This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Dual-Fuel Gasoline-Alcohol Engines for Heavy Duty Trucks: Lower Emissions, Flexible-Fuel Alternative to Diesel Engines
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Long-haul and other heavy-duty trucks, presently almost entirely powered by diesel fuel, face challenges meeting worldwide needs for greatly reducing nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. Dual-fuel gasoline-alcohol engines could potentially provide a means to cost-effectively meet this need at large scale in the relatively near term. They could also provide reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. These spark ignition (SI) flexible fuel engines can provide operation over a wide fuel range from mainly gasoline use to 100% alcohol use. The alcohol can be ethanol or methanol. Use of stoichiometric operation and a three-way catalytic converter can reduce NOx by around 90% relative to emissions from diesel engines with state of the art exhaust treatment.
Alcohol from a second tank is used to provide increased knock resistance at higher values of torque, enabling high compression ratio, turbocharged operation that provides comparable efficiency and torque to a diesel engine in a smaller size engine. The alcohol can be neat or a high concentration blend. It can also be a hydrous alcohol (alcohol and water). Hydrous alcohol use can reduce the fraction of fuel that must be provided by alcohol by knock suppression through evaporative cooling.
We have used computational models to determine minimal alcohol requirements for knock-free operation and to provide illustrative engine parameters for various forms of alcohol and engine operation modes, including upspeeding to reduce alcohol required for knock suppression and use of open-valve port fuel injection to facilitate use of modified SI natural gas or diesel engines as gasoline/alcohol engines.
CitationCohn, D. and Bromberg, L., "Dual-Fuel Gasoline-Alcohol Engines for Heavy Duty Trucks: Lower Emissions, Flexible-Fuel Alternative to Diesel Engines," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0888, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0888.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|Unnamed Dataset 1|
|Unnamed Dataset 2|
|Unnamed Dataset 3|
- McCracken , R. 2017
- Anderson , S.C. , Miller , J. , Minares , R. , et al. , Impacts and Mitigation of Excess Diesel-Related NO x Emissions in 11 Major Vehicle Markets , Nature 545 467 471 2017
- State of California Air Resources Board (CARB) 2015
- California Air Resources Board 2017 https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/hdlownox/hdlownox.htm
- Exxon Mobil http://corporate.exxonmobil.com/en/energy/energy-outlook/2017-highlights/a-view-to-2040 2017
- Cummins Westport Press Release 2017
- Brandt , A.R. , Heath , G.A. , Kort , E.A. , O’Sullivan , F. et al. Methane Leaks from North American Natural Gas Systems Science 343 733 735 2014
- Perfetto , A and Geckler , S.
- Bromberg , L. and Cohn , D. Alcohol Fueled Heavy Duty Vehicles Using Clean, High Efficiency Engines SAE Technical Paper 2010012199 2010 10.4271/2010-01-2199
- Cohn , D.R. , Bromberg , L. & Heywood , J.B.
- Jo , Y. , Bromberg , L. , and Heywood , J. Optimal Use of Ethanol in Dual Fuel Applications: Effects of Engine Downsizing, Spark Retard, and Compression Ratio on Fuel Economy SAE Int. J. Engines 9 2 1087 1101 2016 10.4271/2016-01-0786
- Ford Motor Company, AVL, and Ethanol Boosting Systems (EBS) 2012
- Cohn , D.R. , Bromberg , L. and Heywood , J. 2008
- Stein , R. , Anderson , J. , and Wallington , T. An Overview of the Effects of Ethanol-Gasoline Blends on SI Engine Performance, Fuel Efficiency, and Emissions SAE Int. J. Engines 6 1 2013 10.4271/2013-01-1635
- McGee , J. , Curtis , E. , Russ , S. , and Lavoie , G. The Effects of Port Fuel Injection Timing and Targeting on Fuel Preparation Relative to a Pre-Vaporized System SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-2834 2000 10.4271/2000-01-2834
- Anderson , J.E. , DiCicco , D.M. , Ginder , J.M. , Kramer , U. et al. Octane Number Ethanol-Gasoline Blends: Quantifying the Potential Benefits in the United States FueI 97 585 594 2012
- Mehl , M. , Pitz , W.J. , Westbrook , C.K. et al. Kinetic Modeling of Gasoline Surrogate Components and Mixtures under Engine Conditions Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 33 193 200 2011
- Jo , Y.S. , Lewis , R. , Bromberg , L. and Heywood , J. https://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/1241492
- Assessment and Standards Division US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas Emissions Model (GEM) 2015
- BorgWarner http://www.turbos.bwauto.com/products/turbochargerExhaustTemperature.aspx
- Matsumoto , K. , Tojo , M. , Jinnai , Y. , Hayashi , N. et al. Development of Compact and High Performance Turbocharger for 1,050°C Exhaust Gas Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Technical Review 45 3 Sep. 2008 http://www.mhi.co.jp/technology/review/pdf/e453/e453001.pdf
- Reinhart , T. and Megel , M. An Efficient, Durable Vocational Truck Gasoline Engine SAE Int. J. Engines 9 3 2016 10.4271/2016-01-0660
- Heiduk , T. , Kuhn , M. , Stichmeir , M.
- Insenstadt , A. German , J. , Dorobantu , M. , Boggs , D. , et al. theicct.org/.../Downsized-boosted-gasoline-engines_working-paper_ICCT_2710
- Anderson , J.E. , Kramer , U. , Mueller , S.A. , and Wallington , T.J. Octane Numbers of Ethanol and Methanol-Gasoline Blends Estimated from Molar Concentrations Energy & Fuels 24 6576 6585 2010 10.1021/ef101125c
- Bromberg , L. and Blumberg , P. http://library.psfc.mit.edu/catalog/reports/2000/09ja/09ja033/09ja033_abs.html
- Flugge , M. , Lewandrowski , J. , Rosenfeld , J. , Boland , C. et al. 2017
- Bromberg , L. and Cohn , D. 2016