This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Control Optimization of a Charge Sustaining Hybrid Powertrain for Motorsports
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
The automotive industry is aggressively pursuing fuel efficiency improvements through hybridization of production vehicles, and there are an increasing number of racing series adopting similar architectures to maintain relevance with current passenger car trends. Hybrid powertrains offer both performance and fuel economy benefits in a motorsport setting, but they greatly increase control complexity and add additional degrees of freedom to the design optimization process. The increased complexity creates opportunity for performance gains, but simulation based tools are necessary since hybrid powertrain design and control strategies are closely coupled and their optimal interactions are not straightforward to predict. One optimization-related advantage that motorsports applications have over production vehicles is that the power demand of circuit racing has strong repeatability due to the nature of the track and the professional skill-level of the driver. The repeatable behavior from lap to lap allows for the efficient utilization of dynamic programming (DP) techniques to optimize vehicle speed and power management for a given race track, which is the focus of this research. The DP strategy is derived and described in detail using a hybrid rallycross vehicle as an example. The DP strategy minimizes lap time while sustaining battery charge at the end of each lap. Constraints on engine torque, electric motor power, battery capacity and tire friction are incorporated into the proposed strategy. The DP also generates an execution map that can be used for real-time on-vehicle implementation. This map includes optimal vehicle speed and power management strategies for all possible situations that the vehicle can experience during the real racing event.
CitationZhu, Q., Song, S., Tan, X., Song, C. et al., "Control Optimization of a Charge Sustaining Hybrid Powertrain for Motorsports," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0416, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0416.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
- J.R.Anderson and B.Ayalew, “Global Optimization of Local Weights in Mixed-Cost MPC for Minimum Time Vehicle Maneuvering”, in Proc. of 2017 IEEE CCTA, Aug 27-30, 2017, Kohala Coast, Hawai’i, USA.
- D.Casanova, “On Minimum Time Vehicle Maneuvering the Theoretical Optimal Lap”, Ph.D. dissertation, Cranfield University, Nov 2000.
- Kelly, D. and Sharp, R., “Time-Optimal Control of the Race Car: A Numerical Method to Emulate the Ideal Driver,” Vehicle System Dynamics 48(12):1461-1474, 2010.
- Ungoren, A.Y. and Peng, H., “An Adaptive Lateral Prevew Driver Model,” Vehicle System Dynamics 43(4):245-259, 2005.
- Brayshaw, D. and Harrison, M., “A Quasi Steady State Approach to Race Car Lap Simulation in Order to Understand the Effects of Racing Line and centre of Gravity Location,” Proc. of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering 219(6):725-739, 2005.
- Lipp, T. and Boyd, S., “Minimum-Time Speed Optimization Over a Fixed Path,” International Journal of Control 1(1):1-15, 2014.
- Kapania, N.R., Subosits, J., and Gerdes, J.C., “A Sequential Two-Step Algorithm for Fast Generation of Vehicle Racing Trajectories,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Trans. of the ASME 138(9), Sep., 2016.
- Timings, J.P. and Cole, D.J., “Minimum Maneuver Time Calculation Using Convex Optimization,” ASME J. Dyn. Syst. Meas. Control 135(3):031015, 2013.
- Gerdts, M., Karrenberg, S., Müller-Beßler, B., and Stock, G., “Generating Locally Optimal Trajectories for an Automatically Driven Car,” Optimization and Engineering 10(4):439-463, 2009.
- Hendrikx, J., Meijlink, J., and Kriens, R., “Application of Optimal Control Theory to Inverse Simulation of Car Handling,” Vehicle System Dynamics 26:449-461, 1996.
- Bertolazzi, E., Biral, F., and Da Lio, M., “Symbolic-Numeric Indirect Method for Solving Optimal Control Problems for Large Multibody Systems,” Multibody System Dynamics 13(2):233-252, 2005.
- Garg, D., Patterson, M., Hager, W.W., Rao, A.V. et al., “A Unified Framework for the Numerical Solution of Optimal Control Problems Using Pseudospectral Methods,” Automatica 46(11):1843-1851, 2010.
- Betts, J.T., “Survey of Numerical Methods for Trajectory Optimization,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 21(2):193-207, 1998.
- D. P.Bertsekas, Dynamic Programming and Optimal Control, 4th edition, Athena Scientific, Jun., 2012.
- H.A.Borhan, A.Vahidi, A.M.Phillips et al., “Predictive Energy Management of a Power-Split Hybrid Electric Vehicle”, in Proc. of 2009 ACC, St. Louis, MO, USA, Jun, 2009.
- C.Weng, X.Zhang and J.Sun, “Adaptive Model Predictive Control for Hybrid Electric Vehicles Power Management”, in Proc. of the 32nd Chinese Control Conference, Xi’an, China, Jul, 2013.
- L.V.Perez, G.R.Bossio, D.Moitre and G.O.Garcia, “Optimization of power management in a hybrid electric vehicle using dynamic programming”, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, vol., 73, no. 1-4, pp. 244-254, Nov, 2006.
- Y.Zou, T.Liu, F.Sun and H.Peng, “Comparative Study of Dynamic Programming and Pontryagin’s Minimum Principle on Energy Management for a Parallel Hybrid Electric Vehicle”, Energies, vol., 6, no., 4, pp. 2305-2318, Apr 2013.
- T.D.Gillespie, Fundamentals of Vehicle Dynamics, Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., Feb, 1992.
- W.F.Milliken and D.L.Milliken, Race Car Vehicle Dynamics, SAE International, Dec, 1994.