This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Automotive Crashworthiness Design Optimization Based on Efficient Global Optimization Method
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Finite element (FE) models are commonly used for automotive crashworthiness design. However, even with increasing speed of computers, the FE-based simulation is still too time-consuming when simulating the complex dynamic process such as vehicle crashworthiness. To improve the computational efficiency, the response surface model, as the surrogate of FE model, has been widely used for crashworthiness optimization design. Before introducing the surrogate model into the design optimization, the surrogate should satisfy the accuracy requirements. However, the bias of surrogate model is introduced inevitably. Meanwhile, it is also very difficult to decide how many samples are needed when building the high fidelity surrogate model for the system with strong nonlinearity. In order to solve the aforementioned problems, the application of a kind of surrogate optimization method called Efficient Global Optimization (EGO) is proposed to conduct the crashworthiness design optimization. Based on few samples, the initial Kriging models are constructed. Then the new sample found by the expected improvement criterion (EI) is employed to update the Kriging models in each subsequent loop iteration. Since the expected improvement criterion can balance the global search and local search, a global optimal design will be found after several iterations. Thus, EGO will reduce the number of computationally expensive evaluations while achieving the desired optimal design. The application of the EGO on vehicle crashworthiness design is demonstrated through a case of vehicle low speed crash design. And a comparison study between the EGO and traditional surrogate model based crashworthiness design optimization method indicates that the EGO method is more effective in crashworthiness design.
CitationFang, Y., Chen, T., Zhan, Z., Liu, X. et al., "Automotive Crashworthiness Design Optimization Based on Efficient Global Optimization Method," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1029, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1029.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- Yang, R.J., Akkerman, A., and Anderson, D.F., “Robustness Optimization for Vehicular Crash Simulations,” Computing in Science & Engineering 2(6):8-13, 2000, doi:10.1109/5992. 881701.
- Zhan, Z., Fu, Y., Yang, R.J., and Peng, Y.H., “An Automatic Model Calibration Method for Occupant Restraint Systems,” Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization 44(6):815-822, 2011, doi:10. 1007/s00158-011-0671-6.
- Gu, X., Sun, G., Li, G., Huang, X. et al. , “Multiobjective Optimization Design for Vehicle Occupant Restraint System under Frontal Impact,” Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization 47(3):465-477, 2013, doi:10. 1007/s00158-012-0811-7.
- Viana, F.A.C., Haftka, R.T., and Steffen, V.,.J., “Multiple Surrogates: How Cross-Validation Errors Can Help Us to Obtain the Best Predictor,” Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization 39(4):439-457, 2009, doi:10.1007/s00158-008-0338-0.
- Simpson, T.W., Poplinski, J.D., Koch, P.N., and Allen, J.K., “Surrogates for Computer-Based Engineering Design: Survey and Recommendations,” Engineering with Computers 17(2):129-150, 2001, doi:10.1007/PL00007198.
- Wang, G.G. and Shan, S., “Review of Surrogateing Techniques in Support of Engineering Design Optimization,” ASME 2006 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (Vol. 129, 415-426), American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2006, doi:10.1115/1.2429697.
- Vapnik, V., Golowich, S.E., and Smola, A., “Support Vector Method for Function Approximation, Regression Estimation, and Signal Processing,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 9:281-287, 1997.
- Pan, F. and Zhu, P., “Lightweight Design of Vehicle Front-End Structure: Contributions of Multiple Surrogates,” International Journal of Vehicle Design 57(2/3):124, 2011, doi:10. 1504/IJVD.2011.044718.
- Yang, R.J., Wang, N., Tho, C.H. et al. , “Surrogating Development for Vehicle Frontal Impact Simulation,” Journal of Mechanical Design 127(5):1014-1020, 2005, doi:10.1115/1.1906264.
- Xu, H., Chuang, C.H., and Yang, R.J., “A Data Mining-Based Strategy for Direct Multidisciplinary Optimization,” SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 8(2):357-363, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0479.
- Zhan, Z., Fu, Y., and Yang, R.J., “On Stochastic Model Interpolation and Extrapolation Methods for Vehicle Design,” SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 6(3):517-531, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1386.
- Shi, L., Fu, Y., Yang, R.J., Wang, B.P. et al. , “Selection of Initial Designs for Multi-Objective Optimization Using Classification and Regression Tree,” Structural & Multidisciplinary Optimization 48(6):1057-1073, 2013, doi:10.1007/s00158-013-0947-0.
- Zhan, Z., Fu, Y., Yang, R.J., Xi, Z. et al. , “A Bayesian Inference based Model Interpolation and Extrapolation,” SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 5(2):357-364, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-0223.
- Kai, Z., Hu, J., Peng, Y., Zhan, Z. et al. , “A Bayesian Inference Method for Model Extrapolation Together with Qualitative Knowledge,” Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University 46(6):994-998, 2012.
- Yang, J., Zhan, Z., Zheng, K., Hu, J. et al. , “Enhanced Similarity-Based Surrogate Updating Strategy for Reliability-Based Design Optimization in Auto-Motive Design Applications,” Engineering Optimization, 2016, doi:10.1080/ 0305215X. 2016. 1150469.
- Zhan, Z., Fu, Y., and Yang, R.J., “A Stochastic Bias Corrected Response Surface Method and Its Application to Reliability-Based Design Optimization,” Finite Element Analysis 7(2):262-268, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-0731.
- Jiang, Z., Chen, W., Fu, Y., and Yang, R.J., “Reliability-Based Design Optimization with Model Bias and Data Uncertainty,” SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 6(3):502-516, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1384.
- Li, W., Chen, S., Jiang, Z., Apley, D.W. et al. , “Integrating Bayesian Calibration, Bias Correction, and Machine Learning for the 2014 Sandia Verification and Validation Challenge Problem,” ASME. J. Verif. Valid. Uncert. 1(1):011004-011004-12, 2014, doi:10.1115/1.4031983.
- Xi, Z., Fu, Y., and Yang, R.J., “An Ensemble Approach for Model Bias Prediction,” SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf. 6(3), 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1387.
- Xi, Z. and Yang, R.J., “Reliability Analysis with Model Uncertainty Coupling with Parameter and Experiment Uncertainties: A Case Study of 2014 v&v Challenge Problem,” ASME, 2014.
- Pan, H., Xi, Z., and Yang, R.J., “Model Uncertainty Approximation Using a Copula-Based Approach for Reliability Based Design Optimization,” Struct Multidisc Optim 54:1543, 2016, doi:10.1007/s00158-016-1530-2.
- Gary Wang, G. and Dong, Z., “Adaptive Response Surface Method: A Global Optimization Scheme for Approximation-Based Design Problems,” Engineering Optimization 33(6):707-733, 2001.
- Jones, D.R., “Efficient Global Optimization of Expensive Black-Box Functions,” Journal of Global Optimization 13(4):455-492, 1998, doi:10.1023/A:1008306431147.
- Sasena, M.J., “Flexibility and Efficiency Enhancements for Constrained Global Design Optimization with Kriging Approximations,” 2002.
- Halgrin, J.L., “Integrated Simplified Crash Modelling Approach Dedicated to Pre-Design Stage: Evaluation on a Front Car Part,” International Journal of Vehicle Safety 3(1):91-115, 2008, doi:10.1504/IJVS.2008.020086.
- SAE International Surface Vehicle Recommended Practice , “Laboratory Measurement of the Composite Vibration Damping Properties of Material on a Supporting Steel Bar,” SAE Standard J1637 , Rev. Aug. 2007.