This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Cooling Parasitic Considerations for Optimal Sizing and Power Split Strategy for Military Robot Powered by Hydrogen Fuel Cells
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Military vehicles are typically armored, hence the open surface area for heat rejection is limited. Hence, the cooling parasitic load for a given heat rejection can be considerably higher and important to consider upfront in the system design. Since PEMFCs operate at low temp, the required cooling flow is larger to account for the smaller delta temperature to the air. This research aims to address the combined problem of optimal sizing of the lithium ion battery and PEM Fuel Cell stack along with development of the scalable power split strategy for small a PackBot robot. We will apply scalable physics-based models of the fuel cell stack and balance of plant that includes a realistic and scalable parasitic load from cooling integrated with existing scalable models of the lithium ion battery. This model allows the combined optimization that captures the dominant trends relevant to component sizing and system performance. The baseline optimal performance is assessed using dynamic programming for a reduced order model, by assuming a static cooling load required to maintain the stack at the operating temperature with peak efficiency. Pseudo-spectral optimization methods, which enable fast computation even for larger number of states in the model is then used to consider the additional control of the cooling system. For scaling of the battery in the hybrid system we can use a modular approach, adding cells in parallel and series. If the fuel cell operates always with net power above the peak efficiency point, a simple rule based strategy can nearly recover the optimal fuel consumption achieved with dynamic programming. However, for stack operation at powers near and below the peak eff point the simple rule based strategy performs almost 20% worse than the optimal.
CitationSiegel, J., Stefanopoulou, A., Rizzo, D., and Prakash, N., "Cooling Parasitic Considerations for Optimal Sizing and Power Split Strategy for Military Robot Powered by Hydrogen Fuel Cells," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0798, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0798.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
- Nandjou, F., Poirot-Crouvezier, J.-P. et al., “Impact of Heat and Water Management on Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells Degradation in Automotive Application,” Journal of Power Sources 326, 2016.
- Siegel, J.B., Yesilyurt, S., and Stefanopoulou, A.G., “Modeling and Experiments of Voltage Transients of Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells with the Dead-Ended Anode,” Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology 9, 2012.
- J. B.Siegel, Y.Wang, A. G.Stefanopoulou and B. A.McCain, "Comparison of SOFC and PEM Fuel Cell Hybrid Power Management Strategies for Mobile Robots," Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), 2015 IEEE, Montreal, QC, 2015, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.1109/VPPC.2015.7352914.
- K.Boice, A.Leo, et al. “Baseline Field Testing of BB-2590 Lithium-Ion Batteries using an iRobot FasTac 510 Robot.” U.S. Army Tank Automotive Research, Development, and Engineering Center, Technical Report no 21320. Sept 2010.
- Mech, M.M., “Fuel Cell Engines,” (Wiley, 2008).
- YouZhiyu, Xu Tao, LiuZhixiang, PengYun, Cheng Weirong, “Study on Air-Cooled Self-Humidifying PEMFC Control Method Based on Segmented Predict Negative Feedback Control,” In Electrochimica Acta, Volume 132, 2014, Pages 389-396, ISSN 0013-4686, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2014.04.003.
- Bejan, A., “Convection Heat Transfer,” Fourth Edition (John Wiley & Sons, 2013).
- Zolot, M., Anthony J.Markel, and Ahmad A.Pesaran. “Analysis of Fuel Cell Hybridization and Implications for Energy Storage Devices.” National Renewable Energy Laborary, 2007. 4th Annual AABC June 2004.
- Sundstroem, O. and Stefanopoulou, A.G., “Optimum Battery Size for Fuel Cell Hybrid Electric Vehicle, Part I,” ASME Journal of Fuel Cell Science and Technology 4(2):167-175, December 2007.
- Bellman R.Dynamic Programming. Courier Corporation; 2013 Apr 9.
- Sundstrom, O.; Guzzella, L., "A Generic Dynamic Programming Matlab Function," Control Applications, (CCA) & Intelligent Control, (ISIC), 2009 IEEE, vol., no., pp.1625,1630, 8-10 July 2009
- Sundström, O., Ambühl, D., and Guzzella, L., “On Implementation of Dynamic Programming for Optimal Control Problems with Final State Constraints,” Oil & Gas Science and Technology-Revue de l’Institut Français du Pétrole 65(1):91-102, 2010.
- Patterson, Michael A., and Anil V.Rao. "Exploiting Sparsity in Direct Collocation Pseudospectral Methods for Solving Optimal Control Problems." Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets 49.2 (2012): 364-377.
- Patterson, M.A. and Rao, A.V., “GPOPS-II: A MATLAB Software for Solving Multiple-Phase Optimal Control Problems Using Hp-Adaptive Gaussian Quadrature Collocation Methods and Sparse Nonlinear Programming,” ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) 41(1):1, 2014.
- W.Zhou, C.Zhang, J.Li and H. K.Fathy, "A Pseudospectral Strategy for Optimal Power Management in Series Hybrid Electric Powertrains," in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 4813-4825, June 2016.doi: 10.1109/TVT.2015.2466671.