This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Towards Ultra-Low NOx Emissions within GHG Phase 2 Constraints: Main Challenges and Technology Directions
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 3, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Increasing efforts to minimize global warming has led to regulation of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of automotive applications. The US is frontrunner regarding implementation of GHG related legislation with the introduction of GHG phase 1 and phase 2, ultimately targeting a 40% fuel consumption reduction in 2027 compared to 2010 on vehicle level. More specific, engines are required to reduce CO2 emissions by 6% compared to GHG phase 1 levels. Next to the GHG emission legislation, more stringent legislation is anticipated in the US to further reduce NOx emissions: a further 90% reduction is targeted as soon as 2024 compared to 2010 standard. Meeting these anticipated ultra-low NOx standards within the GHG phase 2 constraints on CO2 poses a great challenge. This paper presents an overview of the main challenges and key aspects regarding meeting ultra-low NOx requirements within the constraints on CO2 and N2O set by GHG phase 2 regulations. The study is based on simulation results from validated control-oriented models of current and future engine and aftertreatment technologies. As reference a Heavy-Duty EURO VI compliant engine and aftertreatment system is used, applying a conventional diesel combustion process. On engine level, application of Waste Heat Recovery (WHR) and Variable Valve Actuation (VVA) - in form of an Electromagnetic Operated Control Valves EOCV - are evaluated to reduce the impact of ultra-low NOx requirements on fuel consumption. Considered aftertreatment technologies contain SCR on Filter and Passive NOx adsorber in combination with (multi-point) model-based dosing control logic. Tailpipe NOx and engine-out CO2 levels are evaluated on the US composite FTP type-approval cycle. Based on the results a view on future Heavy Duty engines compliant to next generation legislation will be presented.
CitationSeykens, X., Kupper, F., Mentink, P., and Ramesh, S., "Towards Ultra-Low NOx Emissions within GHG Phase 2 Constraints: Main Challenges and Technology Directions," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0331, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0331.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 7]|
- Maus, W., Jacob, E., Synthetic Fuels - OME1: A potentially Sustainable Diesel Fuel, http://www.emitec.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Bibliothek/Vortraege/140217_Maus_Jacob_LVK_Wien_deutsch.pdf
- Vermeulen R, Vonk W, van Gijlswijk R, Buskemolen E. The Netherlands In-Service emissions testing programme for heavy-duty vehicles 2015-2016 - annual report. Technical report, TNO 2016 R11270, TNO, 2016
- US Environmental Protection Agency, Memorandum in Response to Petition for Rulemaking to Adapt Ultra-Low NOx standards for On-Highway Heavy-Duty Trucks and Engines, 2016 https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-12/documents/nox-memorandum-nox-petition-response-2016-12-20.pdf
- Sharp, C., Webb, C., Neely, G., Sarlashkar, J. et al., “Achieving Ultra Low NOXEmissions Levels with a 2017 Heavy-Duty On-Highway TC Diesel Engine and an Advanced Technology Emissions System - NOXManagement Strategies,” SAE Int. J. Engines 10(4):1736-1748, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0958.
- Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2, Final Rules, [EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827; NHTSA-2014-0132; FRL-9950-25-OAR] RIN 2060-AS16; RIN 2127-AL52, signed on October 25, 2016
- CARB Phase 2 Comment: www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onroad/caphase2ghg/carb_phase_2_comments.pdf
- Venne, J. van de, Hendriksen, P, Smokers, R., et al., “TNO_ADVANCE: A Modular Powertrain Simulation and Design Tool,” IMechE Conference on Combustion Engines and Hybrid Vehicles, 28-29 Apr, 1998, London, UK
- Cloudt R, Saenen J, van den Eijnden E, et al. “Virtual Exhaust Line for Model-based Diesel Aftertreatment Development”, SAE Technical Paper, 2010-01-0888, 201010.4271/2010-01-0888.
- Eijnden, E.van den, Cloudt, R., Willems, F., Heijden, P. van den, “Automated Model Fit Tool for SCR control and OBD development,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1285, 2009doi:10.4271/2009-01-1285
- Hommen, G., Kupper, F., and Seykens, X., “Robust, Model-Based Urea Dosing Control for SCR Aftertreatment,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0938, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0938.
- Hommen, G., Ramesh, S., Seykens, X., Willems, F., et al. “Model-Based Control Development for Future Diesel Engines,”, Automobile Technology, 2017, In Press.
- Mentink, P., Ramesh, S., Seykens X., “Low load BSFC improvement by use of EOCV,” TNO Internal Report 2017.
- Feru, E., Kupper, F., Rojer, C., and Seykens, X., “Experimental Validation of a Dynamic Waste Heat Recovery System Model for Control Purposes,” SAE technical Paper 2013-01-1647, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1647.
- Nova, I., Tronconi, E. (Eds.), “Urea-SCR Technology for deNOx After Treatment of Diesel Exhausts, Springer Science+Business Media, New York, USA, 2014, ISBN: 978-1-4899-8071-7
- Glensvig, M., Schreier, H., Tizianel, M., Theissl, H. et al., “Testing of a Long Haul Demonstrator Vehicle with a Waste Heat Recovery System on Public Road,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-8057, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-8057.
- Karvountzis-Kontakiotis, A., Pesiridis, A., Zhao, H., Alshammari, F. et al., “Effect of an ORC Waste Heat Recovery System on Diesel Engine Fuel Economy for Off-Highway Vehicles,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0136, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0136.
- Daccord, R., “A piston expander for exhaust heat recovery on a demonstration truck,” 3rd Engine ORC Consortium Workshop Sep 14-16, Belfast, Northern Ireland
- Jeihouni, Y., Eichler, K., and Franke, M., “Lower Emissions in Commercial Diesel Engines through Waste Heat Recovery,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-8084, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-8084.
- Cloudt, R. and Willems, F., “Integrated Emission Management Strategy for cost-optimal engine-aftertreatment operation,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-01-1310, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-01-1310.
- Mentink, P., van den Nieuwenhof, R., Kupper, F., Willems, F., Kooijman D., “Robust Emission Management Strategy to Meet Real-World Emission Requirements for HD Diesel Engines,” SAE Int. J. Engines 8(3): 1168-1180, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0998.
- Ramachandran, S., Hommen, G., Mentink, P., Seykens, X. et al., “Robust, Cost-Optimal and Compliant Engine and Aftertreatment Operation Using Air-Path Control and Tailpipe Emission Feedback,” SAE Int. J. Engines 9(3):1662-1673, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0961.