This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Evaluation of Gasoline Additive Packages to Assess Their Ability to Clean Up Intake Valve Deposits in Automotive Engines
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 2, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The majority of passenger car and light-duty trucks, especially in North America, operate using port-fuel injection (PFI) engines. In PFI engines, the fuel is injected onto the intake valves and then pulled into the combustion chamber during the intake stroke. Components of the fuel are unstable in this environment and form deposits on the upstream face of the intake valve. These deposits have been found to affect a vehicle’s drivability, emissions and engine performance. Therefore, it is critical for the gasoline to be blended with additives containing detergents capable of removing the harmful intake valve deposits (IVDs).
Established standards are available to measure the propensity of IVD formation, for example the ASTM D6201 engine test and ASTM D5500 vehicle test. However, rigorous testing conducted in a modern fleet of vehicles in a statistically robust design can provide greater insight into the actual performance of modern PFI engines with available gasoline additive packages. In this study, an optimized mileage accumulation protocol was used to assess the performance of new experimental gasoline additive packages in removing the IVDs in a fleet of vehicles typical of engines and vehicles available in the North American vehicle parc. The performance of a gasoline additive package, both at lower and higher additive treat-rates, was compared to that of a commercial additive package at EPA-approved lowest additive concentration (LAC).
Based on three decades of expertise, the testing protocol was optimized to use fewer vehicles and shorter mileage accumulation than previously required for the same statistical confidence. It was observed that the tested experimental gasoline additive packages demonstrated a statistically higher cleanup at both treat-rates compared to the commercial LAC additive package. This rigorous statistically-robust test protocol can be used to assess candidate fuel additive packages for the North American gasoline market.
- Vivek Raja Raj Mohan - Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc.
- Edward Nelson - Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc.
- Jannik Reitz - Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc.
- Jennifer Kensler - Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc.
- Varun Gauba - Shell Global Solutions (US) Inc.
- Matthew Hinojosa - Southwest Research Institute
- Brent Shoffner - Southwest Research Institute
CitationRaj Mohan, V., Nelson, E., Reitz, J., Kensler, J. et al., "Evaluation of Gasoline Additive Packages to Assess Their Ability to Clean Up Intake Valve Deposits in Automotive Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0261, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0261.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
- Arnault, N. and Bonne, Samuel., “Engine Lube-Oil Consumption Stakes and Benefits from Significant Blow-by Oil Mist Reduction,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1617, 2012, doi: 10.4271/2012-01-1617.
- Woodyard, M., “Gasoline Additive and Deposit Effects on the Road and a Ford 2.3L Engine Test,” SAE Technical Paper 952446, 1995, doi:10.4271/952446.
- Price, R., Martin, D., Dickens, N., and Bohr, P., “The Impact of Inlet Valve Deposits on PFI Gasoline SI Engines - Quantified Effects on Fuel Consumption,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0004, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0004.
- Ramadhas, A., Singh, V., Subramanian, M., Acharya, G. et al., “Impact of Fuel Additives on Intake Valve Deposits, Combustion Chamber Deposits and Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1980, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-1980.
- Glawar, A.F.G., Volkmer, F., Ziman, P.R., Groves, A.P. et al., “Engine Cleanliness in an Industry Standard Mercedes-Benz M111 Bench Engine: Effects of Inlet Valve Deposits on Combustion,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2239, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-2239.
- Glawar, A.F.G., Natarajan, V., Ziman, P.R., Groves, A.P. et al., “Understanding the Adverse Effects of Inlet Valve Deposits on SI Engine Operation, through a Novel Technique to Create Surrogate Deposits,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1742, 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-1742.
- Graham, J. and Evans, B., “Effects of Intake Valve Deposits on Driveability,” SAE Technical Paper 922220, 1992, doi:10.4271/922220.
- Costa, J., Sarkisov, L., Seaton, N., and Cracknell, R., “Adsorption-Based Structural Characterization of Intake Valve Deposits,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-0901, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-0901.
- Shibata, G., Nagaishi, H., and Oda, K., “Effect of Intake Valve Deposits and Gasoline Composition on S.I. Engine Performance,” SAE Technical Paper 922263, 1992, doi:10.4271/922263.
- Houser, K. and Crosby, T., “The Impact of Intake Valve Deposits on Exhaust Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 922259, 1992, doi:10.4271/922259.
- Spink, C., Coleman, A., Nelson, E., Wakefield, S. et al., “Multi-Vehicle Evaluation of Gasoline Additive Packages: A Fourth Generation Protocol for the Assessment of Intake System Deposit Removal,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2(2):27-37, 2010, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2635.
- ASTM D5500-16, “Standard Test Method for Vehicle Evaluation of Unleaded Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel for Intake Valve Deposit Formation,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2016, www.astm.org.
- ASTM D6201-18, “Standard Test Method for Dynamometer Evaluation of Unleaded Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel for Intake Valve Deposit Formation,” ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2018, www.astm.org.
- Gail, S., Nomura, T., Hayashi, H., Miura, Y. et al., “An Intake Valve Deposit (IVD) Engine Test Development to Investigate Deposit Build-Up Mechanism Using a Real Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 10(3), 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-2291.
- Spink, C., Cantlay, A., Ziman, P., Luebbers, M. et al., “A New Protocol for the Road Test Evaluation of Gasoline Additive Packages,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-3408, 2006, doi:10.4271/2006-01-3408.
- American Automobile Association Inc., “AAA Fuel Quality Research: Proprietary Research into the Effectiveness of Fuel Additive Packages in Commercially-Available Gasoline,” AAA Report, NewsRoom.AAA.com, 2016.
- IHS Markit, “Vehicles Getting Older: Average Age of Light Cars and Trucks in U.S. Rises Again in 2016 to 11.6 years, IHS Markit Says,” ihsmarkit.com. https://news.ihsmarkit.com/press-release/automotive/vehicles-getting-older-average-age-light-cars-and-trucks-us-rises-again-201, accessed Oct. 16, 2018.
- Bureau of Transportation Statistics, “Average Age of Automobiles and Trucks in Operation in the United States,” United States Department of Transportation, https://www.bts.gov/content/average-age-automobiles-and-trucks-operation-united-states, accessed Oct. 16, 2018.