This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Development of Low Temperature Three-Way Catalysts for High Efficiency Gasoline Engines of the Future: Part II
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
It is anticipated that future gasoline engines will have improved mechanical efficiency and consequently lower exhaust temperatures at low load conditions, although the exhaust temperatures at high load conditions are expected to remain the same or even increase due to the increasing use of downsized turbocharged engines. In 2014, a collaborative project was initiated at Ford Motor Company, Oak Ridge National Lab, and the University of Michigan to develop three-way catalysts with improved performance at low temperatures while maintaining the durability of current TWCs. This project is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy and is intended to show progress toward the USDRIVE target of 90% conversion of hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxides (NOx) at 150 °C after high mileage aging. The testing protocols specified by the USDRIVE ACEC team for stoichiometric S-GDI engines were utilized during the evaluation of experimental catalysts at all three facilities. This paper summarizes work performed at Ford on the development of a catalyst formulation with significantly lower lightoff temperatures than a current production TWC after aging on a high temperature 4-mode durability cycle. The new catalyst consists of rhodium post-impregnated onto an overlayer of titanium deposited onto a silica-stabilized Al2O3 support. A rhodium loading study revealed that the lowest T90 s after 4-mode aging were obtained with 0.5% Rh. A titanium loading study showed that that the best performance after 4-mode aging was obtained with 8% titanium, which corresponded to the monolayer coverage of titanium. TEM analysis confirmed that the titanium monolayer remained well dispersed after the high temperature aging. A fresh sample of the optimized catalyst was evaluated after sulfur poisoning and after a stoichiometric desulfation.
CitationTheis, J., Getsoian, A., and Lambert, C., "The Development of Low Temperature Three-Way Catalysts for High Efficiency Gasoline Engines of the Future: Part II," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0939, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0939.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- Shelef, M. and McCabe, R.W. , “Twenty-Five Years After Introduction of Automotive Catalysts: What Next?” Catalysis Today 62(1):35-50, 2000, doi:10.1016/S0920-5861(00)00407-7.
- Environmental Protection Agency , EPA-420-F-12-051, https://www3.epa.gov/otaq/climate/documents/420fl2051.pdf.
- Future Automotive Aftertreatment Solutions: The 150°C Challenge Workshop Report, November 29-30, 2012.
- Hayek, K., Kramer, R., and Paál, Z. , “Metal-Support Boundary Sites in Catalysis,” Applied Catalysis A: General 162(1-2):1-15, 1997, doi:10.1016/S0926-860X(97)00243-3.
- USDRIVE Advanced Combustion and Emission Control Tech Team , “Aftertreatment Protocols for Catalyst Characterization and Performance Evaluations: Low-Temperature Oxidation Catalyst Test Protocol,” Rev. 2015, available at www.cleers.org.
- Theis, J., Getsoian, A., and Lambert, C. , “The Development of Low Temperature Three-Way Catalysts for High Efficiency Gasoline Engines of the Future,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 10(2), 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0918.
- Hepburn, J., Dobson, D., Hubbard, C., and Otto, K. , “The Pulse Flame Combustor Revisited,” SAE Paper Number 962118 , 1996, doi:10.4271/962118.
- 40 CFR Part 86 . “Emission Durability Procedures for New Light-Duty Vehicles, Light-Duty Trucks and Heavy-Duty Vehicles,” Federal Register 69, 17531 (2004).