around the AHMED BODY: A French-German Collaborative Evaluation of LES and DES,” Computers and Fluids 78:10-23, 2013, doi:10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.05.017.
- Krajnovic, S. and Davidson, L., “Large-Eddy Simulation of the Flow around Simplified Car Model,” SAE Technical Paper 2004-01-0227, 2004, doi:10.4271/2004-01-0227.
- Hinterberger, C., García-Villalba, M., and Rodi, W., “Large Eddy Simulation of Flow around the Ahmed Body,” . In: McCallen R., Browand F., and Ross J., editors. The Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles: Trucks, Buses, and Trains. Lecture Notes in Applied and Computational Mechanics. Vol. 19. (Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer, 2004), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-44419-0_7.
- Spalart, P.R., Jou, W.H., Strelets, M., and Allmaras, S.R., “Comments on the Feasibility of LES for Wings and on a Hybrid, RANS/LES Approach,” Adv. DNS/LES, Proc. 1st AFOSR Int. Conf. DNS/LES, 1997, vol. 1, 137-147.
- Heft, A., Indinger, T., and Adams, N., “Introduction of a New Realistic Generic Car Model for Aerodynamic Investigations,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0168, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0168.
- Ahmed, S.R., Ramm, G., and Faltin, G., “Some Salient Features of the Time-Averaged Ground Vehicle Wake,” SAE Technical Paper 840300, 1984, doi:10.4271/840300.
- Cogotti, A., “A Parametric Study of the Ground Effect of a Simplified Car Model,” SAE Technical Paper 980031, 1998, doi:10.4271/980031.
- Strangfeld, C., Wieser, D., Schmidt, H., Woszidlo, R. et al., “Experimental Study of Baseline Flow Characteristics for the Realistic Car Model DrivAer,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1251, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1251.
- Wieser, D., Schmidt, H., Müller, S., Strangfeld, C. et al., “Experimental Comparison of the Aerodynamic Behavior of Fastback and Notchback DrivAer Models,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 7(2):682-691, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0613.
- Wieser, D., Nayeri, C.N., Paschereit, C.O., “Experiments with Vortex Generators applied to a Notchback Car Model,” 53rd AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Science and Technology Forum, 2015, doi:10.2514/6.2015-1236.
- Wieser, D., Lang, H., Nayeri, C., and Paschereit, C., “Manipulation of the Aerodynamic Behavior of the DrivAer Model with Fluidic Oscillators,” SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars - Mech. Syst. 8(2):687-702, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1540.
- Leonard, B., “The ULTIMATE Conservative Difference Scheme Applied to Unsteady One-Dimensional Advection,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 88(1):17-74, 1991.
- Menter, F.R., “A New Paradigm in Hybrid RANS-LES Modeling,” Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Hybrid RANS-LES Methods, 2016, 1-17.
- Ekman, P., Gårdhagen, R., Virdung, T., and Karlsson, M., “Evaluation of the Stress Blended Eddy Simulation Model for External Aerodynamic Applications,” presentation at ANSYS Automotive Simulation World Congress, Munich, June 2016.
- Menter, F.R., “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA Journal 32(8):1598-1605, 1994.
- Germano, M., Piomelli, U., Moin, P., and Cabot, W.H., “A Dynamic Subgrid-Scale Eddy Viscosity Model,” Physics of Fluids A 3:1760, 1991, doi:10.1063/1.857955.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice, “Guidelines for Aerodynamic Assessment of Medium and Heavy Commercial Ground Vehicles Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” SAE Standard J2966, Issued Sept. 2013.
- Ashton, N., Unterlechner, P., and Blacha, T., “Assessing the Sensitivity of Hybrid RANS-LES Simulations to Mesh Resolution, Numerical Schemes and Turbulence Modelling within an Industrial CFD Process,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0709, 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-0709.
- Ashton, N. and Revell, A., “Comparison of RANS and DES Methods for the DrivAer Automotive Body,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1538, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1538.
- Peters, B., Uddin, M., Bain, J., Curley, A. et al., “Simulating DrivAer with Structured Finite Difference Overset Grids,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1536, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1536.
- Ashton, N., West, A., Lardeau, S., and Revell, A., “Assessment of RANS and DES Methods for Realistic Automotive Models,” Computers & Fluids 128:1-15, 2016.