This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Characterization of GDI PM during Vehicle Start-Stop Operation
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published January 15, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
As the fuel economy regulations increase in stringency, many manufacturers are implementing start-stop operation to enhance vehicle fuel economy. During start-stop operation, the engine shuts off when the vehicle is stationary for more than a few seconds. When the brake is released by the driver, the engine restarts. Depending on traffic conditions, start-stop operation can result in fuel savings from a few percent to close to 10%. Gasoline direct injection (GDI) engines are also increasingly available on light-duty vehicles. While GDI engines offer fuel economy advantages over port fuel injected (PFI) engines, they also tend to have higher PM emissions, particularly during start-up transients. Thus, there is interest in evaluating the effect of start-stop operation on PM emissions. In this study, a 2.5L GDI vehicle was operated over the FTP75 drive cycle. Runs containing cold starts (FTP-75 cycle Phases 1 & 2) and multiple runs containing hot starts (FTP-75 cycle Phases 3 & 4) were performed each day. Note that the FTP-75 Phases 3 & 4 are identical to Phases 1 & 2 except that the engine is warmed up. Three fuels were evaluated: an 87 AKI gasoline (E0), a 21% splash blend of ethanol and the 87 AKI gasoline (E21), and a 12% splash blend of iso-butanol and the 87 AKI gasoline (iBu12). PM mass, transient particle number concentration and size distribution, and soot mass concentration were evaluated for both start-stop operation and no start-stop operation on each fuel. Three Phase 1 & 2 cycles and as many as 27 Phase 3 & 4 cycles were performed for each fuel-mode combination. Composite FTP mass emissions for E0 and iBu12 showed increased total PM emissions with start-stop operation, but E21 showed no difference. Statistical analysis of the effects of start-stop on PM number and soot emissions showed different trends for different fuels. For example, when E0 is used with start-stop operation, the particle number decreased but the soot mass tended to increase. The results of this study have implications for hybrid vehicle operation as well because the internal combustion engine in hybrid vehicles must stop and re-start during normal operation.
CitationStorey, J., Moses-DeBusk, M., Huff, S., Thomas, J. et al., "Characterization of GDI PM during Vehicle Start-Stop Operation," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0050, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0050.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
- Conger, M. and Holmen, B.A. , “Characterization of Real-World Particle Number Emissions during Reignition Events from a 2010 Light-Duty Hybrid Electric Vehicle,” Transportation Research Record 2503:137-146, 2015, doi:10.3141/2503-15.
- Storey, J.M., Barone, T., Norman, K., and Lewis, S. , “Ethanol Blend Effects on Direct Injection Spark- Ignition Gasoline Vehicle Particulate Matter Emissions,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 3(2):650-659, 2010, doi:10.4271/2010-01-2129.
- Storey, J., Barone, T., Thomas, J., and Huff, S. , “Exhaust Particle Characterization for Lean and Stoichiometric DI Vehicles Operating on Ethanol-Gasoline Blends,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-0437, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0437.
- Koczak, J., Boehman, A., and Brusstar, M. , “Particulate Emissions in GDI Vehicle Transients: An Examination of FTP, HWFET, and US06 Measurements,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0992, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0992.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency , “Partial Grant of Clean Air Act Waiver Application Submitted by Growth Energy to Increase the Allowable Ethanol Content of Gasoline to 15 Percent; Decision of the Administrator,” 76(17):4662-4683, 2011.
- Jung, H., Shelby, M., Newman, C., and Stein, R. , “Effect of Ethanol on Part Load Thermal Efficiency and CO2 Emissions of SI Engines,” SAE Int. J. Engines 6(1):456-469, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1634.
- Storey, J.M.E., Lewis, S.A., Szybist, J.P., Thomas, J.F. et al. , “Novel Characterization of GDI Engine Exhaust for Gasoline and Mid-Level Gasoline-Alcohol Blends,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 7(2):1-8, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1606.