This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Dynamic Stiffness Investigation of an Automotive Body-in-White by Utilizing Response Surface Methodology
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published June 13, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Noise, vibration, and harshness (NVH) attribute is needed to be included in the vehicle structure design since improving the NVH characteristics enhances the ride quality experienced by the occupants. In this regard, an efficient method was proposed to investigate the structural dynamic response of an automotive body considering low-frequency NVH performances. Moreover, the improvement of an automotive structure under the constraint of NVH behavior was investigated by using the design of experiments (DOEs) method. The DOEs methodology was for screening of the design space and generating approximation models. Here, the thicknesses of panels consisting of a body-in-white (BIW) of an automotive were employed as design variables for optimization, whose objective was to increase the first torsional and bending natural frequencies. Central composite design (CCD) for DOEs sampling and response surface methodology (RSM) were employed to optimize the dynamic stiffness. Moreover, the effects of the selected variables as well as their binary interactions were modeled and the optimum conditions for rigidity improvement were obtained via the RSM. Furthermore, the validity of the proposed optimization scheme was verified through CAE analysis. The results indicated that the first torsion and bending natural frequency were improved compared to the baseline design. Additionally, precise surrogate models in polynomial terms for the first bending and torsion natural frequencies were obtained.
CitationAbbasi, M., Fard, M., and Khalkhali, A., "Dynamic Stiffness Investigation of an Automotive Body-in-White by Utilizing Response Surface Methodology," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1479, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1479.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
- Franck, G. et al., “Numerical Simulation of the Flow around the Ahmed Vehicle Model,” Latin American Applied Research 39(4):295-306, 2009.
- Millo, F., Rolando, L., and Andreata, M., “Numerical Simulation for Vehicle Powertrain Development,”. In: Numerical Analysis - Theory and Application. (InTech, 2011).
- Samaranayake, P., Laosirihongthong, T., and Chan, F.T., “Integration of Manufacturing and Distribution Networks in a Global Car Company-Network Models and Numerical Simulation,” International Journal of Production Research 49(11):3127-3149, 2011.
- Wellmann, T., et al., Aspects of Driveline Integration for Optimized Vehicle NVH Characteristics. SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-2246, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-2246.
- Park, S.-Y., et al., A Study of Front Subframe System Optimization for Improving Vehicle NVH Performance. SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2097, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2097.
- Williams, R., et al., Using an Interactive NVH Simulator to Capture and Understand Customer Opinions about Vehicle Sound Quality. SAE Technical Paper 2007-26-036, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-26-036.
- Malen, D.E., Fundamentals of Automobile Body Structure Design (SAE International, 2011). ISBN:978-0-7680-2169-1.
- Yahaya Rashid, A.S. et al., “Improving the Dynamic Characteristics of Body-in-White Structure Using Structural Optimization,” The Scientific World Journal 2014, 2014.
- Kiani, M. et al., “Design of Lightweight Magnesium Car Body Structure under Crash and Vibration Constraints,” Journal of Magnesium and Alloys 2(2):99-108, 2014.
- Wang, L., Basu, P.K., and Leiva, J.P., “Automobile Body Reinforcement by Finite Element Optimization,” Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 40(8):879-893, 2004.
- Gang-Won, J., Young-Min, C., and Gyoo-Jae, C., “Discrete Thickness Optimization of an Automobile Body by Using the Continuous-Variable-Based Method,” Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 22(1):41-49, 2008.
- Kiani, M. and Yildiz, A.R., “A Comparative Study of Non-traditional Methods for Vehicle Crashworthiness and NVH Optimization,” Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 23(4):723-734, 2016.
- Kodiyalam, S. et al., “Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Vehicle System in a Scalable, High Performance Computing Environment,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 26(3-4):256-263, 2004.
- Kodiyalam, S. and Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J., “Multidisciplinary Design Optimisation-some Formal Methods, Framework Requirements, and Application to Vehicle Design,” International Journal of Vehicle Design 25(1-2):3-22, 2001.
- Kiani, M. et al., “Joint Stiffness Analysis and Optimization as a Mechanism for Improving the Structural Design and Performance of a Vehicle,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 228(6):689-700, 2014.
- Yildiz, A.R. and Solanki, K.N., “Multi-Objective Optimization of Vehicle Crashworthiness Using a New Particle Swarm Based Approach,” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 59(1):367-376, 2012.
- Lee, K. and Kang, D., “Structural Optimization of an Automotive Door Using the Kriging Interpolation Method,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 221(12):1525-1534, 2007.
- Yildiz, A.R., “A New Hybrid Artificial Bee Colony Algorithm for Robust Optimal Design and Manufacturing,” Applied Soft Computing 13(5):2906-2912, 2013.
- Gandikota, I. et al., “Multilevel Vehicle-Dummy Design Optimization for Mass and Injury Criteria Minimization,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 229(3):283-295, 2015.
- Atashpaz-Gargari, E. and Lucas, C., “Imperialist Competitive Algorithm: An Algorithm for Optimization Inspired by Imperialistic Competition,” IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2007. CEC 2007, 2007. IEEE
- Kiani, M. et al., “Surrogate-Based Optimization of Automotive Structures under Multiple Crash and Vibration Design Criteria,” International Journal of Crashworthiness 18(5):473-482, 2013.
- Khuri, A.I. and Mukhopadhyay, S., “Response Surface Methodology,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics 2(2):128-149, 2010.
- Mason, R.L., Gunst, R.F., and Hess, J.L., Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments: With Applications to Engineering and Science. Vol. 474 (John Wiley & Sons, 2003).
- Deb, A. et al., “Practical versus RSM-Based MDO in Vehicle Body Design,” SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems 5(1):110-119, 2012.
- Padmanaban, R. et al., “Multi-Disciplinary Optimization of a Sport Utility Vehicle,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0251, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0251.
- Yazdi, M.S. and Khorram, A., “Modeling and Optimization of Milling Process by Using RSM and ANN Methods,” International Journal of Engineering and Technology 2(5):474, 2010.
- Kodiyalam, S. and Yang, R.-J., “Optimization of Car Body under Constraints of Noise, Vibration, and Harshness (NVH), and Crash,” Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 22:295-306, 2001.
- Craig, K.J. et al., “MDO of Automotive Vehicle for Crashworthiness and NVH Using Response Surface Methods,” AIAA Paper5607, 2002.
- Shariyat, M. and Djamshidi, P., “Minimizing the Engine-Induced Harshness Based on the DOE Method and Sensitivity Analysis of the Full Vehicle NVH Model,” International Journal of Automotive Technology 10(6):687-696, 2009.
- Khaknejad, M.B. and Keshavarz, A., “Refining Pickup Cabin NVH Quality via Optimising Exhaust Mountings Using DOE Method,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-2008, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-2008.
- Montgomery, D.C., Design and Analysis of Experiments (John Wiley & Sons, 2017).
- Derringer, G. and Suich, R., “Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables,” Journal of Quality Technology 214-219, 1980.