This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
The Impact of Operating Conditions on Post-Injection Efficacy; a Study Using Design-of-Experiments
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Post-injection strategies prove to be a valuable option for reducing soot emission, but experimental results often differ from publication to publication. These discrepancies are likely caused by the selected operating conditions and engine hardware in separate studies. Efforts to optimize not only engine-out soot, but simultaneously fuel economy and emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) complicate the understanding of post-injection effects even more. Still, the large amount of published work on the topic is gradually forming a consensus. In the current work, a Design-of-Experiments (DoE) procedure and regression analysis are used to investigate the influence of various operating conditions on post-injection scheduling and efficacy. The study targets emission reductions of soot and NOx, as well as fuel economy improvements. Experiments are conducted on a heavy-duty compression ignition engine at three load-speed combinations. Regression analysis shows that the eventual decrease in engine-out soot heavily depends on the air-excess ratio. This observation supports the suggestion that enhanced late-cycle mixing of fuel and oxidizer is an important contributor to observed soot reductions. Furthermore, simultaneous reductions in emissions of NOx and fuel consumption with little or no impact on soot are obtained for particular injection scheduling at low load. At higher engine speed and load, soot reductions are preserved, although shifting the NOx-soot trade-off is more difficult to establish. It was found that rate of exhaust gas recirculation (EGR), timing of the main injection event and fuel pressure generally need careful adjustment to make optimal use of a post-injection scheme. Finally, several points of attention for post-injection scheduling and selecting appropriate operating parameter settings are listed.
CitationWillems, R., Bakker, P., Dreezen, R., and Somers, B., "The Impact of Operating Conditions on Post-Injection Efficacy; a Study Using Design-of-Experiments," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0229, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0229.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
- Chen, S.K., “Simultaneous Reduction of NOx and Particulate Emissions by Using Multiple Injections in a Small Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-3084, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-3084.
- Badami, M., Mallamo, F., Millo, F., and Rossi, E.E., “Influence of Multiple Injection Strategies on Emissions, Combustion Noise and BSFC of a DI Common Rail Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0503, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-0503.
- Desantes, J.M., Arrègle, J., Javier López, J., and García, A., “A Comprehensive Study of Diesel Combustion and Emissions with Post-injection,” SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0915, 2007, doi:10.4271/2007-01-0915.
- Vanegas, A., Won, C., Felsch, M., Gauding, M. et al., “Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Multiple Injections on Pollutant Formation in a Common-Rail DI Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-1191, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-1191.
- Benajes, J., Molina, S., and García, J.M., “Influence of Pre- and Post-Injection on the Performance and Pollutant Emissions in a HD Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0526, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-0526.
- Payri, F., Benajes, J., Pastor, J.V., and Molina, S., “Influence of the Post-Injection Pattern on Performance, Soot and NOx Emissions in a HD Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0502, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-0502.
- Sperl, A., “The Influence of Post-Injection Strategies on the Emissions of Soot and Particulate Matter in Heavy Duty Euro V Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2011-36-0350, 2011, doi:10.4271/2011-36-0350.
- O’Connor, J. and Musculus, M., “Post Injections for Soot Reduction in Diesel Engines: A Review of Current Understanding,” SAE Int. J. Engines 6(1):400-421, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0917.
- Hotta, A., Inayoshi, M., and Nakakita, K., “Achieving Lower Exhaust Emissions and Better Performance in an HDSI Diesel Engine with Multiple Injection,” SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-0928, 2005, doi:10.4271/2005-01-0928.
- Mingfa, Y., Hu, W., Zunqing, Z., and Yan, Y., “Experimental Study of Multiple Injections and Coupling Effects of Multi-Injection and EGR in a HD Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-2807, 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2807.
- Rakesh, B., Bakara, A.S., and Sarware, A., “Effect of Fuel Injection Parameters and EGR on Exhaust Emission of a 3 L Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-2814, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-2814.
- Horibe, N., Komizo, T., Sumimoto, T., Wang, H. et al., “Smoke Reduction Effects by Post Injection for Various Injection Parameters and Combustion Chamber Shapes in a Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-2634, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2634.
- Horibe, N., Komizo, T., Mamizuka, Y., Sumimoto, T. et al., “Analysis of Mixture Formation Process in a Diesel Engine with Post Injection,” SAE Technical Paper 2015-01-1836, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-1836.
- Montgomery, D.T. and Reitz, R.D., “Optimization of Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Operating Parameters Using a Response Surface Method,” SAE Technical Paper 2000-01-1962, 2000, doi:10.4271/2000-01-1962.
- Montgomery, D.T. and Reitz, R.D., “Effects of Multiple Injections and Flexible Control of Boost and EGR on Emissions and Fuel Consumption of a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-0195, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-0195.
- d’Ambrosio, S. and Ferrari, A., “Potential of Multiple Injection Strategies Implementing the after Shot and Optimized with the Design of Experiments Procedure to Improve Diesel Engine Emissions and Performance,” Applied Energy 155:933-946, 2015, doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.05.124.
- Martin, J., Sun, C., Boehman, A., and O’Connor, J., “Experimental Study of Post Injection Scheduling for Soot Reduction in a Light-Duty Turbodiesel Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2016-01-0726, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0726.
- Christian, R., Knopf, F., Jaschek, A., and Schindler, W., “Eine Neue Messmethodik der Bosch-zahl mit Erhörter Empfindlichkeit,” MTZ 54:16-22, 1993.
- Northrop, W.F., Bohac, S.V., Chin, J., and Assanis, D.N., “Comparison of Filter Smoke Number and Elemental Carbon Mass from Partially Premixed Low Temperature Combustion in a Direct-Injection Diesel Engine,” J. Eng. Gas Turbine Power 133(10), 2011, doi:10.1115/1.4002918.
- Pandurangi, S., Frapolli, N., Bolla, M., Boulouchos, K. et al., “Influence of EGR on Post-Injection Effectiveness in a Heavy-Duty Diesel Engine Fuelled with n-Heptane,” SAE Int. J. Engines 7(4):1851-1862, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-2633.