This content is not included in your SAE MOBILUS subscription, or you are not logged in.
Effects of Heat of Vaporization and Octane Sensitivity on Knock-Limited Spark Ignition Engine Performance
ISSN: 0148-7191, e-ISSN: 2688-3627
Published April 03, 2018 by SAE International in United States
This content contains downloadable datasetsAnnotation ability available
Knock-limited loads for a set of surrogate gasolines all having nominal 100 research octane number (RON), approximately 11 octane sensitivity (S), and a heat of vaporization (HOV) range of 390 to 595 kJ/kg at 25°C were investigated. A single-cylinder spark-ignition engine derived from a General Motors Ecotec direct injection (DI) engine was used to perform load sweeps at a fixed intake air temperature (IAT) of 50 °C, as well as knock-limited load measurements across a range of IATs up to 90 °C. Both DI and pre-vaporized fuel (supplied by a fuel injector mounted far upstream of the intake valves and heated intake runner walls) experiments were performed to separate the chemical and thermal effects of the fuels’ knock resistance. The DI load sweeps at 50°C intake air temperature showed no effect of HOV on the knock-limited performance. The data suggest that HOV acts as a thermal contributor to S under the conditions studied. Measurement of knock-limited loads from the IAT sweeps for DI at late combustion phasing showed that a 40 vol% ethanol (E40) blend provided additional knock resistance at the highest temperatures, compared to a 20 vol% ethanol blend and hydrocarbon fuel with similar RON and S. Using the pre-vaporized fuel system, all the high S fuels produced nearly identical knock-limited loads at each temperature across the range of IATs studied. For these fuels RON ranged from 99.2 to 101.1 and S ranged from 9.4 to 12.2, with E40 having the lowest RON and highest S. The higher knock-limited loads for E40 at the highest IATs examined were consistent with the slightly higher S for this fuel, and the lower engine operating condition K values arising from use of this fuel. The study highlights how fuel HOV can affect the temperature at intake valve closing, and consequently the pressure-temperature history of the end gas leading to more negative values of K, thereby enhancing the effect of S on knock resistance.
- Matthew A. Ratcliff - National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Jonathan Burton - National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Petr Sindler - National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Earl Christensen - National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Lisa Fouts - National Renewable Energy Laboratory
- Robert L. McCormick - National Renewable Energy Laboratory
CitationRatcliff, M., Burton, J., Sindler, P., Christensen, E. et al., "Effects of Heat of Vaporization and Octane Sensitivity on Knock-Limited Spark Ignition Engine Performance," SAE Technical Paper 2018-01-0218, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4271/2018-01-0218.
Data Sets - Support Documents
|[Unnamed Dataset 1]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 2]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 3]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 4]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 5]|
|[Unnamed Dataset 6]|
- Leone, T.G., Anderson, J.E., Davis, R.S., Iqbal, A., et al., “The Effect of Compression Ratio, Fuel Octane Rating, and Ethanol Content on Spark-Ignition Engine Efficiency,” Environmental Science and Technology 49:10778-10789, 2015.
- United States Energy Information Administration, https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=32&t=6, accessed Oct. 11, 2017.
- United States Energy Information Administration, https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=19211, accessed Oct. 11, 2017.
- Elgowainy, A., Han, J., Cai, H., Wang, M. et al., “Energy Efficiency and Greenhouse Gas Emission Intensity of Petroleum Products at U.S. Refineries,” Environmental Science & Technology 48(13):7612-7624, 2014.
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Department of Transportation, “2017 and Later Model Year Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards; Final Rule.” Federal Register 77(199): 62623-63200, 2012.
- The International Council on Clean Transportation, Global Passenger Vehicle Standards. http://www.theicct.org/info-tools/global-passenger-vehicle-standards.
- Caton, J.A., “A Comparison of Lean Operation and Exhaust Gas Recirculation: Thermodynamic Reasons for the Increases of Efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0266, 2013; doi:10.4271/2013-01-0266,
- Alger, T., Mangold, B., Roberts, C., and Gingrich, J., “The Interaction of Fuel Anti-Knock Index and Cooled EGR on Engine Performance and Efficiency” SAE Int. J. Engines 5(3):2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1149.
- Heywood, J.B., “Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals,” (New York, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1988).
- Yi, J., Wooldridge, S., Coulson, G., Hilditch, J., et al., “Development and Optimization of the Ford 3.5L V6 EcoBoost Combustion System,” SAE Int. J. Eng., 2(1):20, 2009.
- Leone, T. G., and Pozar, M., “Fuel Economy Benefit of Cylinder Deactivation - Sensitivity to Vehicle Application and Operating Constraints,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-3591, 2001, Doi:10.4271/2001-01-3591.
- Ayala, F.A., Gerty, M. D., and Heywood, J. B., “Effects of Combustion Phasing, Relative Air-fuel Ratio, Compression Ratio, and Load on SI Engine Efficiency,” SAE Technical Paper 2006-01-0229, 2006; doi: 10.4271/2006-01-0229.
- Leone, T., Olin, E., Anderson, J., Jung, H., et al., “Effects of Fuel Octane Rating and Ethanol Content on Knock, Fuel Economy, and CO2 for a Turbocharged DI Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 7(1):2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1228.
- Chow, E., Heywood, J., and Speth, R., “Benefits of a Higher Octane Standard Gasoline for the U.S. Light-Duty Vehicle Fleet,” SAE Technical Paper 2014-01-1961, 2014, doi:10.4271/2014-01-1961.
- Kalghatgi G.T., “Fuel Anti-Knock Quality - Part II. Vehicle Studies - How Relevant is Motor Octane Number in Modern Engines?” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-3585, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-3585.
- Mittal V., and Heywood J., “The Shift in Relevance of Fuel RON and MON to Knock Onset in Modern SI Engines Over the Last 70 Years,” SAE Int. J. Engines., 2(2), 2009, doi:10.4271/2009-01-2622.
- Kalghatgi, G.T., “Fuel Engine Interactions,” (Warren, PA, SAE International, 2013).
- Mittal, V., and Heywood, J., “The Relevance of Fuel RON and MON to Knock Onset in Modern SI Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-2414, 2008, doi:10.4271/2008-01-2414.
- Wyszynski, L.P., Stone, C.R., and Kalghatgi, G.T., “The Volumetric Efficiency of Direct and Port Injection Gasoline Engines with Different Fuels,” SAE Technical Paper 2002-01-0839, 2002, doi:10.4271/2002-01-0839.
- Okamoto, K., Ichikawa, T., Saitoh, K., Oyama, K., et al., Study of Antiknock Performance Under Various Octane Numbers and Compression Ratios in a DISI Engine,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-1804, 2003; DOI 10.4271/2003-01-1804.
- Anderson, J.E., DiCicco, D.M., Ginder, J.M., Kramer, U. et al., “High Octane Number Ethanol-Gasoline Blends: Quantifying the Potential Benefits in the United States,” Fuel 97:585-594, 2012.
- Kasseris, E., and Heywood, J., “Charge Cooling Effects on Knock Limits in SI DI Engines Using Gasoline/Ethanol Blends: Part 1 - Quantifying Charge Cooling,” SAE Technical Paper No. 2012-01-1275, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1275.
- Kasseris, E., and Heywood, J., “Charge Cooling Effects on Knock Limits in SI DI Engines Using Gasoline/Ethanol Blends: Part 2 - Effective Octane Numbers,” SAE Technical Paper 2012-01-1284, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1284.
- Chupka, G.M., Christensen, E., Fouts, L., Alleman, T.L. et al., “Heat of Vaporization Measurements for Ethanol Blends up to 50 Volume Percent in Several Hydrocarbon Blendstocks and Implications for Knock in SI Engines,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 8(2):251-263, 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0763.
- Sluder, C.S., Szybist, J.P., Ratcliff, M.A., McCormick, R.L. et al., “Exploring the Relationship between Octane Sensitivity and Heat-of-Vaporization,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubri. 9(1):80-90, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0836.
- Stein, R.A., Polovina, D., Roth, K., Foster, M. et al., “Effect of Heat of Vaporization, Chemical Octane, and Sensitivity on Knock Limit for Ethanol - Gasoline Blends,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(2):823−843, 2012.
- Wang, C., Janssen, A., Prakash, A., Cracknell, R. et al., “Splash Blended Ethanol in a Spark Ignition Engine - Effect of RON, Octane Sensitivity, and Charge Cooling,” Fuel 196:21-31, 2017.
- Foong, T.,Morganti, K., Brear, M.,da Silva, G., et al., “The Effect of Charge Cooling on the RON of Ethanol/Gasoline Blends,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr.2013; 6(1), doi:10.4271/2013-01-0886, 34, 43.
- Thewes, M., Küpper, C., Rezaei, R., Pischinger, S., et al., “Future Fuels for Modern DISI Engines.” In 19th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology, 539- 570, 2010.
- Vuilleumier, D. and Sjöberg, M., “Significance of RON, MON, and LTHR for Knock Limits of Compositionally Dissimilar Gasoline Fuels in a DISI Engine,” SAE Int. J. Eng. 10(3), 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0662.
- Jung, H., Shelby, M., Newman, C., and Stein, R., “Effect of Ethanol on Part Load Thermal Efficiency and CO2 Emissions of SI Engines,” SAE Int. J. Eng. 6(1):456-469, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-1634.
- Foong, T.M.,Morganti, K.J., Brear, M.J., daSilva, G., et al., “The Octane Numbers of Ethanol Blended with Gasoline and its Surrogates.” Fuel,115:727-739, 2014.
- Morgan, N., Smallbone, A., Bhave, A., Kraft, M. et al., “Mapping Surrogate Gasoline Compositions into RON/MON Space,” Combustion and Flame 157:1122-1131, 2010.
- Ratcliff, M.A., Burton, J., Sindler, P., Christensen, E. et al., “Knock Resistance and Fine Particle Emissions for Several Biomass-Derived Oxygenates in a Direct-Injection Spark-Ignition Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 9(1):59-70, 2016, doi:10.4271/2016-01-0705.
- McCormick, R.L., Ratcliff, M.A., Christensen, E., Fouts, L. et al., “Properties of Oxygenates Found in Upgraded Biomass Pyrolysis Oil as Components of Spark and Compression Ignition Engine Fuels,” Energy and Fuels 29(4):2453-2461, 2015.
- Cannella, W., Foster, M., Gunter, G., and Leppard, W., “FACE Gasolines and Blends with Ethanol: Detailed Characterization of Physical and Chemical Properties,” CRC Report No. AVFL-24, July 2014.
- He, X., Ratcliff, M.A., and Zigler, B.T., “Effects of Gasoline Direct Injection Engine Operating Parameters on Particle Number Emissions,” Energy & Fuels 26:2014-2027, 2012.
- National Instruments, “Combustion Analysis System Software for LabVIEW User Manual,” 162. http://digital.ni.com/manuals.nsf/websearch/C2B04021AA306BBB86257BCD007365C6.
- Gatowski, J. A., Balles, E. N., Chun, K. M., Nelson, F. E., et al., “Heat Release Analysis of Engine Pressure Data,” SAE Technical Paper 841359, 1984, doi.org/10.4271/841359.
- Cheung, H. M., and Heywood, J. B., “Evaluation of a One-Zone Burn-Rate Analysis Procedure Using Production SI Engine Pressure Data,” SAE Technical Paper 932749, 1993, doi.org/10.4271/932749.
- Szybist, J.P. and Splitter, D.A., “Pressure and Temperature Effects on Fuels with Varying Octane Sensitivity at High Load in SI Engines,” Combustion and Flame 177:49-66, 2017.
- Kalghatgi, G., “Fuel Anti-Knock Quality - Part I. Engine Studies,” SAE Technical Paper 2001-01-3584, 2001, doi:10.4271/2001-01-3584.
- Zhou, Z., Yi, Y., Brear, M., Lacey, J. et al., “A Comparison of four Methods for Determining the Octane Index and K on a Modern Engine with Upstream, Port or Direct Injection,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-0666, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-0666.
- Risberg, P., Kalghatgi, G.T., and Ångstrom, H.-E., “Auto-ignition Quality of Gasoline-Like Fuels in HCCI Engines,” SAE Technical Paper 2003-01-3215, 2003, 10.4271/2003-01-3215.
- Amer, A., Babiker, H., Chang, J., Kalghatgi, G. et al., “Fuel Effects on Knock in a Highly Boosted Direct Injection Spark Ignition Engine,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 5(3):1048-1065, 2012, doi:10.4271/2012-01-1634.
- Tian, M., Haaren, R.V., Reijnders, J., and Boot, M., “Lignin Derivatives as Potential Octane Boosters,” SAE Int. J. Fuels Lubr. 8(2), 2015, doi:10.4271/2015-01-0963.
- Boot, M.D., Tian, M., Hensen, E.J.M., and Sarathy, S.M., “Impact of Fuel Molecular Structure on Auto-Ignition Behavior - Design Rules for Future High Performance Gasolines,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 60:1-25, 2017.
- Kolodziej, C.P. and Wallner, T., “Combustion Characteristics of Various Fuels during Research Octane Number Testing on an Instrumented CFR F1/F2 Engine,” Combustion Engines 171(4):164-169, 2017.