This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Isobaric Combustion: A Potential Path to High Efficiency, in Combination with the Double Compression Expansion Engine (DCEE) Concept
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published January 15, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The efficiency of an internal combustion engine is highly dependent on the peak pressure at which the engine operates. A new compound engine concept, the double compression expansion engine (DCEE), utilizes a two-stage compression and expansion cycle to reach ultrahigh efficiencies. This engine takes advantage of its high-integrity structure, which is adapted to high pressures, and the peak motored pressure reaches up to 300 bar. However, this makes the use of conventional combustion cycles, such as the Seiliger-Sabathe (mixed) or Otto (isochoric) cycles, not feasible as they involve a further pressure rise due to combustion. This study investigates the concept of isobaric combustion at relatively high peak pressures and compares this concept with traditional diesel combustion cycles in terms of efficiency and emissions. Multiple consecutive injections through a single injector are used for controlling the heat release rate profile to achieve isobaric heat addition. In this study, the intake pressure is varied to enable a comparison between the isobaric cases with different peak pressures, up to 150 bar, and the mixed cycle cases. Tests are performed at several different levels of EGR. The experiments are performed on a 12.8 L displacement 6-cylinder Volvo D13C500 engine utilizing a single cylinder with a standard 17-compression-ratio piston. In this study, the cylinder represents the high-pressure unit of the DCEE. The fuel used in all the experiments is a standard EU diesel. In each target condition, the different injection strategies are compared with the total amount of fuel kept relatively constant. The results prove that the isobaric combustion concept is feasible with a traditional injection system and can achieve gross indicated efficiencies close to or higher than those of a conventional diesel combustion cycle. Moreover, the results show that with an isobaric cycle, heat transfer losses can be reduced by over 20%. However, the exhaust energy is higher, which can eventually be recovered in the second stage of expansion. Thus, this cycle could be suitable for the DCEE concept. The CO, UHC and soot emission levels are proven to be fairly similar to those of the conventional diesel combustion. However, the NOx emissions are significantly lower for the isobaric combustion.
CitationBabayev, R., Ben Houidi, M., Andersson, A., and Johansson, B., "Isobaric Combustion: A Potential Path to High Efficiency, in Combination with the Double Compression Expansion Engine (DCEE) Concept," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0085, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0085.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
- Allen, M.R., Barros, V.R., Broome, J., Cramer, W. et al. , “IPCC Fifth Assessment Synthesis Report-Climate Change 2014 Synthesis Report,” (2014).
- European Commission , “Strategy for Reducing Heavy-Duty Vehicles’ Fuel Consumption and CO2 Emissions, 2014, http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/heavy/docs/com_285_2014_en.pdf.
- ExxonMobil , “The Outlook for Energy: A View to 2040,” 2016.
- Muncrief, R. and Sharpe, B. , “Overview of the Heavy-Duty Vehicle Market and CO2 Emissions in the European Union,” International Council on Clean Transportation Working Paper, Dec. 2015, 1-14.
- Phillips, F., Gilbert, I., Pirault, J.-P., and Megel, M. , “Scuderi Split Cycle Research Engine: Overview, Architecture and Operation,” SAE Int. J. Engines 4(1):450-466, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-0403.
- Clarke, J. and O’Malley, E. , “Analytical Comparison of a Turbocharged Conventional Diesel and a Naturally Aspirated Compact Compression Ignition Engine both Sized for a Highway Truck,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1736, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1736.
- Lam, N., Tuner, M., Tunestal, P., Andersson, A. et al. , “Double Compression Expansion Engine Concepts: A Path to High Efficiency,” SAE Int. J. Engines 8(4):1562-1578, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1260.
- Lam, N., Andersson, A., and Tunestal, P. , “Double Compression Expansion Engine Concepts: Efficiency Analysis over a Load Range,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0886, 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-0886.
- Bhavani Shankar, V., Lam, N., Andersson, A., and Johansson, B. , “Optimum Heat Release Rates for a Double Compression Expansion (DCEE) Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0636, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0636.
- Shankar, B., Shankar, V., Johansson, B., and Andersson, A. , “Double Compression Expansion Engine: A Parametric Study on a High-Efficiency Engine Concept,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0890, 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-0890.
- Okamoto, T. and Uchida, N. , “New Concept for Overcoming the Trade-Off between Thermal Efficiency, Each Loss and Exhaust Emissions in a Heavy Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines 9(2):859-867, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0729.
- Heywood, J.B. , Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals (1988).
- Johansson, B. , “Combustion Engines,” Department of Energy Sciences, Lund University, 2014.
- Dernotte, J., Dec, J., and Ji, C. , “Energy Distribution Analysis in Boosted HCCI-Like/LTGC Engines - Understanding the Trade Offs to Maximize the Thermal Efficiency,” SAE Int. J. Engines 8(3):956-980, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0824.
- Manente, V., Johansson, B., Tunestal, P., and Cannella, W. , “Effects of Different Type of Gasoline Fuels on Heavy Duty Partially Premixed Combustion,” SAE Int. J. Engines 2(2):71-88, 2010, doi:10.4271/2009- 01-2668.
- O’Connor, J. and Musculus, M. , “Post Injections for Soot Reduction in Diesel Engines: A Review of Current Understanding,” SAE Int. J. Engines 6(1):400-421, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0917.
- Ladommatos, N., Abdelhalim, S., Zhao, H., and Hu, Z. , “The Dilution, Chemical, and Thermal Effects of Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Diesel Engine Emissions - Part 3: Effects of Water Vapour,” SAE Technical Paper 971659, 1997, doi:10.4271/971659.
- Jacobs, T., Assanis, D., and Filipi, Z. , “The Impact of Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Performance and Emissions of a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1068, 2003, doi:10.4271/2003-01-1068.
- Meek, G., Williams, R., Thornton, D., Knapp, P. et al. , “F2E - Ultra High Pressure Distributed Pump Common Rail System,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1440, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1440.
- Nehmer, D. and Reitz, R. , “Measurement of the Effect of Injection Rate and Split Injections on Diesel Engine Soot and NOx Emissions,” SAE Technical Paper 940668, 1994, doi:10.4271/940668.
- Han, Z., Uludogan, A., Hampson, G., and Reitz, R. , “Mechanism of Soot and NOx Emission Reduction Using Multiple-Injection in a Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 960633, 1996, doi:10.4271/960633.
- Colban, W., Miles, P., and Oh, S. , “Effect of Intake Pressure on Performance and Emissions in an Automotive Diesel Engine Operating in Low Temperature Combustion Regimes,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-4063, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-4063.
- Koci, C., Ra, Y., Krieger, R., Andrie, M. et al. , “Multiple-Event Fuel Injection Investigations in a Highly-Dilute Diesel Low Temperature Combustion Regime,” SAE Int. J. Engines 2(1):837-857, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-0925.