This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Investigation of the Samples Size Effects on Hybrid Surrogate Model Component Surrogates for Crashworthiness Design
Technical Paper
2018-01-1028
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
Surrogate model based design optimization has been widely adopted in automotive industry. Hybrid surrogate model with multiple component surrogates is considered to be a better choice when simulating highly non-linear responses in vehicle crashworthiness analysis. Currently, the number of component surrogates has to be decided before-hand when constructing of a hybrid surrogate model. This paper conducts a comparative study on the performances of three popular hybrid modeling methods including heuristic computation strategy, and two kinds of optimal weighted surrogates. The effects of samples size on the number of individual surrogates that should be included into the final hybrid surrogate models for crashworthiness responses are investigated. Different hybrid modeling techniques and multiple validation criteria are evaluated. Some observations and conclusions on the selection of component surrogates in hybrid surrogate modeling are given in the end.
Recommended Content
Authors
Citation
Chen, C., Zhan, Z., Dong, W., YU, H. et al., "Investigation of the Samples Size Effects on Hybrid Surrogate Model Component Surrogates for Crashworthiness Design," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-1028, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-1028.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 |
Also In
References
- Yang , R.J. , Wang , N. , Tho , C.J. , Bobineau , J.P. , and Wang , B.P. Metamodeling Development for Vehicle Frontal Impact Simulation Journal of Mechanical Design 127 5 1014 2005
- Xu , H. , Chuang , C. , and Yang , R. A Data Mining-Based Strategy for Direct Multidisciplinary Optimization SAE Int. J. Mater. Manf 8 2 357 363 2015 10.4271/2015-01-0479
- Forrester , D. A. I. J. , Sóbester , D. A. , and Keane , A. J. 2008 10.1002/9780470770801
- Jin , R. , Chen , W. , and Simpson , T. Comparative Studies of Metamodelling Techniques under Multiple Modelling Criteria Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 23 1 1 13 2001 10.1007/s00158-001-0160-4
- Simpson , T. , Poplinski , J. , Koch , P. , and Allen , J.K. Metamodels for Computer-Based Engineering Design: Survey and Recommendations EWC 17 2 129 150 2001 10.1007/PL00007198
- Fang , H. , Rais-Rohani , M. , Liu , Z. , and Horstemeyer , M.F. A Comparative Study of Metamodeling Methods for Multiobjective Crashworthiness Optimization Computers & Structures 83 2121 2136 2005 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.02.025
- Yang , R. , Chuang , C. , and Fu , Y. an Effective Optimization Strategy for Structural Weight Reduction SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0647 2010 10.4271/2010-01-0647
- Acar , E. and Rais-Rohani , M. Ensemble of Metamodels with Optimized Weight Factors Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 37 3 279 294 2009 10.1007/s00158-008-0230-y
- Goel , T. , Haftka , R.T. , Shyy , W. , and Queipo , N.V. Ensemble of Surrogates Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 33 3 199 216 2007 10.1007/s00158-006-0051-9
- Viana , F.A.C. , Haftka , R.T. , and Steffen , V. Multiple Surrogates: How Cross-Validation errors can Help us to Obtain the Best predictor Optim. 39 3 439 457 2009 10.1007/s00158-008-0338-0
- Zhou , X. and Jiang , T. Metamodel Selection Based on Stepwise Regression Struct. Multidisc. Optim. 54 3 641 657 2016 10.1007/s00158-016-1442-1
- Ferreira , W.G. and Serpa , A.L. Ensemble of Metamodels: The Augmented Least Squares approach Optim. 53 4 1019 1046 2016 10.1007/s00158-015-1366-1
- Perrone , M.P. and Cooper , L.N. When networks disagree: Ensemble methods for hybrid neural networks Artificial Neural Networks for Speech and Vision London Chapman & Hall 1993 10.1142/9789812795885_0025
- Hashem , S. Optimal Linear Combinations of Neural Networks Neural Networks 10 4 599 614 1997 10.1016/S0893-6080(96)00098-6
- Acar , E. and Solanki , K. Improving the Accuracy of Vehicle Crashworthiness Response Predictions Using an Ensemble of Metamodels International Journal of Crashworthiness 14 1 49 61 2009 10.1080/13588260802462419
- National Crash Analysis Center 2001 www.ncac.gwu.edu/archives/model/index.html
- Savic , V. , Pawlicki , M. , Krajewski , P. , Voss , M. et al. Passive Pedestrian Protection Approach for Vehicle Hoods SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-0513 2014 10.4271/2014-01-0513
- Shi , L. , Yang , R.J. , and Zhu , P. A Method for Selecting Surrogate Models in Crashworthiness Optimization Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization 46 2 159 170 2012 10.1007/s00158-012-0760-1
- Viana F.A.C. 2009 Http://fchegury.googlepages.com