This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Optical Investigation on the Combustion Process Differences between Double-Pilot and Closely-Coupled Triple-Pilot Injection Strategies in a LD Diesel Engine
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published January 15, 2019 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The combustion processes of three injection strategies in a light-duty (LD) diesel engine at a medium load point are captured with a high speed video camera. A double-pilot/main/single-post injection strategy representative of a LD Euro 6 calibration is considered as the reference. There is a modest temporal spacing (dwell) after the first pilot (P1) and second pilot (P2). A second strategy, “A,” adds a third pilot (P3). The dwell after both P2 and P3 are several times shorter than in the reference strategy. A third strategy, “B,” further reduces all dwells. Each injection has its own associated local peak in the heat release rate (HRR) following some ignition delay. Between these peaks lie local minima, or dips. In all three cases, the fuel from P1 combusts as a propagating premixed flame. For all strategies, the ignition of P2 primarily occurs at its interface with the existing combustion regions. Extinguishing of the prevailing combustion by the fuel jets of later injections is noted in all strategies. This phenomenon is confirmed by comparing the timing of each fuel injection with the dips in the HRR and spatial luminescence over time. These dips after each injection are larger than would be expected by the cooling effect of the injected fuel alone. Furthermore, not all dips in the HRR are the result of this extinguishing, and it would not have been possible to determine if the dips are due to this extinguishing or a simple exhaustion of available fuel without this optical investigation. Even if the precise hydraulic injection timing can be known, knowledge of the spatial relationship of the injected fuel and prevailing combustion is necessary.
CitationDenny, M., Matamis, A., Wang, Z., Persson, H. et al., "Optical Investigation on the Combustion Process Differences between Double-Pilot and Closely-Coupled Triple-Pilot Injection Strategies in a LD Diesel Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2019-01-0022, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4271/2019-01-0022.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
- Hagen, J., Herrmann, O.E., Weber, J., and Queck, D. , “Diesel Combustion Potentials by Further Injector Improvement,” MTZ, 2016.
- Zeh, D., Hammer, J., Uhr, C., Rückle, M. et al. , “Bosch Diesel Injection Technology - Response for Every Vehicle Class Production,” in 23rd Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology, 2014, 757-772.
- Schöppe, D., Atzler, F., Kastner, O., and Kapphan, F. , “High Performance Diesel Direct Driven Piezo Common Rail Injection System,” in 23rd Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology, Aachen, 2014, 773-790.
- Persson, H., Babajimopoulos, A., Helmantel, A., Holst, F. et al. , “Development of the Combustion System for Volvo Cars Euro6d VEA Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0713, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0713.
- Busch, S., Zha, K., Miles, P.C., Warey, A. et al. , “Experimental and Numerical Investigations of Close-Coupled Pilot Injections to Reduce Combustion Noise in a Small-Bore Diesel Engine,” SAE Int. J. Engines 8(2):660-678, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0796.
- Denny, M., Holst, F., Helmantel, A., Persson, H. et al. , “Impact of Closely-Coupled Triple-Pilot and Conventional Double-Pilot Injection Strategies in a LD Diesel Engine,” Fuel, 2018, manuscript submitted.
- Beatrice, C., Belardini, P., Bertoli, C., Lisbona, M.G. et al. , “Combustion Process Management in Common Rail DI Diesel Engines by Multiple Injection,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-24-0007, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-24-0007.
- Husberg, T., Denbratt, I., and Karlsson, A. , “Analysis of Advanced Multiple Injection Strategies in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Using Optical Measurements and CFD-Simulations,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1328, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-1328.
- Mendez, S. and Thirouard, B. , “Using Multiple Injection Strategies in Diesel Combustion: Potential to Improve Emissions, Noise and Fuel Economy Trade-Off in Low CR Engines,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 1(1):662-674, 2009, doi:10.4271/2008-01-1329.
- Brands, T., Huelser, T., Hottenbach, P., Koss, H.J. et al. , “Optical Investigation of Combusting Split-Injection Diesel Sprays Under Quiescent Conditions,” SAE Int. J. Engines 6(3):1626-1641, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-24-0034.
- Park, C. and Busch, S. , “The Influence of Pilot Injection on High-Temperature Ignition Processes and Early Flame Structure in a High-Speed Direct Injection Diesel Engine,” International Journal of Engine Research, 2017, doi:10.1177/1468087417728630.
- Möller, N., Fleiss, M., Rengmyr, S., and Somhorst, J. , “VEA - the New Engine Architecture from Volvo,” MTZ, Sept. 2013, doi:10.1007/978-3-658-05016-0_4.
- Hultqvist, A., Christensen, M., Johansson, B., Richter, M. et al. , “The HCCI Combustion Process in a Single Cycle - Speed Fuel Tracer LIF and Chemiluminescence Imaging,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0424, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-0424.
- Sun, J.H. , “Evaluation of the Intensity of Turbulent Velocities by Using a Cross-Correlation Technique for Pattern Tracking,” SAE Technical Paper 960267, 1996, doi:10.4271/960267.