This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Using Social Network Analysis to Quantify Interoperability and Versatility in the U.S. Air Force Network of Systems
Technical Paper
2018-01-6000
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
The Department of Defense (DoD) faces a similar challenge to the broader aerospace community in that they must integrate and operate a range of systems developed independently over a long period. It has proved difficult for the DoD to manage this network of systems and they must explore other options for analyzing and managing their systems. This paper explores the application of social network analysis tools and metrics to a network of aerospace systems within the U.S. Air Force. The structure of the network includes over one hundred U.S. Air Force systems including, aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, munitions, satellites, and command and control systems. The paper describes two separate networks based on direct connections and shared activities between these systems. For each of these networks measures of centrality, degree, closeness, betweenness, and eigenvector, quantify both the interoperability and versatility of the U.S. Air Force systems. These metrics appear to provide valuable insight into the network of systems and the results of the analysis align with general perceptions of the most interoperable and versatile DoD systems. In the interoperability network, the GPS III system, that provides information to nearly every other DoD system, ranked highest among the Air Force Systems. Also, in the versatility network, the A-10 and B-52, very versatile aircraft, scored very well based on the social network analysis metrics. Overall, social network analysis tools and metrics have the potential to provide systems engineers with valuable insights into the analysis, management, and design of systems. Although the initial results appear to be promising, future work should focus on validating the approach of applying social network analysis metrics to networks of systems and expand the work beyond the DoD realm to include other networks of systems.
Recommended Content
Aerospace Standard | Digital Fiber Optic Link Loss Budget Methodology for Aerospace Platforms |
Aerospace Standard | Guidelines for Design of Digital Fiber Optic Link Loss Budget Methodology |
Technical Paper | Development and Applications of MIL-STD-1553 |
Authors
Topic
Citation
Enos, J. and Nilchiani, R., "Using Social Network Analysis to Quantify Interoperability and Versatility in the U.S. Air Force Network of Systems," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-6000, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-6000.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 5 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 6 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 7 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 8 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 9 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 10 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 11 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 12 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 13 |
Also In
References
- Owens , W.A. National Defense University Strategi Forum 1996 1 6
- Dahmann , J. and Baldwin , K. Understanding the Current State of US Defense Systems of Systems and the Implications for Systems Engineering Systems Conference Montreal, Canada 2008
- Government Accountability Office 2015
- Joint Chiefs of Staff 2012
- U.S. Air Force Fact Sheets http://www.af.mil/AboutUs/FactSheets 2017
- Church , A.M. Air Force Magazine 80 103 2015
- Golbeck , J. Analyzing the Social Web Boston, MA Morgan Kaufmann 2013 9780124055315
- Everton , S. Disrupting Dark Networks New York Cambridge University Press 2012 9781139136877
- INCOSE Systems Engineering Handbook: A Guide for System Life Cycle Processes and Activities Hoboken, NJ John Wiley & Sons, Inc 2015 9781118999400
- Kossiakoff , A. , Sweet , W. , Seymour , S. , and Biemer , S. Systems Engineering Principles and Practice Second Hoboken, NJ Wiley 2011 978-0470405482
- Buede , D. The Engineering Design of Systems: Models and Methods New York Wiley 2000 978-0470164020
- McManus , H. , Richards , M. , Ross , A. , and Hastings , D. A Framework for Incorporating “Ilities” in Tradespace Studies AIAA SPACE 2007 Conference & Exposition Long Beach, CA 2009
- de Weck , O. , Ross , A. , and Rhodes , D. Investigating Relationships and Semantic Sets amongst System Lifecycle Properties (Ilities) Third International Engineering Systems Symposium Delft, the Netherlands 2012
- Department of Defense Defense Acquisition Guidebook Washington, DC Department of Defense 2013
- ESD Symposium Committee 2002
- Rouse , W. Complex Engineered, Organizational and Natural Systems Systems Engineering 10 3 260 271 2007 10.1002/sys.20076
- Crawley , E. , de Weck , O. , Eppinger , S. , Magee , C. et al. The Influence of Architecture in Engineering Systems Cambridge, MA Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2004
- Maier , M.W. and Rechtin , E. The Art of Systems Architecting Second New York CRC Press 2002 978-1580533782
- Architecture Frameworks Working Group 2009
- Ring , S. , Nicholson , D. , Thilenius , J. , and Harris , S. 2004
- Enos , J. Synthesizing DoDAF Architectures to Develop the Joint Capability Enterprise Architecture Systems Engineering D.C. 1 6 Washington, DC 2014
- Sage , A. and Cuppan , C. On the Systems Engineering and Management of Systems Systems Management 2 4 325 345 2001
- Keating , C. , Rogers , R. , Unal , R. , Dryer , D. et al. Systems of Systems Engineering Engineering Management Journal 15 3 36 45 2003 10.1080/10429247.2003.11415214
- Maier , M.W. Architecting Principles for Systems-of-Systems Systems Engineering 1 4 267 284 1998 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6858(1998)1:4<267::AID-SYS3>3.0.CO;2-D
- Boardman , J. and Sauser , B. System of Systems - The Meaning of Of 2006 IEEE/SMC International Conference on System of Systems Engineering Los Angeles, CA 2006
- Clark , J. System of Systems Engineering and Family of Systems Engineering from a Standards Perspective IEEE International Conference of Systems of Systems Engineering Monterey, CA 2008
- Director, Systems and Software Engineering 2008
- Chattopadhyay , D. , Ross , A. , and Rhodes , D. A Practical Method for Tradespace Exploration of Systems of System AIAA Space 2009 Pasadena, CA 2009
- Uday , P. and Marais , K. Designing Resilient Systems-of-Systems: A Survey of Metrics, Methods, and Challenges Systems Engineering 18 491 510 2015 10.1002/sys.21325
- Serrat , O. 2010
- Freeman , L. The Development of Social Network Analysis Vancouver, BC Empirical Press 2004 978-1594577147
- Hanneman , R. and Riddle , M. Introduction to Social Network Methods Riverside, CA University of California 2005 978-1594577147
- White , H. , Boorman , S. , and Breiger , R. Social Structure from Multiple Networks American Journal of Sociology 81 730 780 1976 10.1086/226141
- Wasserman , S. and Faust , K. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications New York Cambridge University Press 1994 9780521387071
- Faust , K. Centrality in Affiliation Networks Social Networks 19 157 191 1997 10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00300-0
- Enos , J. and Nilchiani , R. Using Social Network Analysis to Quantify Interoperability in a Large System of Systems 12th Annual System of Systems Engineering Conference Waikoloa, HI 2017
- Borgatti , S.P. Centrality and Network Flow Social Networks 27 55 71 2005 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008
- Enos , J. , Mansouri , M. , and Nilchiani , R. Applying Social Network Analysis to Systems of Systems: The Case of the 2016 Puerto Rico Power Outage 12th Annual System of Systems Engineering Conference Waikoloa, HI 2017
- Enos , J. and Nilchiani , R. Understanding How Social Network Analysis Can Provide Insights into Emergent Networks of Systems Conference on Systems Engineering Research 2017 Redondo Beach, CA 2017
- Everton , S. Terrorist Networks Association for the Study of Economics, Religion and Culture Washington, DC 2009
- CNN Nearly 1.5 Million without Power in Puerto Rico CNN 2016 www.cnn.com
- Government Accountability Office 2016