This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Rear-Facing Child Restraint Systems in Rear Impact Sled Tests
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 3, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
This study examines the performance of rear-facing child restraint systems (RF CRS) in moderate severity rear impact sled tests. The study also investigates the effects of RF CRS features on CRS kinematics and anthropomorphic test device (ATD) injury metrics in this scenario. Twelve tests were conducted at a moderate severity rear impact sled pulse (approximately 28.2 km/h and 18.4 g). Four models of RF CRS were tested in the rear outboard positions of a sedan seat. The CRABI 12-month-old and Hybrid III 3-year-old ATDs were instrumented with head and chest accelerometers, head angular rate sensors, six-axis upper neck load cells, and a chest linear potentiometer (3-year-old only). The effects of carry handle position, occupant size, presence of anti-rebound bar, Swedish style tethering, and lower anchor vs. seat belt installation were investigated. Data were also compared to pediatric injury assessment reference values (IARV). Head Injury Criterion (HIC15) values ranged from 9.6 to 89.2. Chest resultant accelerations (3 ms duration) ranged from 21.3 to 39.9 g. Neck loads and head contact against seat structures varied depending on the features of the CRS. The results indicate that RF CRS mitigate crash forces with a variety of methods in the moderate severity rear impacts performed in this series. This study provides experimental data to address this crash scenario, which are currently lacking in the literature. These conclusions are supported by epidemiological and field data which indicate RF CRS provide good protection for young occupants.
CitationMansfield, J., Kang, Y., and Bolte, J., "Rear-Facing Child Restraint Systems in Rear Impact Sled Tests," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1325, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1325.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
- National Center for Statistics and Analysis, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, “Traffic Safety Facts; Children: 2014 data,” Report No. DOT HS 812 271, 2016.
- Jakobsson, L., Isaksson-Hellman, I., and Lundell, B., “Safety for the growing child: experiences from Swedish accident data,” Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper No 05-0330, 2005.
- Henary, B., Sherwood, C., Crandall, J., Kent, R. et al. , “Car safety seats for children: rear facing for best protection,” Inj Prev 13:398-402, 2007, doi:10.1136/ip.2006.015115.
- Williams, J., O’Donel, C., and Leiss, P., “Effects of LATCH versus available seatbelt installation of rear facing child restraint systems on head injury criteria for 6 month old infants in rear end collisions,” Traffic Inj Prev 16:S16-S23, 2015, doi:10.1080/15389588.2015.1067804.
- Viano, D. and Parenteau, C., “Serious injury in very-low and very-high speed rear impacts,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1485 , 2008a, doi:10.4271/2008-01-1485.
- Arbogast, K. and Durbin, D., “Epidemiology of child motor vehicle crash injuries and fatalities,” . In: Crandall J., Myers B., Meany D., and Schmidtke S., editors. Pediatric Injury Biomechanics: Archive and Textbook. (New York, Springer, 2013), 33-86, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4154-0_2.
- Viano, D. and Parenteau, C., “Fatalities of children 0-7 years old in the second row,” Traffic Inj Prev 9:231-237, 2008b, doi:10.1080/15389580801957671.
- Langwieder, K., Hummel, T., and Finkbeiner, F., “Injury risks of children in cars depending on the type of restraint,” Presented at Child Occupant Protection in Motor Vehicle Crashes, Spain, Sept. 22, 1999, ISBN: 1-86058-240-0.
- Melvin, J., “Injury assessment reference values for the CRABI 6-Month infant dummy in a rear-facing infant restraint with air bag deployment,” SAE Technical Paper 950872 , 1995, doi:10.4271/950872.
- Mertz, H., Irwin, A., and Prasad, P., “Biomechanical and scaling basis for frontal and side impact injury assessment reference values,” Stapp Car Crash Journal 60:625-657, 2016.
- UNECE , “Uniform provisions concerning the approval of restraining devices for child occupants of power-driven vehicles (“Child Restraint Systems”),” Regulation No. 44, Addendum 43, Revision 3, Feb. 2014.
- Manary, M., Reed, M., Klinich, K., Ritchie, N. et al. , “The effects of tethering rear-facing child restraint systems on ATD responses,” Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med 50:397-410, 2006.
- McMurry, T., Arbogast, K., Sherwood, C., Vaca, F. et al. , “Rear-facing versus forward-facing child restraints: an updated assessment,” Published Online First: Nov. 25, 2017, doi:10.1136/injprev-2017-042512.
- NHTSA , “Laboratory Test Procedure for FMVSS 213: Child Restraint Systems,” Department of Transportation. TP-213-10, Feb. 16, 2014.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice , “Instrumentation for Impact Test,” SAE Standard SAEJ211-1, 2007.
- NHTSA , “Child Restraint Systems,” Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 213, 49 CFR 571.213, Federal Register 915-957, 2011.
- Sherwood, C., Abdelilah, Y., and Crandall, J., “The effect of Swedish tethers on the performance of rear facing child restraints in frontal crashes,” Proceedings of the 19th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, Paper Number 05-0346, 2005.
- NHTSA, “Head Restraints,” Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 202a, 49 CFR 571, Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0148, Federal Register 67233-67247, 2010.