This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Non-Asbestos Organic (NAO) Disc Pad Wear Behavior: Divergence of Thickness Loss and Weight Loss
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published October 5, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
There is anecdotal evidence that disc pad wear numbers measured in thickness loss and disc pad wear numbers measured in weight loss do not show the same wear trends after wear or performance testing. However, research papers on this topic are difficult to find. Therefore, this investigation was undertaken to study and document this behavior in detail on high-copper, low-copper and no-copper (or copper-free) NAO pads. In all cases, thickness loss measurements are found to be substantially lower than expected from the weight loss data according to the SAE J2522 test schedule. This divergence is caused by pad swelling in the pad layer adjacent to the friction contact surface during brake testing at high temperatures. In addition to formulation changes, disc pad processing conditions such as mixing time and hot molding pressure are found to affect pad swelling. As pad physical properties, especially in the layer adjacent to the friction contact surface, are expected to dynamically change during braking due to the pad swelling, one has to seriously question any attempt to correlate physical properties of unused pads to brake performance and squeal generation. Detailed characterization of the dynamic changes taking place in the pad during testing/usage is recommended to gain better understanding and better prediction of brake performance and squeal.
CitationSriwiboon, M., Tiempan, N., Kaewlob, K., and Rhee, S., "Non-Asbestos Organic (NAO) Disc Pad Wear Behavior: Divergence of Thickness Loss and Weight Loss," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1866, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1866.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 8]|
- Sriwiboon, M., Tiempan, N., Kaewlob, K., Rhee, S.K. et al. , “Influence of Formulation and Process Modifications on Brake Friction, Wear and Squeal: Low-Copper NAOs and Importance of Disc Wear,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2482 , 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2482.
- Sriwiboon, M., Tiempan, N., Kaewlob, K., Rhee, S.K. et al. , “Brake Squeal and Wheel Dust vs. Disc Wear: No-Copper, Low-Copper and High-Copper NAOs,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-2660 , 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-2660.
- Sriwiboon, M., Tiempan, N., Kaewlob, K., Samankitesakul et al. , “A Study of Pad Properties vs. Friction, Wear and Brake Squeal: Processing/Porosity Effects,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1915 , 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-1915.
- Lee, S.J., Jeong, J.S., Kim, S.W., Kim, S.W. et al. , “Brake Squeal and Disc Metallurgy Variability: Importance of Disc Wear,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2491 , 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2491.
- Lee, S., Kim, S.W., Kim, S.W., Rhee, S.K. et al. , “Characterization of Disc Wear Particles Transferred to the NAO Pad Surface: Brake Squeal,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-2684 , 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-2684.
- Lee, S., Jeon, J., Jeong, J., Park, B. et al. , “Disc Brake Squeal vs. Disc Pad Compressibility-Caliper Interactions: Low-Frequency Squeal and High-Frequency Squeal vs. Differential Pad Wear,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-2528 , 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-2528.
- Chen, K.S., Yeh, R.Z., and Chang, Y.R. , “Kinetics of Thermal Decomposition of Styrene-Butadiene Rubber at Low Heating Rates in Nitrogen and Oxygen,” Combustion and Flame 108:408-418, 1997.
- Alneamah, M. and Almaamori, M. , “Study of Thermal Stability of Nitrile Rubber/Polyimide Compounds,” International Journal of Materials and Chemistry 5(1):1-3, 2015.
- Sykes Jr., G. , “Decomposition Characteristics of A Char-Forming Phenolic Polymer Used for Ablative Composites,” NASA Technical Note D-3810, 1967