This content is not included in
your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Impact of Ethanol-Gasoline Port Injected on Performance and Exhaust Emissions of a Turbocharged SI Engine
Technical Paper
2018-01-0914
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
This content contains downloadable datasets
Annotation ability available
Sector:
Language:
English
Abstract
This paper presents results of an experimental investigation on a flexible port dual fuel injection using different ethanol to gasoline mass fractions. A four stroke, two cylinder turbocharged SI engine was used for the experiments. The engine speed was set at 3000 rpm, tests were carried out at medium-high load and two air-fuel-ratio.
The initial reference conditions were set running the engine, fueled with full gasoline at the KLSA boundary, in accordance with the standard ECU engine map. This engine point was representative of a rich mixture (λ=0.9) in order to control the knock and the temperature at turbine inlet. The investigated fuels included different ethanol-gasoline mass fractions (E10, E20, E30 and E85), supplied by dual injection within the intake manifold. A spark timing sweep, both at stoichiometric and lean (λ=1.1) conditions, up to the most advanced one without knock was carried out. Engine performance, gaseous exhaust emissions, particle size distribution and particulate matter were measured and the results were compared to the gasoline reference case.
The main results showed that the E20 and E30 ethanol mass fractions, allowing advanced spark timings, achieved the same engine load as the gasoline case with a significant increase in thermal efficiency (≅10%), in spite of alcohol’s lower energy content. Compared to gasoline, E30 or E85 attained a significant reduction in particle number emissions as well a cut of the particulate mass (60-80%), particularly significant for the lean case (90%).
Authors
Topic
Citation
Marchitto, L., Tornatore, C., Costagliola, M., and Valentino, G., "Impact of Ethanol-Gasoline Port Injected on Performance and Exhaust Emissions of a Turbocharged SI Engine," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0914, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0914.Data Sets - Support Documents
Title | Description | Download |
---|---|---|
Unnamed Dataset 1 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 2 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 3 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 4 | ||
Unnamed Dataset 5 |
Also In
References
- Junginger , M. , Goh , C.S. , and Faaij , A. International Bioenergy Trade, History, status & outlook on securing sustainable bioenergy supply, demand and markets Springer ed 2014 10.1007/978-94-007-6982-3
- Bae , C. and Kim , J. Alternative Fuels for Internal Combustion Engines Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 36 3 3389 3413 2017 10.1016/j.proci.2016.09.009
- Thangavelu , S.K. , Ahmed , A.S. , and Ani , F.N. Review on Bioethanol as Alternative Fuel for Spark Ignition Engines Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 56 820 835 2016 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.089
- Wanga , C. , Zeraati-Rezaei , S. , Xiang , L. , and Xu , H. Ethanol blends in spark ignition engines: RON, octane-added value, cooling effect, compression ratio, and potential engine efficiency gain Applied Energy 191 (2017) 603-619 603 619 doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.191.081
- Su , J. , Xu , M. , Li , T. , Gao , Y. , and Wang , J. Combined effects of cooled EGR and a higher geometric compression ratio on thermal efficiency improvement of a downsized boosted spark-ignition direct-injection engine Energy Con. and Management 78 65 73 2014 10.1016/j.enconman.2013.10.041
- Chen , L. , Braisher , M. , Crossley , A. , Stone , R. et al. The Influence of Ethanol Blends on Particulate Matter Emissions from Gasoline Direct Injection Engines SAE Technical Paper 2010-01-0793 2010 10.4271/2010-01-0793
- Maricq , M.M. , Szente , J.J. , and Jahr , K. The Impact of Ethanol Fuel Blends on PM Emissions from a Light-Duty GDI Vehicle Aerosol Science and Technology 46 5 576 583 2012 10.1080/02786826.2011.648780
- Bielaczyc , P. , Woodburn , J. , Klimkiewicz , D. , Pajdowski , P. , and Szczotka , A. An Examination of the Effect of Ethanol-Gasoline blends' Physicochemical Properties on Emissions from a Light-Duty Spark Ignition Engine Fuel Processing Technology 107 50 63 2013 10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.07.030
- Maricq , M.M. , Xu , N. , and Chase , R.E. Measuring Particulate Mass Emissions with the Electrical Low Pressure Impactor Aerosol Science and Technology 40 1 68 79 2006 10.1080/02786820500466591
- Scanlon , J. , Donald E. Willis Calculation of Flame Ionization Detector Relative Response Factors Using the Effective Carbon Number Concept Journal of Chromatographic Science 23 1985 10.1093/chromsci/23.8.333 333 340
- Kar , K. and Cheng , W. Speciated Engine-out Organic Gas Emissions from a PFI-SI Engine Operating on Ethanol/Gasoline Mixtures SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 2 2 91 101 2010 10. 4271/2009-01-2673.
- E. Gramsch , V. Papapostolou , F. Reyes , Y. Vásquez , M. Castillo , P. Oyola , G. López , A. Cádiz , S. Ferguson , M. Wolfson , J. Lawrence & P. Koutrakis 2017 Variability in the primary emissions and secondary gas and particle formation from vehicles using bio-ethanol mixtures, J. of the Air & Waste Manag Association 10.1080/10962247.2017. 1386600
- Arsie , I. , Di Iorio , S. , and Vaccaro , S. Experimental Investigation of the Effects of AFR, Spark Advance and EGR on Nanoparticle Emissions in a PFI SI Engine Journal of Aerosol Science 64 1 10 2013 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.05.005
- Daniel , R. , Tian , G. , Xu , H. , Wyszynski , M.L. et al. Effect of spark timing and load on a DISI engine fuelled with 2,5-dimethylfuran Fuel 90 449 458 2011 doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel..008
- Szybist , J.P. , Youngquist , A.D. , Barone , T.L. et al. Ethanol Blends and Engine Operating Strategy Effects on Light-Duty Spark-Ignition Engine Particle Emissions Energy Fuels 25 4977 4985 2011 doi.org/10.1021/ef201127y
- Costagliola , M.A. , De Simio , L. , Iannaccone , S. , and Prati , M.V. Combustion Efficiency and Engine out Emissions of a S.I. Engine Fueled with Alcohol/Gasoline Blends Applied Energy 111 1162 1171 2013 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.042