This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Using Shoulder Bolster and Knee Bolster to Achieve Protection Effect Comparable to Seatbelt and Airbag
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Seatbelt and airbags provide effective occupant restraint, but are also potential to induce intrusive deformation and submarining injuries in motor vehicle crashes. To address these issues, this study puts forward a new restraint concept that applies restraint loads on shoulders and knees/femurs, i.e., the sturdiest regions of human body, via a combined use of shoulder bolster and knee bolster based on biomechanical computational analysis. The load characteristics of the two bolsters were optimized to obtain protection effectiveness superior to conventional use of seatbelt and airbag. Occupant kinematics and kinetics were taken into account, including the excursions of head, shoulders and knees, the accelerations of head and chest, and the compressions of thorax on several locations on the ribcage. The injury risk of rib fractures was monitored based on the strain levels of ribcage. Results show that applying adaptive restraint loads on the sturdy regions of human body using shoulder bolster and knee bolster can ensure reasonable kinematical motion and acceptable injury levels of occupant, and can also avoid intrusive deformations in thorax and abdomen as well as airbag hazards. The protection effect of shoulder bolster and knee bolster is comparable or superior to that of using seatbelt and airbag. To achieve a balance of comfort and safety in autonomous driving environment, the system will be activated only when collision is sensed unavoidable.
CitationHuang, Y., Zhou, Q., Ji, P., and Nie, B., "Using Shoulder Bolster and Knee Bolster to Achieve Protection Effect Comparable to Seatbelt and Airbag," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1170, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1170.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- World Health Organization , “Global Status Report on Road Safety 2015,” WHO, 2015.
- Kent, R., Forman, J., Parent, D.P., and Kuppa, S. , “Rear Seat Occupant Protection in Frontal Crashes and Its Feasibility,” 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles Conference, 2007.
- Forman, J., Michaelson, J., Kent, R., Kuppa, S. et al. , “Occupant Restraint in the Rear Seat: ATD Responses to Standard and Pre-tensioning, Force-limiting Belt Restraints,” Ann Adv Automot Med. 52:141-154, 2008.
- Cummings, P., Wells, J.D., and Rivara, F.P. , “Estimating Seat Belt Effectiveness Using Matched Pair Cohort Methods,” Accid Anal Prev 35:143-149, 2003.
- Carroll, J.A., Cuerden, R., Richards, D., Smith, S. et al. , “Matrix of Serious Thorax Injuries by Occupant Characteristics, Impact Conditions and Restraint Type and Identification of the Important Injury Mechanisms to be Considered in THORAX and THOMO; Consisting of One Main Summary Report and Three Annexes,” Thorax 1:1, 2009.
- Hu, J., Fischer, K., Lange, P., and Adler, A. , “Effects of Crash Pulse, Impact Angle, Occupant size, Front Seat Location, and Restraint System on Rear Seat Occupant Protection,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1453 , 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1453.
- MacLaughlin F., Sullivan K., and O’Connor S. , “Experimental Investigation of Rear Seat Submarining,” 30th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Technical Paper 896032 , 1989, doi:10.4271/896032.
- Parenteau, C. and Viano, D.C. , “Field Data Analysis of Rear Occupant Injuries Part I: Adults and Teenagers,” SAE SP 1-8, 2003.
- Bailey, H., Perez, N., Blank-Reid, C., and Kaplan, L.J. , “Atlanto-Occipital Dislocation: An Unusual Lethal Airbag Injury,” Journal of Emergency Medicine 18(2):215, 2000.
- Forman, J., Stacey, S., Evans, J., and Kent, R. , “Posterior Acceleration as a Mechanism of Blunt Traumatic Injury of the Aorta,” Journal of Biomechanics 41(6):1359-1364, 2008.
- Adomeit, D. , “Evaluation Methods for the Biomechanical Quality of Restraint Systems during Frontal Impact,” SAE Technical Paper 770936 , 1977, doi:10.4271/770936.
- Ji, P. and Zhou, Q. , “Preliminary Study of Uniform Restraint Concept for Protection of Rear-seat Occupant under Mid and High Crash Severities,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-1528 , 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-1528.
- Michaelson, J., Forman, J., Kent, R., and Kuppa, S. , “Rear Seat Occupant Safety: Kinematics and Injury of PMHS Restrained by a Standard 3-Point Belt in Frontal Crashes,” Stapp Car Crash Journal 52:295-325, 2008.
- Horsch, J., Melvin, J., Viano, D., and Mertz, H. , “Thoracic Injury Assessment of Belt Restraint Systems based on Hybrid III Chest Compression,” SAE Technical Paper Number 912895 , 1991, doi:10.4271/912895.
- Shaw, G., Parent, D., Purtsezov, S., and Lessley, D. , “Impact Response of Restrained PMHS in Frontal Sled Tests: Skeletal Deformation Patterns under Seat Belt Loading,” Stapp Car Crash Journal 53:1-48, 2009.
- Burstein, A.H., Reilly, D.T., and Martens, M. , “Aging of Bone Tissue: Mechanical Properties,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery American 58(1):82, 1976.