This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Simulation of System Brake Efficiency in a Double Compression-Expansion Engine-Concept (DCEE) Based on Experimental Combustion Data
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published January 15, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The double compression-expansion engine concepts (DCEE) are split-cycle concepts where the compression, combustion, expansion and gas exchange strokes occur in two or more different cylinders. Previous simulation studies reveal there is a potential to improve brake efficiency with these engine concepts due to improved thermodynamic and mechanical efficiencies. As a continuation of this project this paper studies an alternative layout of the DCEE-concept. The concept studied in this paper has three different cylinders, a compression, a combustion and an expansion cylinder. Overall system indicated and brake efficiency estimations were based on both engine experiments and simulations. The engine experiments were carried out at 10 different operating points and 5 fuelling rates (between 98.2 and 310.4 mg/cycle injection mass) at an engine speed of 1200 rpm. The inlet manifold pressure was varied between 3 and 5 bar. Due to concerns with structural stability the peak cylinder pressure during the engine experiments was limited to 210 bar. Exhaust backpressure was limited to 8 bar due to thermal stress on the exhaust valves. The engine experiments reveal that a gross indicated efficiency (GIE) of 47 % is achieved at most of the operating points. There were cases where GIE was below 45 % due to high heat loss and degraded combustion efficiency.
The data obtained from the engine experiments were then used as input into the full DCEE-engine simulations. System brake efficiency was determined by estimating friction loss in the simulations. These simulations and friction estimations suggests a system brake efficiency of 41.8 % at the lowest fuelling rate (98.2 mg/cycle) is achieved. Increasing engine load improves efficiency due to lower relative intercooling loss and improved mechanical efficiency. A peak system brake efficiency of 52.8 % is achieved at a very high injection mass (275.6 mg/cycle) and 5 bar Pinlet setting. A further increase in injection mass to 310.4 mg/cycle results in a high increase in heat loss which causes system brake efficiency to decrease to 49.9 %.
CitationLam, N., Tunestal, P., and Andersson, A., "Simulation of System Brake Efficiency in a Double Compression-Expansion Engine-Concept (DCEE) Based on Experimental Combustion Data," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0073, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0073.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
- Lam, N., Tuner, M., Tunestal, P., Andersson, A. et al. , “Double Compression Expansion Engine Concepts: A Path to High Efficiency,” SAE Int. J. Engines 8(4):1562-1578, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1260.
- Lam, N., Andersson, A., and Tunestal, P. , “Double Compression Expansion Engine Concepts: Efficiency Analysis over a Load Range,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0886, 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-0886.
- Cummins, C.L. , Diesel’s Engine: From Conception to 1918, 185, doi:9780917308031.
- Clarke, J. and O'Malley, E. , “Analytical Comparison of a Turbocharged Conventional Diesel and a Naturally Aspirated Compact Compression Ignition Engine both Sized for a Highway Truck,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-1736, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1736.
- Morgan, R.E., Jackson, N., Atkins, A., dong, G. et al. , “The Recuperated Split Cycle - Experimental Combustion Data from a Single Cylinder Test Rig,” SAE Int. J. Engines 10(5):2596-2605, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-24-0169.
- Ailloud, C., Delaporte, B., Schmitz, G., Keromnes, A. et al. , “Development and Validation of a Five Stroke Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-24-0095, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-24-0095.
- Melin, A., Kittelson, D., and Northrop, W. , “Parametric 1-D Modeling Study of a 5-Stroke Spark-Ignition Engine Concept for Increasing Engine Thermal Efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1752, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1752.
- Branyon, D. and Simpson, D. , “Miller Cycle Application to the Scuderi Split Cycle Engine (by Downsizing the Compressor Cylinder),” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0419, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0419.
- Goussard, J.O. and Roulet, B. , “Free Expansion for Real Gases,” American Journal of Physics 61(9):845-848, 1993, doi:10.1119/1.17417.
- Heywood, J.B. , Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals (McGraw-Hill), 510, doi:0-07-100499-8.
- Gamma Technologies , GT-ISE v.2016.
- Lam, N., Tunestal, P., and Andersson, A. , “Analyzing Factors Affecting Gross Indicated Efficiency When Inlet Temperature Is Changed,” SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1780, 2018, doi:10.4271/2018-01-1780.
- Chen, S.K. and Flynn, P.F. , “Development of a Single Cylinder Compression Ignition Research Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 650733, 1965, doi:10.4271/650733.
- Noble, A. and Such, C. , “Ways to Reduce CO2 Emissions from On-Hiwghway, Heavy Duty Diesel Engines,” in Transport Research Arena, Paris, 2014.
- Megel, M., Westmoreland, B., Jones, G., Phillips, F. et al. , “Development of a Structurally Optimized Heavy Duty Diesel Cylinder Head Design Capable of 250 Bar Peak Cylinder Pressure Operation,” SAE Int. J. Engines 4(3):2736-2755, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-2232.
- Crabb, D., Fleiss, M., Larsson, J.-E., and Somhorst, J. , “New Modular Engine Platform from Volvo,” MTZ, 2013.
- Metzner, F.T., Becker, N., Demmelbauer-Ebner, W., Müller, R., et al. , “Der neue 6-l-W 12-Motor im Audi A8,” MTZ, edition 4, Apr. 2004.