This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Steady-State, Transient and WLTC Drive-Cycle Experimental Performance Comparison between Single-Scroll and Twin-Scroll Turbocharger Turbine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 02, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The use of twin-scroll turbocharger turbine in automotive powertrain has been known for providing better transient performance over conventional single-scroll turbine. This has been accredited to the preservation of exhaust flow energy in the twin-scroll volute. In the current study, the performance comparison between a single and twin-scroll turbine has been made experimentally on a 1.5L passenger car gasoline engine. The uniqueness of the current study is that nearly identical engine hardware has been used for both the single and twin-scroll turbine volutes. This includes the intake and exhaust manifold geometry, turbocharger compressor, turbine rotor and volute scroll A/R variation trend over circumferential location. On top of that, the steady-state engine performance with both the volutes, has also been tuned to have matching brake torque. Such highly comparable setup enabled a more precise evaluation on the effect of pulse-isolation in the twin-scroll turbine volute during transient process. The steady-state performance comparison shows the amplitude of exhaust pulse in the twin-scroll volute is substantially higher than in the single-scroll volute, hence confirming the preservation of pulse exhaust energy. As a result, twin-scroll volute is found to be able to accelerate the engine boost pressure at a faster rate, therefore results in better transient response. The ultimate advantage of the twin-scroll turbine is further exemplified via engine Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle (WLTC) testing, where approximately 2.7% of averaged reduction in fuel consumption has been recorded. Majority of this improvement has been contributed by low to medium speed driving condition.
- Meng Soon Chiong - Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
- Mohd Azman Abas - Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
- Feng Xian Tan - Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
- Srithar Rajoo - Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
- Ricardo Martinez-Botas - Imperial College London
- Yutaka Fujita - Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
- Takao Yokoyama - Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
- Seiichi Ibaraki - Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
- Motoki Ebisu - Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Engine & Turbochargers
CitationChiong, M., Abas, M., Tan, F., Rajoo, S. et al., "Steady-State, Transient and WLTC Drive-Cycle Experimental Performance Comparison between Single-Scroll and Twin-Scroll Turbocharger Turbine," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0327, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0327.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- Raftery, T., “Seven Reasons Why the Internal Combustion Engine Is a Dead Man Walking,” 2018, https://www.forbes.com/sites/sap/2018/09/06/seven-reasons-why-the-internal-combustion-engine-is-a-dead-man-walking-updated/#583b1e9a603f, last accessed Oct. 5, 2018.
- Pagot, A., Duparchy, A., Gautrot, X., Leduc, P. et al., “Combustion Approach for Downsizing: the IFP Concept,” Oil & Gas Science and Technology - Rev. IFP. 61(1):139-153, 2006.
- Grigoriadis, P., Böttcher, L., Binder, E., and Sens, M., “Advanced Boosting Technologies for Future SI Engine Concepts” in 11th International Conference on Turbochargers and Turbocharging, 2014, doi:10.1533/978081000342.41.
- Pratte, D., “Twin-Scroll Turbocharging: Still the New Hotness,” 2014, http://speed.academy/twin-scroll-turbocharging-still-the-new-hotness/, last assessed Oct. 13, 2018.
- Ebisu, M., Terakawa, Y., and Ibaraki, S., “Mitsubishi Turbocharger for Lower Pollution Cars,” Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review 41(1):1-3, 2004.
- Walkingshaw, J., Iosifidis, G., Scheuermann, T., Filsinger, D. et al., “A Comparison of a Mono, Twin and Double Scroll Turbine for Automotive Applications,” in Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, Paper GT2015-43240, 2015.
- Romagnoli, A., Copeland, C., Martinez-Botas, R.F., Rajoo, S. et al., “Comparison between the Steady Performance of Double-Entry and Twin-Entry Turbocharger Turbine,” Journal of Turbomachinery 135:011042-1-011042-1, 2013.
- Pischinger, F. and Wünsche, A., “The Characteristic Behavior of Radial Turbines and Its Influence on Turbocharging Process,” in Proceedings of the 1977 CIMAC Congress, 1977.
- Chiong, M.S., Rajoo, S., Romagnoli, A., Costall, A.W. et al., “One-Dimensional Pulse-Flow Modeling of a Twin-Scroll Turbine,” Energy 115:1291-1304, 2016.
- British Standards Institution, “Measurement of Fluid Flow in Closed Conduits. Part 1: Pressure Differential Devices,” Standard, 1981.
- Szymko, S., Martinez-Botas, R.F., and Pullen, K.R., “Experimental Evaluation of Turbocharger Turbine Performance under Pulsating Flow Conditions,” in Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo 2005: Power for Land, Sea and Air, Paper GT2005-68878, 2005.
- Rajoo, S. and Martinez-Botas, R.F., “Variable Geometry Mixed Flow Turbine for Turbochargers: An Experimental Study,” International Journal of Fluid Machinery and Systems 1(1):155-168, 2008.
- Tutuianu, M., Marotta, A., Steven, H., Ericsson, E. et al., “Development of a World-Wide Worldwide Harmonized Light Duty Driving Test Cycle (WLTC),” Technical Report UN/ECE/WP.29/GPRE/WLTP-IG DHC Subgroup, 2013.