This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Flex Fuel Gasoline-Alcohol Engine for Near Zero Emissions Plug-In Hybrid Long-Haul Trucks
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 02, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Internal combustion engines for plug-in hybrid heavy duty trucks, especially long haul trucks, could play an important role in facilitating use of battery power. Power from a low carbon electricity source could thereby be employed without an unattractive vehicle cost increase or range limitation. The ideal engine should be powered by a widely available affordable liquid fuel, should minimize air pollutant emissions, and should provide lower greenhouse gas emissions. Diesel engines could fall short in meeting these objectives, especially because of high emissions. In this paper we analyze the potential for a flex fuel gasoline-alcohol engine approach for a series hybrid powertrain. In this approach the engine would provide comparable (or possibly greater) efficiency than a diesel engine while also providing 90 around lower NOx emissions than present cleanest diesel engine vehicles. Ethanol or methanol would be employed to increase knock resistance. Engines that could be deployed in the relatively near term could also use high rpm operation and /or water injection, to allow operation with a very small amount of alcohol in addition to a low concentration mixture such as E10 (or possibly with no additional alcohol). Further NOx reduction (by use of higher levels of EGR) and increased efficiency (by use of alcohol enhance heat recovery) could potentially be obtained over a longer term. While the analysis shows the potential for substantial benefits of using this approach, more detailed engine modeling is needed to provide more accurate illustrative engine features.
CitationCohn, D. and Bromberg, L., "Flex Fuel Gasoline-Alcohol Engine for Near Zero Emissions Plug-In Hybrid Long-Haul Trucks," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0565, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0565.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
- Exxon Mobil, “Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040,” http:// corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/energy/energyoutlook/2017- highlights/a-view-to-2040, 2017.
- Anderson, S.C., Miller, J., Minares, R. et al., “Impacts and Mitigation of Excess Diesel-Related NOx Emissions in 11 Major Vehicle Markets,” Nature 545:467-471, May 2017.
- Lefevre, B. and Enrique, A., “Transport Sector Key to Closing World’s Emission’s Gap,” World Resources Institute, Sept. 19, 2014
- Bromberg, L. and Cohn, D., “Ultrahigh Efficiency Alcohol Engines Using Optimized Exhaust Heat Recovery,” U.S. Patent 9234482 (led July 2013)
- Cohn, D. and Bromberg, L., “Dual-Fuel Gasoline-Alcohol Engines for Heavy Duty Trucks: Lower Emissions, Flexible -Fuel Alternative to Diesel Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0888, 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-0888.
- Cummins Westport Press Release, “Cummins Westport Receives 2018 Emissions Certifications for L9N and B6.7N Natural Gas Engines,” Dec. 13, 2017.
- California Air Resources Board, “Heavy-Duty Low NOx,” Dec. 12, 2017, https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/hdlownox/hdlownox.htm.
- State of California Air Resources Board (CARB), “Draft Technology Assessment: Lower NOx Heavy Duty Diesel Engines,” Sept. 2015.
- Olah, G.A., Goeppert, A., and Prakash, G.K.S., Beyond Oil and Gas: the Methanol Economy, Third updated and enlarged edition (Wiley-VCH, 2018).
- Shih, C.F., Zhang, T., and Li, J., “Liquid Sunshine: Opportunities and Pathways to a Green Future for All,” presented at the Meeting for “Opportunities and Challenges for Methanol as a Global Liquid Energy Carrier”, Stanford University, July 31-Aug. 1, 2017.
- Blumberg, P., Bromberg, L., Kang, H., and Tai, C., “Simulation of High Efficiency Heavy Duty SI Engines Using Direct Injection of Alcohol for Knock Avoidance,” SAE Int. J. Engines 1(1):1186-1195, 2009.
- Leone, T.G., Anderson, J.E., Davis, R.S., Iqbal, A. et al., “The Effect of Compression Ratio, Fuel Octane Rating, and Ethanol Content on Spark-Ignition Engine Efficiency,” Environmental Science & Technology 49(18):10778-10789, 2015, doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b01420L.
- Lewis, R.A., “High Compression Ratio Turbo Gasoline Engine Operation Using Alcohol Enhancement,” MIT thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, 2015, http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85488.
- Jo, Y., Bromberg, L., and Heywood, J., “Optimal Use of Ethanol in Dual Fuel Applications: Effects of Engine Downsizing, Spark Retard, and Compression Ratio on Fuel Economy,” SAE Int. J. Engines 9(2):2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0786.
- Mehl, M., Pitz, W.J., Westbrook, C.K. et al., “Kinetic Modeling of Gasoline Surrogate Components and Mixture under Engine Conditions,” Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 33:193-200, 2011.
- Heiduk, T., Kuhn, M., Stichmeir, M., “The New 1.8 L TFSI Engine from Audi, Part 2 Mixture Formation, Combustion and Turbocharging,” MTZ 07-08/2011, Vol. 72.
- Jono, M., Taguchi, M., Shonohara, T., and Narihiro, S., “Development of a New 2.0L I4 Turbocharged Gasoline Direct Injection Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1017, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-1017.
- Bunce, M. and Blaxill, H., “Sub-200 g/kWh BSFC on a Light Duty Gasoline Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0709, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0709.
- Bunce, M., Blaxill, H., Kulatilaka, W., and Jiang, N., “The Effects of Turbulent Jet Characteristics on Engine Performance Using a Pre-Chamber Combustor,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1195, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1195.
- Partridge, R., Weissman, W., Ueda, T., Iwashita, Y. et al., “Onboard Gasoline Separation for Improved Vehicle Efficiency,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 7(2):366-378, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1200.
- Kato. H. Kuzoka K., Kato Y., Chishina H. et al., Research on Engine System Making Effective Use of Bio-Ethanol-Blended Fuels, in JSAE Annual Congress, May 24, 2013
- Kuzuoka, K., Kurotani, T., Chishima, H., and Kudo, H., “Study of High-Compression-Ratio Engine Combined with an Ethanol-Gasoline Fuel Separation System,” SAE Int. J. Engines 7(4):1773-1780, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2614.
- Mizuno, K., Chishima, H., Zhou, J., Carpenter, B. et al., “Study of Alcohol-Gasoline Separation Technology to Suppress Knock and Enable Higher Efficiency Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0882, 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-0882.
- Bromberg, L. and Blumberg, P., “Estimates of DI Hydrous Ethanol Utilization for Knock Avoidance and Comparison to a Measured and Simulated DI E85 Baseline,” MIT Plasma Science and Fusion Center Report PSFC JA-09-33, http://library.psfc.mit.edu/catalog/reports/2000/09ja/09ja033/09ja033_abs.html.
- Berni, F., Breda, S., D’Adamo, A. et al., “Numerical Investigation on the Effects of Water/Methanol Injection as Knock Suppressor to Increase the Fuel Efficiency of a Highly Downsized GDI Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-24-2499, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-24-2499.
- Boehm, M., Maehrle, W., Bartelt, H.-C. et al., “Functional Integration of Water Injection into the Gasoline Engine,” MTZ 77(01):36-40, 2016.
- Boehm, M., Durst, B., Unterweger, G. et al., “Approaches for On-Board Water Provision for Water Injection,” ATZ 118(01):54-57, 2016.
- Tartakovsky, L. and Sheintuch, M., “Fuel Reforming in Internal Combustion Engines,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 67:88-114, 2018.
- Poran, A. and Tartakovsky, L., “Influence of Methanol Reformate Injection Strategy on Performance, Available Exhaust Gas Enthalpy and Emissions of a Direct-Injection Spark Ignition Engine,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 42(23):15652-15668, 2017.